This study investigates clause constructions in Auslan. It looks at the alignment of constituent semantic role
with constituent position and order in clauses, changes in the morphology of signs according to position and/or role, and the
interpretation of omitted arguments. The aim is to determine if there are grammatical relations in Auslan. The most frequent
constituent order parallels English, thus Auslan might be said to also instantiate a basic SVO word order. However, every possible
constituent order pattern is also attested without there being other coding and behavioural properties associated with grammatical
relations that could explain this flexibility. I conclude that constituent order in Auslan is the result of the interaction of
pragmatic and semantic factors, visual representation, and language contact with English, rather than autochthonous grammatical
relations. Auslan grammar draws on both so-called gestural and so-called linguistic resources at the clause level, not just at the
word (sign) level.
Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.). 2000. Usage Based Models of Language. Stanford, California: CSLI.
Benedicto, Elena & Diane Brentari. 2004. Where Did All the Arguments Go? Argument-Changing Properties of Classifiers in ASL. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22(4). 743–810.
Bhat, D. N. S.1991. Grammatical Relations: The evidence against their necessity and universality. London: Routledge.
Bolinger, Dwight L.1983. Intonation and gesture. American Speech 581. 156–74.
Bos, Heleen. 1995. Pronoun copy in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In H. Bos & T. Schermer (eds.), Sign Language Research 1994: Proceedings of the Fourth European Congress on Sign Language Research, Munich, September 1–3, 1994, 121–47. Hamburg: Signum Press.
Bouchard, Denis. 1997. Sign languages & language universals: the status of order and position in grammar. Sign Language Studies 911. 101–70.
Bouchard, Denis & Collette Dubuisson. 1995. Grammar, order and position of Wh- signs in Quebec Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 871. 99–139.
Boyes Braem, Penny. 1999. Rhythmic temporal patterns in the singing of deaf early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language. Language and Speech 42(2–3). 177–208.
Bybee, Joan. 2007. Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boyes Braem, P., Fournier, M.-L., Rickli, F., Corazza, S., Franchi, M.-L., & Volterra, V. (1990). A Comparison of Techniques for Expressing Semantic Roles and Locative Relations in Two Different Sign Languages. In W. H. Edmondson & F. Karlsson (Eds.),
SLR ’87 Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research
,
Lappeenranta, Finland
July 15-19, 1987 (pp. 114–120). Hamburg: Signum Verlag.
Cecchetto, Carlo. 2012. Sentence types. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign Language: An International Handbook, 292–315. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Chen Pichler, Deborah. 2011. Using early ASL word order to shed light on word order variability in sign language. In M. Andersen, K. Bentzen & M. Westergaard (eds.), Variation in the Input: Studies in The Acquisition of Word Order (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics), 157–77. The Netherlands: Springer.
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2016). Creating Language: Integrating Evolution, Acquisition, and Processing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Coerts, Jane. 1994. Constituent Order in Sign Language of The Netherlands. In M. Brennan & G. H. Turner (eds.), Word Order Issues in Sign Language. Working papers, 47–72. Durham, UK: International Sign Linguistics Association.
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. In W. P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language, Austin: University of Texas Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Comrie, Bernard. 1988. Coreference and conjunction reduction in grammar and discourse. In J. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals: Basil Blackwell.
Cormier, Kearsy, Jordan Fenlon & Adam Schembri. 2015a. Indicating verbs in British Sign Language favour motivated use of space. Open Linguistics 11. 684–707.
Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith & Sehyr Sevcikova. 2015b. Rethinking constructed action. Sign Language & Linguistics 18(2).
Crasborn, Onno, Els van der Kooij & Johan Ros. 2012. On the weight of phrase-final prosodic words in a single language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2(1). 1–21.
Croft, William. 1990. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Croft, William and D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cuxac, Christian. 2000. La Langue des Signes Française (LSF): Les voies de l’iconicité. Paris: Ophrys.
Deuchar, Margaret. 1978. Sign Language Diglossia in a British Deaf Community. Sign Language Studies 171. 347–56.
Deuchar, Margaret. 1983. Is British Sign Language an SVO Language? In J. G. Kyle & B. Woll (eds.), Language in Sign: an international perspective on sign language, 69–76. London: Croom Helm.
