Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 43:4 (2019) ► pp. 941996
References

References

Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer
(eds.) 2000Usage Based Models of Language. Stanford, California: CSLI.Google Scholar
Benedicto, Elena & Diane Brentari
2004Where Did All the Arguments Go? Argument-Changing Properties of Classifiers in ASL. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22(4). 743–810. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhat, D. N. S.
1991Grammatical Relations: The evidence against their necessity and universality. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L.
1983Intonation and gesture. American Speech 58. 156–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bos, Heleen
1995Pronoun copy in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In H. Bos & T. Schermer (eds.), Sign Language Research 1994: Proceedings of the Fourth European Congress on Sign Language Research, Munich, September 1–3, 1994, 121–47. Hamburg: Signum Press.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis
1997Sign languages & language universals: the status of order and position in grammar. Sign Language Studies 91. 101–70.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis & Collette Dubuisson
1995Grammar, order and position of Wh- signs in Quebec Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 87. 99–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyes Braem, Penny
1999Rhythmic temporal patterns in the singing of deaf early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language. Language and Speech 42(2–3). 177–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2007Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 989 ]
Boyes Braem, P., Fournier, M.-L., Rickli, F., Corazza, S., Franchi, M.-L., & Volterra, V.
(1990) A Comparison of Techniques for Expressing Semantic Roles and Locative Relations in Two Different Sign Languages. In W. H. Edmondson & F. Karlsson (Eds.), SLR ’87 Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research , Lappeenranta, Finland July 15-19, 1987 (pp. 114–120). Hamburg: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Paul J. Hopper
(eds.) 2001Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Beuzeville, Louise, Trevor Johnston & Adam Schembri
2009The Use of Space with Indicating Verbs in Auslan: A corpus based investigation. Sign Language & Linguistics 12(1). 53–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo
2012Sentence types. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign Language: An International Handbook, 292–315. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen Pichler, Deborah
2011Using early ASL word order to shed light on word order variability in sign language. In M. Andersen, K. Bentzen & M. Westergaard (eds.), Variation in the Input: Studies in The Acquisition of Word Order (Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics), 157–77. The Netherlands: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N.
(2016) Creating Language: Integrating Evolution, Acquisition, and Processing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coerts, Jane
1994Constituent Order in Sign Language of The Netherlands. In M. Brennan & G. H. Turner (eds.), Word Order Issues in Sign Language. Working papers, 47–72. Durham, UK: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Cogill-Koez, Dorothea
2000aSigned language classifier predicates: linguistic structures or schematic visual representation? Sign Language and Linguistics 3(2). 153–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000bA model of signed language ‘classifier predicates’ as templated visual representation. Sign Language and Linguistics 3(2). 209–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1978Ergativity. In W. P. Lehmann (ed.), Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language, Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1981Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
1988Coreference and conjunction reduction in grammar and discourse. In J. Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Jordan Fenlon & Adam Schembri
2015aIndicating verbs in British Sign Language favour motivated use of space. Open Linguistics 1. 684–707. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith & Sehyr Sevcikova
2015bRethinking constructed action. Sign Language & Linguistics 18(2). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno, Els van der Kooij & Johan Ros
2012On the weight of phrase-final prosodic words in a single language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2(1). 1–21.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1990Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2001Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William and D. Alan Cruse
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 990 ]
Cuxac, Christian
2000La Langue des Signes Française (LSF): Les voies de l’iconicité. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Danes, Frantisek
(ed.) 1974Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective. Prague: Academia. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deuchar, Margaret
1978Sign Language Diglossia in a British Deaf Community. Sign Language Studies 17. 347–56.Google Scholar
1983Is British Sign Language an SVO Language? In J. G. Kyle & B. Woll (eds.), Language in Sign: an international perspective on sign language, 69–76. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1979Ergativity. Language 55(59–138). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Basic Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1997aAre grammatical relations universal? In J. L. Bybee, J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language Function and Language Type, 115–44. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997bOn the Six-Way Word Order Typology. Studies in Language (21). 69–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Order of Subject, Object and Verb. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds.), World atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, http'/​/wals​.info​/chapter​/81
Enfield, Nick J.
2009The Anatomy of Meaning: Sign, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elizabeth
2002Grammatical relations in Danish Sign Language: topic and subject. In A. Pajunen (ed.), Mimesis, Sign, and the Evolution of Language (Publications in General Linguistics 3), 5–40. Turku, Finland: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Fenlon, Jordan, Adam Schembri & Kearsy Cormier
2018Modification of indicating verbs in British Sign Language: A corpus-based study. Language 94(1). 84–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, Lindsay
2012The grammar of depiction: Exploring gesture and language in Australian Sign Language (Auslan). Sydney: Macquarie University Department of Linguistics thesis.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Lindsay and Gabrielle Hodge
2018Language as Description, Indication, and Depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 9 (Article 716). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, Lindsay & Trevor Johnston
2014Elaborating who’s what: A study of depiction and grammar in Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Australian Journal of Linguistics 34(2). 193–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Susan D.
1975Influences on word order change in American Sign Language. In C. Li (ed.), Word order and word order change, 1–25. Austin, TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan D. & Wynne Janis
1990Verb Sandwiches in ASL. In S. Prillwitz & T. Vollhaber (eds.), Current Trends in European Sign Language Research: Proceedings of the 3rd European Congress on Sign Language Research Hamburg July 26–29, 1989, 279–94. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar
Friedman, L. A.
1976The Manifestation of Subject, Object, and Topic in American Sign Language. In C. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 125–48. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1995Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 991 ]
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago and London: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1974The place of ‘Functional Sentence Perspective’ in the system of linguistic description. In F. Danes (ed.), Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, 43–53. Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2007Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11(1). 119–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Gabrielle
2013Patterns from a signed language corpus: Clause-like units in Auslan (Australian sign language). Sydney: Macquarie University, Department of Linguistics doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Hodge, Gabrielle & Trevor Johnston
2014Points, depictions, gestures and enactment: Partly lexical and non-lexical signs as core elements of single clause-like units in Auslan (Australian sign language). Australian Journal of Linguistics 34(2). 262–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J.
(1998) Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure (pp. 155–175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jantunen, Tommi
2008Fixed and Free: Order of the Verbal Predicate and Its Core Arguments in Declarative Transitive Clauses in Finish Sign Language. SKY Journal of Linguistics 21. 83–123.Google Scholar
2013Ellipsis in Finnish Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36(03). 303–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Constructed Action, the Clause and the Nature of Syntax in Finnish Sign Language. Open Linguistics 3. 65–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, Terry
2017Composite utterances in a signed language: Topic constructions and perspective-taking in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 28(3). 511–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, Terry, Barbara O’Dea & Barbara Shaffer
2001The construal of events: passives in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 1(3). 281–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Trevor
1989Auslan: The sign language of the Australian deaf community. Sydney: University of Sydney doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
1991Spatial syntax and spatial semantics in the inflection of signs for the marking of person and location in Auslan. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 2(1). 29–62.Google Scholar
1996Function and medium in the forms of linguistic expression found in a sign language. In W. H. Edmondson & R. B. Wilbur (eds.), International Review of Sign Linguistics, 57–94. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2008The Auslan Archive and Corpus. In D. Nathan (ed.), The Endangered Languages Archive – http://​elar​.soas​.ac​.uk​/languages, London: Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Documentation Project, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
[ p. 992 ]
2010From archive to corpus: transcription and annotation in the creation of signed language corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(1). 104–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013aTowards a comparative semiotics of pointing actions in signed and spoken languages. Gesture 13(2). 109–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bFormational and functional characteristics of pointing signs in a corpus of Auslan (Australian sign language): are the data sufficient to posit a grammatical class of ‘pronouns’ in Auslan? Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9(1). 109–59.Google Scholar
2017The Auslan Corpus Annotation Guidelines, downloadable from http://​www​.auslan​.org​.au​/about​/annotations/ [Last updated, November 2017].
2018The role of headshake in negation in Auslan (Australian Sign Language): implications for signed language typology. Linguistic Typology 22(2). 185–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri
2010Variation, lexicalization and grammaticalization in signed languages. In B. Garcia & M. Derycke (eds.), Sourds et langue des signs: Normes et variation. Langage et société, 5–15. Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor, Myriam Vermeerbergen, Adam Schembri & Lorraine Leeson
2007“Real data are messy”: Considering cross-linguistic analysis of constituent ordering in Auslan, VGT, and ISL. In P. Perniss, R. Pfau & M. Steinbach (eds.), Visible Variation: Comparative Studies on Sign Language Structure, 163–205. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L.
1976Towards a universal definition of “subject”. In C. N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985Relative clauses. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Volume II: Complex Constructions, 141–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam
2014Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of ‘language’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series B, 369 (1651): 20139203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kimmelman, Vadim
2011Doubling in RSL and NGT: towards a unified explanation. Workshop “Information Structure: Empirical Perspectives on Theory”, Potsdam, December 2011.Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi
1979The Signs of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kockelman, Paul
2005The semiotic stance. Semiotica 157(1–4). 233–304.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1998Conceptualization, symbolization, and grammar. In M. Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 1–39. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2005Construction Grammars: cognitive, radical, and less so. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & S. Peña Cervel (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics & interdisciplinary interaction, 101–59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008aCognitive grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 993 ]
2008bMetaphoric gesture and cognitive linguistics. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (eds.), Metaphor and gesture, 249–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
2006On Grammatical Relations as Constraints on Referent Identification. In T. Tsunoda & T. Kageyam (eds.), Voice and Grammatical Relations: Festschrift for Masayoshi Shibatani (Typological Studies in Language), 139–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. & Dory Poa
2006On Describing Word Order. In F. Ameka, A. Dench & N. Evans (eds.), Catching Language: The Standing Challenge of Grammar Writing, 269–95. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leeson, Lorraine & J. I. Saeed
2012Word Order. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign Language: An International Handbook, 245–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott K.
