Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 42:4 (2018) ► pp. 798846
Baayen, R. Harald
2008Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bard, Ellen G., Dan Robertson & Antonella Sorace
1996Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72(1). 32–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia
2010Binding properties of impersonal human pronouns in generic and episodic contexts. http://​archive​.sfl​.cnrs​.fr​/sites​/sfl​/IMG​/pdf​/impersMay2010CabredoHofherrManOnLa​.pdf (6 April 2017.)
Cheshire, Jenny
2013Grammaticalisation in social context: The emergence of a new English pronoun. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(5). 608–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coussé, Evie & Johan van der Auwera
2012Human impersonal pronouns in Swedish and Dutch: A contrastive study of man and men . Languages in Contrast 12(2). 121–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Hoop, Helen & Sammie Tarenskeen
2015It’s all about you in Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics 881. 163–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deringer, Lisa, Volker Gast, Florian Haas & Olga Rudolf
2015Impersonal uses of the second person singular and generalized empathy: An exploratory corpus study of English, German and Russian. In Laure Gardelle & Sandrine Sorlin (eds.), The pragmatics of personal pronouns, 311–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Bruce C.
1993A Grammar of Afrikaans. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duinhoven, A. M.
1990Verdwijnt men? [Is men disappearing?] In Hans den Besten, A. M. Duinhoven & Jan P. A. Stroop (eds.), Vragende wijs: Vragen over tekst, taal en taalgeschiedenis [Interrogative mood: Questions about tekst, language and language history], 70–80. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Fonesca-Greber, Bonnie & Linda R. Waugh
2003On the radical difference between the subject personal pronouns in written and spoken European French. In Pepi Leistyna & Charles F. Meyer (eds.), Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use, 225–240. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gast, Volker
2015On the use of translation corpora in contrastive linguistics: A case study of impersonalization in English and German. Languages in Contrast 15(1). 4–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Online database for a typology of human impersonal pronouns. http://​www​.personal​.uni​-jena​.de​/~mu65qev​/improtype (4 July 2017.)
Gast, Volker, Lisa Deringer, Florian Haas & Olga Rudolf
2015Impersonal uses of the second person singular: A pragmatic analysis of generalization and empathy effects. Journal of Pragmatics 881. 148–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gast, Volker & Johan van der Auwera
2013Towards a distributional typology of human impersonal pronouns, based on data from European languages. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in the memory of Anna Siewierska, 119–158. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna & Andrea Sansò
2007The spread and decline of indefinite man-constructions in European languages: An areal perspective. In Paolo Ramat & Elisa Roma (eds.), Europe and the Mediterranean linguistic areas: Convergences from a historical and typological Perspective, 95–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney & Randolph Quirk
1970Elicitation experiments in English: Linguistic studies in use and attitude. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Jarich
2010On the impersonal pronoun men in Modern West Frisian. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 13(1). 31–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hofmeister, Philip, T. Florian Jaeger, Ivan Sag, Inbal Arnon & Neal Snider
2007Locality and accessibility in wh-questions. In Sam Featherston & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base, 185–206. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
IBM Corp.
2013IBM SPSS statistics for Windows: Version 22.0. Armonk: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Kirsten, Johanita
2016Grammatikale verandering in Afrikaans van 1911–2010 [Grammatical change in Afrikaans from 1991–2010]. Vanderbijlpark: North-West University dissertation.Google Scholar
Malamud, Sophia A.
2013(In)definiteness-driven typology of arbitrary items. Lingua 1261. 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Posio, Pekka & Maria Vilkuna
2013Referential dimensions of human impersonals in dialectal European Portuguese and Finnish. Linguistics 51(1). 177–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rasinger, Sebastian M.
2013Quantitative research in linguistics: An introduction. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2004Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Overlap and complementarity in reference impersonals: Man-constructions vs. third person plural-impersonal in the languages of Europe. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 57–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna & Maria Papastathi
2011Towards a typology of third personal plural impersonals. Linguistics 49(3). 575–610. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sprouse, Jon & Diogo Almeida
2012Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger’s Core Syntax . Journal of Linguistics 48(3). 609–652. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan
2011Standard Average European. In Bernd Kortmann & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe: A comprehensive guide, 291–306. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, Volker Gast & Jeroen Vanderbiesen
2012Human impersonal pronoun uses in English, Dutch and German. Leuvense Bijdragen 981. 27–64.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Vladimir A. Plungian
1998Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Olmen, Daniël & Adri Breed
2018Human impersonal pronouns in Afrikaans: A double questionnaire-based study. Language Sciences 691. 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Olmen, Daniël, Adri Breed & Ben Verhoeven
2019A corpus-based study of the human impersonal pronoun (’n) mens in Afrikaans: Compared to men and een mens in Dutch. Languages in Contrast 19(1). 79–105.
Weerman, Fred
2006It’s the economy, stupid: Een vergelijkende blik op men en man [It’s the economy, stupid: A comparative look at men en man ]. In Matthias Hüning, Ulrike Vogl, Ton van der Wouden & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Nederlands tussen Duits en Engels [Dutch between German and English], 19–47. Leiden: Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden.Google Scholar
Zifonun, Gisela
2001 Man lebt nur einmal: Morphosyntax und Semantik des Pronomens man . Deutsche Sprache 28(3). 232–253.Google Scholar
Zobel, Sarah
2016A pragmatic analysis of German impersonally used first person singular ich . Pragmatics 26(3). 379–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Breed, Adri, Jo-Ann Chan & Daniël van Olmen
2021. Developing and validating a visual questionnaire for the study of impersonalisation strategies: A design thinking approach. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39:2  pp. 152 ff. Crossref logo
Breed, Adri & Daniël Van Olmen
2021. The Passive as an Impersonalisation Strategy in Afrikaans and Dutch: A Corpus Investigation. Dutch Crossing 45:2  pp. 171 ff. Crossref logo
Rădulescu, Valentin & Daniël Van Olmen
2022. A questionnaire-based study of impersonalization in Romanian and English. Languages in Contrast 22:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.