Dixon, R. M. W.1979. Ergativity. Language 551(59–138).
Dixon, R. M. W.2010. Basic Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dryer, Matthew S.1997a. Are grammatical relations universal? In J. L. Bybee, J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language Function and Language Type, 115–44. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dryer, Matthew S.2013. Order of Subject, Object and Verb. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds.), World atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, [URL]
Enfield, Nick J.2009. The Anatomy of Meaning: Sign, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elizabeth. 2002. Grammatical relations in Danish Sign Language: topic and subject. In A. Pajunen (ed.), Mimesis, Sign, and the Evolution of Language (Publications in General Linguistics 3), 5–40. Turku, Finland: University of Turku.
Fenlon, Jordan, Adam Schembri & Kearsy Cormier. 2018. Modification of indicating verbs in British Sign Language: A corpus-based study. Language 94(1). 84–118.
Ferrara, Lindsay. 2012. The grammar of depiction: Exploring gesture and language in Australian Sign Language (Auslan). Sydney: Macquarie University Department of Linguistics thesis.
Ferrara, Lindsay and Gabrielle Hodge. 2018. Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 91 (Article 716).
Ferrara, Lindsay & Trevor Johnston. 2014. Elaborating who’s what: A study of depiction and grammar in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Australian Journal of Linguistics 34(2). 193–215.
Fischer, Susan D.1975. Influences on word order change in American Sign Language. In C. Li (ed.), Word order and word order change, 1–25. Austin, TX: University of Texas.
Fischer, Susan D. & Wynne Janis. 1990. Verb Sandwiches in ASL. In S. Prillwitz & T. Vollhaber (eds.), Current Trends in European Sign Language Research: Proceedings of the 3rd European Congress on Sign Language Research Hamburg July 26–29, 1989, 279–94. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.
Friedman, L. A.1976. The Manifestation of Subject, Object, and Topic in American Sign Language. In C. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 125–48. New York: Academic Press.
Goldberg, Adele E.1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago and London: University of Chicago.
Goldberg, Adele E.2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, Michael A. K.1974. The place of ‘Functional Sentence Perspective’ in the system of linguistic description. In F. Danes (ed.), Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, 43–53. Prague: Academia.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11(1). 119–32.
Hodge, Gabrielle. 2013. Patterns from a signed language corpus: Clause-like units in Auslan (Australian sign language). Sydney: Macquarie University, Department of Linguistics doctoral dissertation.
Hodge, Gabrielle & Trevor Johnston. 2014. Points, depictions, gestures and enactment: Partly lexical and non-lexical signs as core elements of single clause-like units in Auslan (Australian sign language). Australian Journal of Linguistics 34(2). 262–91.
Hopper, P. J. (1998). Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 155–175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jantunen, Tommi. 2008. Fixed and Free: Order of the Verbal Predicate and Its Core Arguments in Declarative Transitive Clauses in Finish Sign Language. SKY Journal of Linguistics 211. 83–123.
Jantunen, Tommi. 2013. Ellipsis in Finnish Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36(03). 303–32.
Jantunen, Tommi. 2017. Constructed Action, the Clause and the Nature of Syntax in Finnish Sign Language. Open Linguistics 31. 65–85.
Janzen, Terry. 2017. Composite utterances in a signed language: Topic constructions and perspective-taking in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 28(3). 511–38.
Janzen, Terry, Barbara O’Dea & Barbara Shaffer. 2001. The construal of events: passives in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 1(3). 281–310.
Johnston, Trevor. 1989. Auslan: The sign language of the Australian deaf community. Sydney: University of Sydney doctoral dissertation.
Johnston, Trevor. 1991. Spatial syntax and spatial semantics in the inflection of signs for the marking of person and location in Auslan. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 2(1). 29–62.
Johnston, Trevor. 1996. Function and medium in the forms of linguistic expression found in a sign language. In W. H. Edmondson & R. B. Wilbur (eds.), International Review of Sign Linguistics, 57–94. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Johnston, Trevor. 2008. The Auslan Archive and Corpus. In D. Nathan (ed.), The Endangered Languages Archive – [URL], London: Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Documentation Project, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
Johnston, Trevor. 2013b. Formational and functional characteristics of pointing signs in a corpus of Auslan (Australian sign language): are the data sufficient to posit a grammatical class of ‘pronouns’ in Auslan?Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9(1). 109–59.
