Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 42:4 (2018) ► pp.798846
References (35)
References
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bard, Ellen G., Dan Robertson & Antonella Sorace. 1996. Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72(1). 32–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia. 2010. Binding properties of impersonal human pronouns in generic and episodic contexts. [URL] (6 April, 2017.)
Cheshire, Jenny. 2013. Grammaticalisation in social context: The emergence of a new English pronoun. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(5). 608–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coussé, Evie & Johan van der Auwera. 2012. Human impersonal pronouns in Swedish and Dutch: A contrastive study of man and men . Languages in Contrast 12(2). 121–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Hoop, Helen & Sammie Tarenskeen. 2015. It’s all about you in Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics 881. 163–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deringer, Lisa, Volker Gast, Florian Haas & Olga Rudolf. 2015. Impersonal uses of the second person singular and generalized empathy: An exploratory corpus study of English, German and Russian. In Laure Gardelle & Sandrine Sorlin (eds.), The pragmatics of personal pronouns, 311–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Bruce C. 1993. A Grammar of Afrikaans. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duinhoven, A. M. 1990. Verdwijnt men? [Is men disappearing?] In Hans den Besten, A. M. Duinhoven & Jan P. A. Stroop (eds.), Vragende wijs: Vragen over tekst, taal en taalgeschiedenis [Interrogative mood: Questions about tekst, language and language history], 70–80. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Fonesca-Greber, Bonnie & Linda R. Waugh. 2003. On the radical difference between the subject personal pronouns in written and spoken European French. In Pepi Leistyna & Charles F. Meyer (eds.), Corpus analysis: Language structure and language use, 225–240. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Online database for a typology of human impersonal pronouns. [URL] (4 July, 2017.)
Gast, Volker, Lisa Deringer, Florian Haas & Olga Rudolf. 2015. Impersonal uses of the second person singular: A pragmatic analysis of generalization and empathy effects. Journal of Pragmatics 881. 148–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gast, Volker & Johan van der Auwera. 2013. Towards a distributional typology of human impersonal pronouns, based on data from European languages. In Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in the memory of Anna Siewierska, 119–158. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna & Andrea Sansò. 2007. The spread and decline of indefinite man-constructions in European languages: An areal perspective. In Paolo Ramat & Elisa Roma (eds.), Europe and the Mediterranean linguistic areas: Convergences from a historical and typological Perspective, 95–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney & Randolph Quirk. 1970. Elicitation experiments in English: Linguistic studies in use and attitude. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Jarich. 2010. On the impersonal pronoun men in Modern West Frisian. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 13(1). 31–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofmeister, Philip, T. Florian Jaeger, Ivan Sag, Inbal Arnon & Neal Snider. 2007. Locality and accessibility in wh-questions. In Sam Featherston & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Roots: Linguistics in search of its evidential base, 185–206. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
IBM Corp. 2013. IBM SPSS statistics for Windows: Version 22.0. Armonk: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Kirsten, Johanita. 2016. Grammatikale verandering in Afrikaans van 1911–2010 [Grammatical change in Afrikaans from 1991–2010]. Vanderbijlpark: North-West University dissertation.Google Scholar
Malamud, Sophia A. 2013. (In)definiteness-driven typology of arbitrary items. Lingua 1261. 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posio, Pekka & Maria Vilkuna. 2013. Referential dimensions of human impersonals in dialectal European Portuguese and Finnish. Linguistics 51(1). 177–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rasinger, Sebastian M. 2013. Quantitative research in linguistics: An introduction. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Overlap and complementarity in reference impersonals: Man-constructions vs. third person plural-impersonal in the languages of Europe. In Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds.), Impersonal constructions: A cross-linguistic perspective, 57–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna & Maria Papastathi. 2011. Towards a typology of third personal plural impersonals. Linguistics 49(3). 575–610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sprouse, Jon & Diogo Almeida. 2012. Assessing the reliability of textbook data in syntax: Adger’s Core Syntax . Journal of Linguistics 48(3). 609–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan. 2011. Standard Average European. In Bernd Kortmann & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe: A comprehensive guide, 291–306. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, Volker Gast & Jeroen Vanderbiesen. 2012. Human impersonal pronoun uses in English, Dutch and German. Leuvense Bijdragen 981. 27–64.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Olmen, Daniël & Adri Breed. 2018. Human impersonal pronouns in Afrikaans: A double questionnaire-based study. Language Sciences 691. 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Olmen, Daniël, Adri Breed & Ben Verhoeven. 2019. A corpus-based study of the human impersonal pronoun (’n) mens in Afrikaans: Compared to men and een mens in Dutch. Languages in Contrast 19(1). 79–105.
Weerman, Fred. 2006. It’s the economy, stupid: Een vergelijkende blik op men en man [It’s the economy, stupid: A comparative look at men en man ]. In Matthias Hüning, Ulrike Vogl, Ton van der Wouden & Arie Verhagen (eds.), Nederlands tussen Duits en Engels [Dutch between German and English], 19–47. Leiden: Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden.Google Scholar
Zifonun, Gisela. 2001. Man lebt nur einmal: Morphosyntax und Semantik des Pronomens man . Deutsche Sprache 28(3). 232–253.Google Scholar
Zobel, Sarah. 2016. A pragmatic analysis of German impersonally used first person singular ich . Pragmatics 26(3). 379–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Fastrich, Bridgit
2024. Construal and impersonalization in German and English: Comparing impersonal pronouns in online hotel reviews. Lingua 308  pp. 103773 ff. DOI logo
Rădulescu, Valentin & Daniël Van Olmen
2022. A questionnaire-based study of impersonalization in Romanian and English. Languages in Contrast 22:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Breed, Adri, Jo-Ann Chan & Daniël van Olmen
2021. Developing and validating a visual questionnaire for the study of impersonalisation strategies: A design thinking approach. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39:2  pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Breed, Adri & Daniël Van Olmen
2021. The Passive as an Impersonalisation Strategy in Afrikaans and Dutch: A Corpus Investigation. Dutch Crossing 45:2  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.