Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 18:2 (1994) ► pp.510–521
Book review

Irmengard Rauch, Gerald F. Carr & Robert L. Kyes (eds). On Germanic linguistics. Issues and methods.Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992. viii + 416 pp. [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, 68].

Reviewed by
| University of Maryland, College Park,
Published online: 1 January 1994
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18.2.09fag
References (24)
References
Arndt, Erwin. 1962. Luthers deutsches Sprachschaffen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Blackburn, F. A. 1882. “The change of p to t in the Orrmulum”. American Journal of Philology 31: 46–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Kevin. 1989. The Scandinavian tonal accents: Towards a new theory of origin. University of Alberta M.A. thesis.Google Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram. 1978. Ausdrucksweisen der Sprechereinstellung im Deutschen und Englischen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chirita, Diana. 1988. Der Ausgleich des Ablauts im starken Präteritum im Frühneuhochdeutschen. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cook, Nada. 1993. A contrastive study of verbal aspect in German and Serbo-Croatian. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
d’Alquen, Richard J. E. 1988. Germanic accent, grammatical change and the laws of unaccented syllables. New York/Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Friedrichsen, G. W. S. 1926. The Gothic version of the Gospels. London: Humphrey Milford.Google Scholar
Kendall, Calvin B. 1983. “The metrical grammar of Beowulf. Displacement”. Speculum 58: 1.1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. “‘Elsewhere’ in phonology”. In: Anderson, Stephen R.; and Kiparsky, Paul (eds), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 93–106. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Kock, Axel. 1901. Die alt- und neuschwedische Akzentuierung. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Hans. 1933. “Zur Wortstellung und Betonung im Altgermanischen”. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 571: 1–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Thoughts on grammaticalization. A programmatic sketch. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaften der Universitt.Google Scholar
. 1985. “Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change”. Lingua e Stile 20(3): 303–318.Google Scholar
Massam, Diane. 1985. Case theory and the projection principle. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Murray, Robert; and Vennemann, Theo. 1983. “Sound change and syllable structure in Germanic phonology”. Language 591: 514–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niles, John D. 1983. Beowulf: The poem and its tradition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M.; and Zaenen, Annie. 1984. “The indefinite extraposition construction in Dutch and German”. In: Perlmutter, David M.; and Rosen, Carol G. (eds), Studies in relational grammar 21, 171–216. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roediger, Max. 1893. Paradigmata zur altsächsischen Grammatik. 2nd ed. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Twaddell, W. Freeman. 1938. “A note on Old High German umlaut”. Monatshefte 301: 177–181.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Philosophy in linguistics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voyles, Joseph. 1991. “A history of OHG i-umlaut”. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 1131: 159–194.Google Scholar