1980American Sign Language Syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
2000Indicating verbs and pronouns: Pointing away from agreement. In K. Emmorey & H. Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 303–20. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Massone, Maria Ignacia & Monica Curiel
2004Sign order in Argentine Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 5(1). 63–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mathur, Gaurav & Christian Rathmann
2010Verb agreement in sign language morphology. In D. Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 173–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Verb Agreement. In R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 136–57. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKee, Rachel, Adam Schembri, David McKee & Trevor Johnston
2011Variable “subject” expression in Australian Sign Language and New Zealand Sign Language. Language Variation and Change 23(1). 1375–398.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, Mark Aronoff, Carl Börstell, So-One Hwang, Deniz Ilkabasaran, Itamar Kastner, Ryan Lepic, Adi Lifshitz Ben-Basat, Carol A. Padden & Wendy Sandler
2017The effect of being human and the basis of grammatical word order: Insights from novel communication systems and young sign languages. Cognition 158. 189–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, Marie & Louis Desouvrey
1994Word Order in Sentences with Directional Verbs in Quebec Sign Language. In I. Ahlgren, B. Bergman & M. Brennan (eds.), Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, vol. 1, 149–58. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Napoli, D. J. & Rachel Sutton-Spence
2014Order of the major constituents in sign languages: implications for all language. Frontiers in Psychology 5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Neidle, Carol, Judy Anne Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Ben Bahan & Robert Lee
2000The Syntax of American Sign Language: Functional Categories and Hierarchical Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Oomen, Marloes & Roland Pfau
2017Signing NOT (or not): A typological perspective on standard negation in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Linguistic Typology 21(1). 1–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 994 ]
Padden, Carol
1988The Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Parmentier, Richard
1994Sign in Society: Studies in Semiotic Anthropology. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E.
1997Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders
1955Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Petronio, Karen & Diane Lillo-Martin
1997WH-Movement and the Position of Spec-CP: Evidence from American Sign Language. Language 73. 18–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinsonneault, Dominique
1994Verb echoes in LSQ. In M. Brennan & G. Turner (eds.), Word order issues in sign language: Working papers (presented at a workshop held in Durham 18–22 September 1991), 113–31. Durham: ISLA.Google Scholar
Puupponen, Anna
2019Towards understanding nonmanuality: a semiotic treatment of signers’ head movements. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 4(1), 39. 31–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, David & Sarika Mehta
2010Register variation in mimetic gestural complements to signed language. Journal of Pragmatics 42(3). 557–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Quandros, Ronice Muller & Diane Lillo-Martin
2010Clause Structure. In D. Brentari (ed.), Sign Languages, 225–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rankin, Miako
2013Form, Meaning, and Focus in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Schembri, A., K. Cormier & J. Fenlon
2018Indicating verbs as typologically unique constructions: Reconsidering verb ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3(1), 89. 81–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schembri, Adam, Kearsy Cormier, Jordan Fenlon & Trevor Johnston
2018Sociolinguistic Typology and Sign Languages. Frontiers in Psychology 9. 200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taub, Sarah
2001Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Paul J. Hopper
2001Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation. In J. Bybee & P. J. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, 27–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Valli, Clayton, Ceil Lucas & Kirstin J. Mulrooney
2005Linguistics of American Sign Language: A resource text for ASL users. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla
1997Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vermeerbergen, M., Lorraine Leeson & Onno Crasborn
2007Simultaneity in signed languages: form and function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Volterra, Virginia, A. Laudanna, Serena Corazza, E. Radutsky & F. Natale
1984Italian Sign Language: the order of elements in the declarative sentence. In F. Loncke, P. Boyes-Braem & Y. Lebrun (eds.), Recent Research on European Sign Languages, 19–48. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
[ p. 995 ]
Wilbur, Ronnie B.
1994Foregrounding structures in American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics 22. 647–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman & Corrine Occhino
2016Constructing signs: Place as a symbolic structure in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics 27(3). 371–404. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, A. Klassmann & Han Sloetjes
2006ELAN: a Professional Framework for Multimodality Research. Proceedings of LREC 2006, Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 1556–59. Paris: ELAR.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike
2004Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology 8. 1–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2006Sign Language Typology 1: Interrogative and Negative Constructions in Sign Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zima, Elisabeth & Alexander Bergs
2017Multimodality and construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1 (Jun 2017) CrossrefGoogle Scholar