Johnston, Trevor. 2017. The Auslan Corpus Annotation Guidelines, downloadable from [URL] [Last updated, November 2017].
Johnston, Trevor. 2018. The role of headshake in negation in Auslan (Australian Sign Language): implications for signed language typology. Linguistic Typology 22(2). 185–231.
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri. 2010. Variation, lexicalization and grammaticalization in signed languages. In B. Garcia & M. Derycke (eds.), Sourds et langue des signs: Normes et variation. Langage et société, 5–15. Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
Johnston, Trevor, Myriam Vermeerbergen, Adam Schembri & Lorraine Leeson. 2007. “Real data are messy”: Considering cross-linguistic analysis of constituent ordering in Auslan, VGT, and ISL. In P. Perniss, R. Pfau & M. Steinbach (eds.), Visible Variation: Comparative Studies on Sign Language Structure, 163–205. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Keenan, Edward L.1976. Towards a universal definition of “subject”. In C. N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, New York, NY: Academic Press.
Keenan, Edward L.1985. Relative clauses. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Volume II: Complex Constructions, 141–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kendon, Adam. 2014. Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of ‘language’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal SocietySeries B, 369 (1651): 20139203.
Kimmelman, Vadim. 2011. Doubling in RSL and NGT: towards a unified explanation. Workshop “Information Structure: Empirical Perspectives on Theory”, Potsdam, December 2011.
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The Signs of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kockelman, Paul. 2005. The semiotic stance. Semiotica 157(1–4). 233–304.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W.1998. Conceptualization, symbolization, and grammar. In M. Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 1–39. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Langacker, Ronald W.2005. Construction Grammars: cognitive, radical, and less so. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & S. Peña Cervel (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics & interdisciplinary interaction, 101–59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald W.2008a. Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LaPolla, Randy J.2006. On Grammatical Relations as Constraints on Referent Identification. In T. Tsunoda & T. Kageyam (eds.), Voice and Grammatical Relations: Festschrift for Masayoshi Shibatani (Typological Studies in Language), 139–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
LaPolla, Randy J. & Dory Poa. 2006. On Describing Word Order. In F. Ameka, A. Dench & N. Evans (eds.), Catching Language: The Standing Challenge of Grammar Writing, 269–95. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leeson, Lorraine & J. I. Saeed. 2012. Word Order. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign Language: An International Handbook, 245–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Liddell, Scott K.1980. American Sign Language Syntax. The Hague: Mouton.
Liddell, Scott K.2000. Indicating verbs and pronouns: Pointing away from agreement. In K. Emmorey & H. Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 303–20. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Massone, Maria Ignacia & Monica Curiel. 2004. Sign order in Argentine Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 5(1). 63–93.
Mathur, Gaurav & Christian Rathmann. 2010. Verb agreement in sign language morphology. In D. Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 173–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mathur, Gaurav & Christian Rathmann. 2012. Verb Agreement. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 136–57. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
McKee, Rachel, Adam Schembri, David McKee & Trevor Johnston. 2011. Variable “subject” expression in Australian Sign Language and New Zealand Sign Language. Language Variation and Change 23(1). 1375–398.
Meir, Irit, Mark Aronoff, Carl Börstell, So-One Hwang, Deniz Ilkabasaran, Itamar Kastner, Ryan Lepic, Adi Lifshitz Ben-Basat, Carol A. Padden & Wendy Sandler. 2017. The effect of being human and the basis of grammatical word order: Insights from novel communication systems and young sign languages. Cognition 1581. 189–207.
Nadeau, Marie & Louis Desouvrey. 1994. Word Order in Sentences with Directional Verbs in Quebec Sign Language. In I. Ahlgren, B. Bergman & M. Brennan (eds.), Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, vol. 11, 149–58. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.
Napoli, D. J. & Rachel Sutton-Spence. 2014. Order of the major constituents in sign languages: implications for all language. Frontiers in Psychology 51.
