Human impersonal pronouns in West Germanic
A questionnaire-based comparative study of Afrikaans, Dutch and English
In this article, we examine and compare the main human impersonal pronouns in Afrikaans, Dutch and English. The
second person singular, the third person plural and the ‘man’- and ‘one’-pronouns are studied by means of an acceptability
judgment questionnaire and a completion questionnaire. The combination of the two methods reveals interesting descriptive facts
about the three West Germanic languages. They include, among other things, the ‘man’-prominence of Afrikaans versus the
‘you’-prominence of Dutch and English for expressing the universal meaning ‘anyone’ and the more prominent position of ‘they’ in
Dutch than in the other languages for conveying the existential meaning ‘someone, some people’. Our findings have a number of more
theoretical implications too. The two existing semantic maps for human impersonal pronouns make different distinctions in the
existential domain, based on type/level of (un)knownness on the one hand and number on the other. Our study tests both sets of
distinctions and shows that the two dimensions interact with each other in Afrikaans, Dutch and English. The results thus support
a recent proposal in the literature for a combined semantic map. The data from the completion questionnaire, finally, also
indicates that existential uses prefer alternative forms of impersonalization to human impersonal pronouns in all three
languages.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Methodology
- 2.1Acceptability judgment questionnaire
- 2.2Completion questionnaire
- 2.3Earlier questionnaires
- 2.4Delivery and participants
- 2.5Statistics
- 3.Universal-internal uses
- 3.1Acceptability judgment task
- 3.2Completion task
- 3.3Interim conclusion
- 4.Non-universal-internal uses
- 4.1Acceptability judgment task
- 4.2Completion task
- 4.3Interim conclusion
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Baayen, R. Harald
2008 Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bard, Ellen G., Dan Robertson & Antonella Sorace
1996 Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability.
Language 72(1). 32–68.
Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia
2010 Binding properties of impersonal human pronouns in generic and episodic contexts.
[URL] (
6 April 2017.)
Cheshire, Jenny
2013 Grammaticalisation in social context: The emergence of a new English pronoun.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(5). 608–633.
Coussé, Evie & Johan van der Auwera
De Hoop, Helen & Sammie Tarenskeen
2015 It’s all about you in Dutch.
Journal of Pragmatics 881. 163–175.
Deringer, Lisa, Volker Gast, Florian Haas & Olga Rudolf
Donaldson, Bruce C.
1993 A Grammar of Afrikaans. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Duinhoven, A. M.
1990 Verdwijnt men? [Is
men disappearing?] In
Hans den Besten,
A. M. Duinhoven &
Jan P. A. Stroop (eds.),
Vragende wijs: Vragen over tekst, taal en taalgeschiedenis [
Interrogative mood: Questions about tekst, language and language history], 70–80. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Fonesca-Greber, Bonnie & Linda R. Waugh
2003 On the radical difference between the subject personal pronouns in written and spoken European French. In
Pepi Leistyna &
Charles F. Meyer (eds.),
Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use, 225–240. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Gast, Volker
2017 Online database for a typology of human impersonal pronouns.
[URL] (
4 July 2017.)
Gast, Volker, Lisa Deringer, Florian Haas & Olga Rudolf
2015 Impersonal uses of the second person singular: A pragmatic analysis of generalization and empathy effects.
Journal of Pragmatics 881. 148–162.
Gast, Volker & Johan van der Auwera
2013 Towards a distributional typology of human impersonal pronouns, based on data from European languages. In
Dik Bakker &
Martin Haspelmath (eds.),
Languages across boundaries: Studies in the memory of Anna Siewierska, 119–158. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Giacalone Ramat, Anna & Andrea Sansò
Greenbaum, Sidney & Randolph Quirk
1970 Elicitation experiments in English: Linguistic studies in use and attitude. London: Longman.
Hoekstra, Jarich
2010 On the impersonal pronoun men in Modern West Frisian.
Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 13(1). 31–59.
Hofmeister, Philip, T. Florian Jaeger, Ivan Sag, Inbal Arnon & Neal Snider
2007 Locality and accessibility in wh-questions. In
Sam Featherston &
Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.),
Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base, 185–206. Berlin: De Gruyter.
IBM Corp.
2013 IBM SPSS statistics for Windows: Version 22.0. Armonk: IBM Corp.
Kirsten, Johanita
2016 Grammatikale verandering in Afrikaans van 1911–2010 [
Grammatical change in Afrikaans from 1991–2010]. Vanderbijlpark: North-West University dissertation.
Malamud, Sophia A.
2013 (In)definiteness-driven typology of arbitrary items.
Lingua 1261. 1–31.
Posio, Pekka & Maria Vilkuna
2013 Referential dimensions of human impersonals in dialectal European Portuguese and Finnish.
Linguistics 51(1). 177–229.
Rasinger, Sebastian M.
2013 Quantitative research in linguistics: An introduction. London: Bloomsbury.
Siewierska, Anna
2004 Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Siewierska, Anna & Maria Papastathi
2011 Towards a typology of third personal plural impersonals.
Linguistics 49(3). 575–610.
Sprouse, Jon & Diogo Almeida
2012 Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger’s Core Syntax
.
Journal of Linguistics 48(3). 609–652.
van der Auwera, Johan
2011 Standard Average European. In
Bernd Kortmann &
Johan van der Auwera (eds.),
The languages and linguistics of Europe: A comprehensive guide, 291–306. Berlin: De Gruyter.
van der Auwera, Johan, Volker Gast & Jeroen Vanderbiesen
2012 Human impersonal pronoun uses in English, Dutch and German.
Leuvense Bijdragen 981. 27–64.
van der Auwera, Johan & Vladimir A. Plungian
1998 Modality’s semantic map.
Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124.
Van Olmen, Daniël & Adri Breed
2018 Human impersonal pronouns in Afrikaans: A double questionnaire-based study.
Language Sciences 691. 1–29.
Van Olmen, Daniël, Adri Breed & Ben Verhoeven
2019 A corpus-based study of the human impersonal pronoun (’n) mens in Afrikaans: Compared to men and een mens in Dutch.
Languages in Contrast 19(1). 79–105.
Weerman, Fred
2006 It’s the economy, stupid: Een vergelijkende blik op men en man
[It’s the economy, stupid: A comparative look at
men en
man
]. In
Matthias Hüning,
Ulrike Vogl,
Ton van der Wouden &
Arie Verhagen (eds.),
Nederlands tussen Duits en Engels [
Dutch between German and English], 19–47. Leiden: Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden.
Zifonun, Gisela
2001
Man lebt nur einmal: Morphosyntax und Semantik des Pronomens man
.
Deutsche Sprache 28(3). 232–253.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Breed, Adri, Jo-Ann Chan & Daniël van Olmen
2021.
Developing and validating a visual questionnaire for the study of impersonalisation strategies: A design thinking approach.
Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39:2
► pp. 152 ff.
Breed, Adri & Daniël Van Olmen
2021.
The Passive as an Impersonalisation Strategy in Afrikaans and Dutch: A Corpus Investigation.
Dutch Crossing 45:2
► pp. 171 ff.
Rădulescu, Valentin & Daniël Van Olmen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.