Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 42:4 (2018) ► pp. 847–885

The typological change of motion expressions in Chinese revisited

Motion events in Old Chinese and its Modern Chinese translation

| Zhejiang University
| Zhejiang University
| Indiana University Bloomington
This paper reports on a corpus-based study aimed at reexamining the typological status and diachronic change of motion expressions in Chinese, drawing on parallel texts consisting of autonomous motion expressions in Old Chinese (OC) and its Modern Chinese (MoC) translation. The results show that MoC significantly differs from OC both in the preference of lexicalization patterns (Talmyan typology) and semantic components distributed in discourse (Slobinian typology) when narrating similar motion scenes. However, these results fail to support the viewpoint that Chinese has undergone a change from a verb- to a satellite-frame (Li 1993; Talmy 2000; Peyraube 2006; Shi & Wu 2014). It is argued that (i) the Talmyan typology and the Slobinian typology should be treated separately. In Talmyan typology, the diachrony of Chinese demonstrates the change of a V- to a parallel-frame, in that satellite- and verb-framed constructions in MoC have equal frequency and show no bias for the encoding of subtypes of autonomous motion. In Slobinian typology, MoC remains as a Path-salient language, as it gives considerable weight to the expression of Path; (ii) the dominant lexicalization pattern in a language varies from one sub-domain of motion to another (see also Lamarre 2003), and thus the typology of motion expressions is sub-domain-specific; and (iii) motivating forces and blocking forces, furthermore, co-exist diachronically for the typological evolution of motion encoding due to the idiosyncrasy of the morphosyntactic system.
Keywords: typological change, motion event, lexicalization pattern, Path salience, Manner salience, Chinese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Corpus selection and description
    • 2.2Data transcription
  • 3.Lexicalization patterns
    • 3.1Lexicalization patterns of autonomous motion events
    • 3.2Lexicalization patterns of Manner and Path encoded simultaneously
  • 4.Semantic components in discourse
    • 4.1Encoding of Manner in discourse
      • 4.1.1Types of Manner verbs
      • 4.1.2Tokens of Manner verbs
      • 4.1.3Adverbial elements that encode Manner
    • 4.2Encoding of Path in discourse
      • 4.2.1Types of Path verbs
      • 4.2.2Tokens of Path verbs
    • 4.3Emergence of Cause
    • 4.4Encoding of Ground
  • 5.General discussion
    • 5.1Reassessing the typological change of motion expressions in Chinese
    • 5.2Domain-specific variation in motion encoding
    • 5.3Typological shift and maintenance of motion encoding
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 04 February 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18010.shi
References