Neidle, Carol, Judy Anne Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Ben Bahan & Robert Lee. 2000. The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Oomen, Marloes & Roland Pfau. 2017. Signing NOT (or not): A typological perspective on standard negation in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Linguistic Typology 21(1). 1–51.
Padden, Carol. 1988. The Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland.
Parmentier, Richard. 1994. Sign in Society: Studies in Semiotic Anthropology. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Payne, Thomas E.1997. Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1955. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover.
Petronio, Karen & Diane Lillo-Martin. 1997. WH-Movement and the Position of Spec-CP: Evidence from American Sign Language. Language 731. 18–57.
Pinsonneault, Dominique. 1994. Verb echoes in LSQ. In M. Brennan & G. Turner (eds.), Word order issues in sign language: Working papers (presented at a workshop held in Durham 18–22 September 1991), 113–31. Durham: ISLA.
Puupponen, Anna. 2019. Towards understanding nonmanuality: a semiotic treatment of signers’ head movements. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 4(1), 391. 31–39.
Quinto-Pozos, David & Sarika Mehta. 2010. Register variation in mimetic gestural complements to signed language. Journal of Pragmatics 42(3). 557–84.
de Quandros, Ronice Muller & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2010. Clause Structure. In D. Brentari (ed.), Sign Languages, 225–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rankin, Miako. 2013. Form, Meaning, and Focus in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Schembri, A., K. Cormier & J. Fenlon. 2018. Indicating verbs as typologically unique constructions: Reconsidering verb ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3(1), 891. 81–40.
Schembri, Adam, Kearsy Cormier, Jordan Fenlon & Trevor Johnston. 2018. Sociolinguistic Typology and Sign Languages. Frontiers in Psychology 91. 200.
Taub, Sarah. 2001. Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Valli, Clayton, Ceil Lucas & Kirstin J. Mulrooney. 2005. Linguistics of American Sign Language: A resource text for ASL users. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Volterra, Virginia, A. Laudanna, Serena Corazza, E. Radutsky & F. Natale. 1984. Italian Sign Language: the order of elements in the declarative sentence. In F. Loncke, P. Boyes-Braem & Y. Lebrun (eds.), Recent Research on European Sign Languages, 19–48. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Wilbur, Ronnie B.1994. Foregrounding structures in American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics 221. 647–72.
Wilcox, Sherman & Corrine Occhino. 2016. Constructing signs: Place as a symbolic structure in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics 27(3). 371–404.
Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, A. Klassmann & Han Sloetjes. 2006. ELAN: a Professional Framework for Multimodality Research. Proceedings of LREC 2006, Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 1556–59. Paris: ELAR.
Zeshan, Ulrike. 2004. Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology 81. 1–58.
Zeshan, Ulrike (ed.). 2006. Sign Language Typology 1: Interrogative and Negative Constructions in Sign Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zima, Elisabeth & Alexander Bergs. 2017. Multimodality and construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 31(s1 (Jun 2017).
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Willoughby, L., R. T. Smith & T. Johnston
2024. The GeSCA repository: Gesture and Sign Corpus of Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics 44:2-3 ► pp. 220 ff.
2023. Why we need a gradient approach to word order. Linguistics 61:4 ► pp. 825 ff.
Beukeleers, Inez & Myriam Vermeerbergen
2022. Show Me What You’ve B/Seen: A Brief History of Depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Hou, Lynn
2022. A Usage-Based Proposal for Argument Structure of Directional Verbs in American Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Hou, Lynn
2022. LOOKing for multi-word expressions in American Sign Language. Cognitive Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 291 ff.
Motamedi, Yasamin, Kenny Smith, Marieke Schouwstra, Jennifer Culbertson & Simon Kirby
2021. The emergence of systematic argument distinctions in artificial sign languages. Journal of Language Evolution 6:2 ► pp. 77 ff.
Raičević Bajić, Dragana, Myriam Vermeerbergen, Adam Schembri & Mieke Van Herreweghe
2021. Constituent order in Serbian Sign Language declarative clauses. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1
[no author supplied]
2022. Bibliography. Journal of Sociolinguistics 26:1 ► pp. 137 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.