Article published in:
Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic Units
Edited by Tsuyoshi Ono, Ritva Laury and Ryoko Suzuki
[Studies in Language 43:2] 2019
► pp. 402443
References

References

Auer, Peter
1996On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting (eds.), Prosody in Conversation, 57–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25(1). 7–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2003Referential density in discourse and syntactic typology. Language 79(4). 708–736. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E.
2012Turn-constructional units and the transition relevance place. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of Conversation Analysis, 150–166. Malden MA: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 440 ]
Čmejrková, Světla & Carlo L. Prevignano
2003On conversation analysis: An interview with Emanuel A. Schegloff. In Carlo L. Prevignano & Paul J. Thibault (eds.), Discussing conversation analysis: The work of Emanuel A. Schegloff, 11–55. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter, Gabriella Hermon & Yassir Tjung
2006Is There Pasif Semu in Jakarta Indonesian? Oceanic Linguistics 45(1). 64–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1989Language universals and linguistic typology, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Tsuyoshi Ono
2007‘Incrementing’ in conversation: A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics 17(4). 513–552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, Susanna
1991Functional change: The case of Malay constituent order. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Heer, Gerrit Koenraad
1975Indonesian syntax. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf & Susanne Günthner
(eds.) 2015Temporality in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Djenar, Dwi Noverini
2014 Nih and tuh as spatial deixis in imagined interaction. In Anthony Jukes (ed.), Deixis and spatial expressions in languages of Indonesia. NUSA 56. 27–46.Google Scholar
2015Pronouns and sociospatial ordering in conversation and fiction. In Laure Gardelle & Sandrine Sorlin (eds.), The pragmatics of personal pronouns, 195–213. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Djenar, Dwi Noverini, Michael C. Ewing & Howard Manns
2018Style and intersubjectivity in youth interaction. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
1987The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63(4). 805–855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 359–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W. & Elise Kärkkäinen
2012Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text and Talk 32(4). 433–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Stephen Schuetze-Coburn, Danae Paolino & Susanna Cumming
1993Outline of discourse transcription. In Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research, 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick
2011Sources of asymmetry in human interaction: Enchrony, status, knowledge and agency. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jacob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 285–312. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
2003Searching for structure: The problem of complementation in colloquial Indonesian conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Grammatical resources for social purposes: Some aspects of stancetaking in colloquial Indonesian conversation. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 69–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 441 ]
2008From subordinate clause to noun-phrase: Yang constructions in colloquial Indonesian. In Ritva Laury (ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions, 1–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, Michael C.
2005aColloquial Indonesian. In Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 227–258. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005bGrammar and inference in conversation: Identifying clause structure in spoken Javanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015aLocalising person reference among Indonesian youth. In Zane Goebel, Deborah Cole & Howard Manns (eds.), Margins, hubs, and peripheries in a decentralizing Indonesia. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies Special Issue 162: 26–41.Google Scholar
2015bThe kalau framing construction in Indonesian comics. In Dwi Noverini Djenar (ed.), Youth language in Indonesia and Malaysia. NUSA 58. 51–72Google Scholar
In press. Features of Indonesian in Bandung. NUSA.
Ewing, Michael C. & Susanna Cumming
1998Relative clauses in Indonesian discourse: Face to face and cyberspace interaction. In Shobhana L. Chelliah & Willem J. de Reuse (eds.), Papers from the fifth annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 79–96. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University Program for Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, & Sandra A. Thompson
2002Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence, 14–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A.
1982The focus systems in Old Javanese, Tagalog and Proto-Malayo-Polynesian. [Unpublished ms.].Google Scholar
Gärtner, Hans-Martin, Paul Law & Joachim Sabel
2006Clause structure and adjuncts in Austronesian languages: A critical introductory survey. In Hans-Martin Gärtner, Paul Law & Joachim Sabel (eds.), Clause Structure and Adjuncts in Austronesian Languages, 1–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2001Syntax: An introduction, Volume II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1995Sentence construction within interaction. In Uta M. Quasthoff (ed.), Aspects of oral communication, 198–219. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2001Emerging syntax for interaction: Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interaction. In Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics, 25–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2005The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: typological perspectives. In Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 110–181. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1984Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In V. D’Urso & P. Leonardi (eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric, 11–38. Padua: Cleup Editore.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene H.
1991On the syntax of sentences in progress. Language in Society 20(3). 441–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 442 ]
Macdonald, R. Ross & Soenjono Darjowidjojo
1967A student’s reference grammar of modern formal Indonesian. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Matić, Dejan
2015Information Structure in Linguistics. In James D. Wright (ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral Sciences, Volume 12, 2nd edn., 95–99. Elsevier: Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson
1994Unattached NPs in English conversation. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 20. 402–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson
1974A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50(4). 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1921Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1996Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret
2015Sentences and clauses – from the perspective of Interactional Linguistics. In Christa Dürscheid & Jan Georg Schneider (eds.), Handbuch Satz, Äußerung, Schema, 180–204. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sneddon, James N.
2006Colloquial Jakartan Indonesian. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sneddon, James N., Alexander Adelaar, Dwi N. Djenar & Michael C. Ewing
2010Indonesian: A comprehensive grammar, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon
1997Intransitive Predication. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin
1996Units in Mandarin conversation: Prosody, discourse, and grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2005The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies 7(4–5). 481–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2015Grammar in everyday talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, John U.
1986Formal Indonesian, 2nd edn. Ithaca: Cornell University Southeast Asia Program.Google Scholar
Wouk, Fay
1984Scalar transitivity and trigger choice in Toba Batak. In Paul Schachter (ed.), Studies in the structure of Toba Batak, 195–219. Los Angeles: UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
1999Dialect contact and koineization in Jakarta, Indonesia. Language Sciences 21(1). 61–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Mushin, Ilana & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2021. Linguistic structures in social interaction. Interactional Linguistics Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.