References

Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Jaume Mateu
2013 Satellite-framed Latin vs. verb-framed Romance: A syntactic approach. Probus: International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics 25(2). 227–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aske, Jon
1989 Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society 151. 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John, Beth Levin & Shiao Tham
2010 The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46(3). 331–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. & Dan Isaac Slobin
(eds.) 1994 Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguisitic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Chen, Liang & Jiangsheng Guo
2009 Motion events in Chinese novels: Evidence for an equipollently framed language. Journal of Pragmatics 41(9). 1749–1766. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William, Jóhanna Barðdal, Willem Hollmann, Violeta Sotirova & Chiaki Taoka
2010 Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Hans C. Boas (ed.), Contrastive studies in construction grammar (Constructional Approaches to Language 10), 201–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
2012 Motion events in English: The emergence and diachrony of Manner salience from Old English to Late Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 331. 29–85.Google Scholar
Guo, Jiansheng, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Şeyda Özcaliskan
(eds.) 2009 Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 309–401. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide
2004 Motion events in Basque narratives. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, 89–112. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2009 Path Salience in Motion Events. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Kei Nakamura, & Seyda Őzçalişkan (eds.), Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 403–414. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ji, Yinglin, Henriëtte Hendriks & Maya Hickmann
2011 The expression of caused motion events in Chinese and in English: Some typological issues. Linguistics 49(5). 1041–1077. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta
2006 The semantic structure of motion verbs in French: Typological perspective. In Maya Hickmann & Stephane Robert (eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 Continuity and change in the representation of motion events in French. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Şeyda Özçalışkan (eds.), Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 415–425. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lamarre, Christine
2003 Hànyǔ kōngjiān wèiyí shìjiàn de yǔyán biǎodá – jiānlùn shùqūshì de jǐ gè wèntí [Linguistic encoding of motion events in Chinese: Several issuses on verb-directional constructions]. Xiàndài zhōngguóyǔ yánjiū [Studies on Modern Chinese Language] (5). 1–18. [published in Japan].Google Scholar
Li, Fengxiang
1993 A diachronic study of V-V Compound in Chinese. Buffalo, NY: SUNY at Buffalo dissertation.Google Scholar
1997 Cross-linguistic lexicalization patterns: Diachronic evidence from verb-complement compounds in Chinese. Sprachtypologie und Unversalienforschung 31. 229–252.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yo
2003 Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In Shuji Chiba et al. (eds.), Empirical and theoretical investigations into language: A festschrift for Masaru Kajita, 403–418. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain
2006 Motion events in Chinese: A diachronic study of directional complements. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 121–138. Amesterdam, Phiadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, Şeyda & Dan Isaac Slobin
1999 Learning how to search for the frog: Expression of Manner of motion in English, Spanish, and Turkish. In A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, vol. 21, 541–552. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2003 Codability effects of the expressions of Manner of motion in Turkish and English. In A. Sumru Özsoy, D. Akar, M. Nakipoğlu-Demiralp, E. Erguvanlı-Taylan, & A. Aksu-Koç (eds.), Studies in Turkish Linguistics, 259–270. Istanbul: Bogaziçi University Press.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, M. & Beth Levin
2010 Reflections on Manner/Result Complementarity. In M. Rappaport Hovav, E. Doron & I. Sichel (eds.), Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure, 21–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Senghas, Ann, Sotaro Kita, & Asli Özyürek
2004 Children Creating Core Properties of Language: Evidence from an Emerging Sign Language in Nicaragua. Science 17 September 305(5691). 1779–1782. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan
2003 Xiàndài hànyǔ dòngbǔ jiégòu de lèixíngxué kǎochá [The typological investigations of motion resultative constructions in Modern Chinese]. Shìjiè hànyǔ jiàoxué [Chinese Teaching in the World] 31. 17–23.Google Scholar
Shi, Wenlei
2014a Yǔyán kùcáng xiǎnhèxìng zhī lìshí kuòzhāng jíqí xiàoyīng: Dòngqūshì zài hànyǔshǐ shàng de fāzhǎn [Diachronic extension of Linguistic Inventory Mightiness: Evolution of Directional RVC pattern in the history of Chinese], International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 21. 293–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b Hànyǔ Yùndòng Shìjiàn Cíhuà Lèixíng de Lìshí Kǎochá [Evolution of Lexicalization Pattern of Motion Events: A Case Study from Chinese]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Shi, Wenlei & Yicheng Wu
2014 Which way to move: The evolution of motion expressions in Chinese. Linguistics 52(5). 1237–1292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, DanIsaac
1996 Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, 195–219. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan Isaac
2000 Verblized Events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In Suzanne Niemeier & René Dirven (eds.), Evidence for Linguistic Relativity [Amsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series IV, Current issues in linguistic theory], 107–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 The many ways to search for a frog. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating Events in Narrative. Vol 2: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, 219–257. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2005 Relating narrative events in translation. In Dorit D. Ravid & Hava B. Shyldkrot (eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman, 115–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 What makes Manner of motion salient: Explorations in linguistic typoloty, discourse, and cognition. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in Languages: Linguistics systems and cognitive categories, 59–81. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stolova, Natalya I.
2008 From satellite-framed Latin to verb-framed Romance: Late Latin as an intermediate stage. In R. Wright (ed.), Latin vulgaire-latin Tardif, viii1, 253–262. Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann.Google Scholar
2015 Cognitive linguistics and lexical change: Motion verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stringer, David
2002 The syntax of Paths and boundaries. The 37th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol.21: 139–154.Google Scholar
Strömqvist, Sven & Ludo Verhoeven
(eds.) 2004 Relating Events in Narrative. Vol 2: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, 219–257. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tai, James H.-Y.
2003 Cognitive relativism: Resultative construction in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 4(2). 301–316.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol.3: Grammatical categories and lexicon, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1991 Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 480–519. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 21. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2009 Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Şeyda Özcaliskan (eds.), Crosslinguisitic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 309–401. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Verkerk, Annemarie
2015 Where do all the motion verbs come from? The speed of development of manner verbs and path verbs in Indo-European. Diachronica 32(1). 69–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Poiret, Rafaël, Simon Mille & Haitao Liu
2021. Paraphrase and parallel treebank for the comparison of French and Chinese syntax. Languages in Contrast 21:2 ► pp. 298 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.