Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 18:2 (1994) ► pp.489495
References (13)
References
Aertsen, Henk; and Jeffers, Robert J. (eds). 1993. Historical linguistics 1989. Papers from the 9th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahlqvist, Anders (ed.). 1982. Papers from the 5th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 1973. “Abductive and deductive change”. Language 491: 765–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anttila, Raimo. 1992. “Historical explanation and historical linguistics”. In: Davis, Garry W.; and Iverson, Gregory K. (eds), Explanation in historical linguistics, 17–39. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1993. “On proposed universals of grammatical borrowing”. In: Aertsen and Jeffers. 91–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.; and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S. 1989. “Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change”. Language Variation and Change 11: 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1991. How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1993. “On the social origins of language change”. In: Jones, Charles (ed.). Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 215–36. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1991. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1991. “Sorting out the variables in sociolinguistic theory”. American Speech 661: 33–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice. 1992. “Variation and change in Yiddish subordinate clause word order”. Natural language and linguistic Theory 101: 595–640. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel; Labov, William; Herzog, Marvin I.; 1968. “Empirical foundations for a theory of language change”. In: Lehmann, W. P.; and Malkiel, Y. (eds), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium, 95–189. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar