Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 42:4 (2018) ► pp.847885
References (41)
References
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Jaume Mateu. 2013. Satellite-framed Latin vs. verb-framed Romance: A syntactic approach. Probus: International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics 25(2). 227–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aske, Jon. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 151. 1–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John, Beth Levin & Shiao Tham. 2010. The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46(3). 331–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. & Dan Isaac Slobin (eds.) 1994. Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguisitic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chen, Liang & Jiangsheng Guo. 2009. Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently framed language. Journal of Pragmatics 41(9). 1749–1766. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William, Jóhanna Barðdal, Willem Hollmann, Violeta Sotirova & Chiaki Taoka. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Hans C. Boas (ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar (Constructional Approaches to Language 10), 201–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa. 2012. Motion events in English: The emergence and diachrony of Manner salience from Old English to Late Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 331. 29–85.Google Scholar
Guo, Jiansheng, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Şeyda Özcaliskan (eds.). 2009. Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 309–401. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2004. Motion events in Basque narratives. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, 89–112. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2009. Path Salience in Motion Events. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Kei Nakamura, & Seyda Őzçalişkan (eds.), Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 403–414. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ji, Yinglin, Henriëtte Hendriks & Maya Hickmann. 2011. The expression of caused motion events in Chinese and in English: Some typological issues. Linguistics 49(5). 1041–1077. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta. 2006. The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspective. In Maya Hickmann & Stephane Robert (eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Continuity and change in the representation of motion events in French. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Şeyda Özçalışkan (eds.), Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 415–425. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lamarre, Christine. 2003. Hànyǔ kōngjiān wèiyí shìjiàn de yǔyán biǎodá – jiānlùn shùqūshì de jǐ gè wèntí [Linguistic encoding of motion events in Chinese: Several issuses on verb-directional constructions]. Xiàndài zhōngguóyǔ yánjiū [Studies on Modern Chinese Language] (5). 1–18. [published in Japan].Google Scholar
Li, Fengxiang. 1993. A diachronic study of V-V Compound in Chinese. Buffalo, NY: SUNY at Buffalo dissertation.Google Scholar
. 1997. Cross-linguistic lexicalization patterns: Diachronic evidence from verb-complement compounds in Chinese. Sprachtypologie und Unversalienforschung 31. 229–252.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yo. 2003. Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In Shuji Chiba et al. (eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A festschrift for Masaru Kajita, 403–418. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain. 2006. Motion events in Chinese: A diachronic study of directional complements. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 121–138. Amesterdam, Phiadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Şeyda & Dan Isaac Slobin. 1999. Learning how to search for the frog: Expression of Manner of motion in English, Spanish, and Turkish. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, vol. 21, 541–552. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. Codability effects of the expressions of Manner of motion in Turkish and English. In A. Sumru Özsoy, D. Akar, M. Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, E. Erguvanlı-Taylan, & A. Aksu-Koç (eds.), Studies in Turkish Linguistics, 259–270. Istanbul: Bogaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, M. & Beth Levin. 2010. Reflections on Manner/Result Complementarity. In M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron & I. Sichel (eds.), Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure, 21–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senghas, Ann, Sotaro Kita, & Asli Özyürek. 2004. Children Creating Core Properties of Language: Evidence from an Emerging Sign Language in Nicaragua. Science. 17 September 305(5691). 1779–1782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan. 2003. Xiàndài hànyǔ dòngbǔ jiégòu de lèixíngxué kǎochá [The typological investigations of motion resultative constructions in Modern Chinese]. Shìjiè hànyǔ jiàoxué [Chinese Teaching in the World] 31. 17–23.Google Scholar
Shi, Wenlei. 2014a. Yǔyán kùcáng xiǎnhèxìng zhī lìshí kuòzhāng jíqí xiàoyīng: Dòngqūshì zài hànyǔshǐ shàng de fāzhǎn [Diachronic extension of Linguistic Inventory Mightiness: Evolution of Directional RVC pattern in the history of Chinese], International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 21. 293–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. Hànyǔ Yùndòng Shìjiàn Cíhuà Lèixíng de Lìshí Kǎochá [Evolution of Lexicalization Pattern of Motion Events: A Case Study from Chinese]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Shi, Wenlei & Yicheng Wu. 2014. Which way to move: The evolution of motion expressions in Chinese. Linguistics 52(5). 1237–1292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, DanIsaac. 1996. Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, 195–219. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan Isaac. 2000. Verblized Events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In Suzanne Niemeier & René Dirven (eds.), Evidence for Linguistic Relativity [Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series IV, Current issues in linguistic theory], 107–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating Events in Narrative. Vol 2: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, 219–257. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 2005. Relating narrative events in translation. In Dorit D. Ravid & Hava B. Shyldkrot (eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman, 115–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. What makes Manner of motion salient: Explorations in linguistic typoloty, discourse, and cognition. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistics systems and cognitive categories, 59–81. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolova, Natalya I. 2008. From satellite-framed Latin to verb-framed Romance: Late Latin as an intermediate stage. In R. Wright (ed.), Latin vulgaire-latin Tardif, viii1, 253–262. Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann.Google Scholar
2015. Cognitive linguistics and lexical change: Motion verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stringer, David. 2002. The syntax of Paths and boundaries. The 37th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol.21: 139–154.Google Scholar
Strömqvist, Sven & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.) 2004. Relating Events in Narrative. Vol 2: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, 219–257. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tai, James H.-Y. 2003. Cognitive relativism: Resultative construction in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 4(2). 301–316.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol.3: Grammatical categories and lexicon, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 480–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 21. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Şeyda Özcaliskan (eds.), Crosslinguisitic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 309–401. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Chen, Shujun & Lihuan Wu
2023. Variable motion encoding within Chinese: a usage-based perspective. Language and Cognition 15:3  pp. 480 ff. DOI logo
Tusun, Alimujiang
2022. Uyghur–Chinese Adult Bilinguals’ Construal of Voluntary Motion Events. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Tusun, Alimujiang
2023. Uyghur–Chinese early successive bilingual children's acquisition of voluntary motion expressions. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Poiret, Rafaël, Simon Mille & Haitao Liu
2021. Paraphrase and parallel treebank for the comparison of French and Chinese syntax. Languages in Contrast 21:2  pp. 298 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.