Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 18:1 (1994) ► pp.241252
References
Chomsky, N.
1982Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding, [L.I. Monograph 61]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1986Barriers. [L.I. Monograph 131]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Contreras, H.
1984 “A note on parasitic gapsLinguistic Inquiry 151: 698–701.Google Scholar
Drijkoningen, F.
1992Movement theory and the DP hypothesis. Unpubl. paper. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Frampton, J.
1990 “Parasitic gaps and the theory of Wh-chainsLinguistic Inquiry 211: 49–77.Google Scholar
Godard, D.
1988La syntaxe des relatives en français. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
1992 “Extraction out of NP in FrenchNatural language and linguistic theory 101: 233–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, J.
1990Argument structure. [L.I. Monograph 181]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guéron, J.
1992 “La possession inaliénable et l’aspect locatif” In: Tasmowski and Zribi-Hertz (eds).Google Scholar
Haegeman, L.
1992Generative syntax: Theory and description. A case study from West Flemish. Cambridge UK.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hulk, A. C. J.
1984 “La syntaxe du pronom ‘en’ dans la construction quantitativeRevue Québécoise de Linguistique 131: 167–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, C.
(ed) 1982La syntaxe comparée du français standard et populaire. Approche formelle et fonctionnelle. [Langues et Sociétés.] Gouvernement du Québec. Office de la langue française.Google Scholar
Pollock, J. -Y.
1992 “Opérateurs nuls, dont, questions indirectes et théorie de la quantification” In: Tasmowski and Zribi-Hertz (eds).Google Scholar
Rizzi, L.
1990Relativized minimality. [L.I. Monograph 161]. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, S.
1983The syntactic forms of predication. Unpubl. PhD. diss. MIT.Google Scholar
Tasmowski, L.; and Zribi-Hertz, A.
(eds) 1992De la musique à la linguistique. Hommages à Nicolas Ruwet. [Communication and Cognition.] Gent.Google Scholar
Zwart, J. -W.
1992Verb movement and complementizer agreement. Talk given at GLOW. Lisbon.Google Scholar