Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 43:3 (2019) ► pp.628–667

Expressing possibility in two Oceanic languages

ORCID logo | Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
| Monash University
In this paper, we offer the first detailed description of expressions of possibility in the Oceanic languages Daakaka and Saliba-Logea. We show that in these languages basic expressions of possibility are bi-clausal. This suggests that, depending on their intended scope, typological studies of modal expressions may need to consider grammaticalized bi-clausal structures which have typically been excluded in studies of this domain based on their structural complexity. Relevant features to consider bi-clausal constructions as basic, grammaticalized expressions of possibility include their frequency, semantic specificity, and paradigmatic relationship with other modal expressions. The findings presented here are based on the analysis of original corpus data and targeted fieldwork.
Keywords: modality, possibility, grammaticalization, Oceanic
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1The typology of modal expressions
    • 2.2Typology of embedded structures
    • 2.3Modal expressions in Oceanic
    • 2.4Methodology
  • 3.Expressing possibility in Daakaka
    • 3.1Overview
    • 3.2 Kuowilye, ‘know’
    • 3.3 Wese, ‘enough, suffice’
    • 3.4Conclusions
  • 4.Expressing possibility in Saliba-Logea
    • 4.1Overview
    • 4.2 Gonowa-
    • 4.3Conclusions
  • 5.Summary
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 18 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18051.pri
References (60)
References
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1992. Japanese modals are conditionals. In Diane Brentari, Gary N. Larson & Lynn A. MacLeod (eds.), The joy of grammar: A festschrift in honor of James D. Mccawley, 1–10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbour, Julie. 2011. Exploring mood in Neverver. Oceanic Linguistics 50(1). 198–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bogal-Allbritten, Elizabeth A. 2016. Building meaning in Navajo. Boston: University of Massachusetts Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Bugenhagen, Robert D. 1993. The semantics of irrealis in the Austronesian languages of Papua New Guinea. In Ger P. Reesink (ed.), Topics in descriptive Austronesian linguistics, 1–39. Leiden: Rijksuniversiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
Burton, Strang & Lisa Matthewson. 2015. Targeted construction storyboards in semantic fieldwork. In Ryan Bochnak, & Lisa Matthewson (eds.), Methodologies in semantic fieldwork, 135–156. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L., Revere Perkins & W. Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2003. 19 mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 6021. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. 1998. “Irrealis” as a grammatical category. Anthropological Linguistics 40(2). 257–271.Google Scholar
Cleary-Kemp, Jessica. 2014. Irrealis as verbal non-specificity in Koro (Oceanic). Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February. 20–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, Peter. 1982. Imbabura Quechua (Lingua Descriptive Studies, no. 5). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonja. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert Malcolm Ward. 1988. A grammar of Boumaa Fijian. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Tamsin. 1980. Ngiyambaa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Druskat, Stephan. 2018 (Jan.). ToolboxTextModules (Version 1.1.0).Google Scholar
Durie, Mark. 1985. A grammar of Acehnese. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas D. 2003. Typologies of agreement: Some problems from Kayardild. Transactions of the Philological Society 101. 203–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1980. The binding hierarchy and the typology of complements. Studies in Language 41. 333–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givon, Talmy. 1994. Irrealis and the subjunctive. Studies in Language 181. 265–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine. 2009. On the interaction of aspect and modal auxiliaries. Linguistics and Philosophy 321. 279–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, K. 2004. Illocution, mood and modality. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann & J. Mugdan (eds.), Morphology: A handbook on inflection and word-formation, 1190–1201. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 2003. Grammaticalization (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics), 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, A. H. 1986. Semi-clausal modals in Korean verb morphology. Linguistics Colloquium talk, University of Oregon, Eugene.Google Scholar
Krause, Thomas & Amir Zeldes. 2016. ANNIS3: A new architecture for generic corpus query and visualization. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 31(1). 118–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 2008. A grammar of Toqabaqita (Mouton Grammar Library), vol. 421. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Modality and mood in Oceanic. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Mood and Modality, 330–361. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Margetts, Anna. 1999. Valence and transitivity in Saliba, an Oceanic language of Papua New Guinea (Series in Psycholinguistics), vol. 121. Nijmegen: MPI for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Margetts, Anna, Andrew Margetts & Carmen Dawuda. 2017. Saliba/Logea. The Language Archive. [URL]
Matisoff, James A. 1986. Hearts and minds in South-East Asian languages and English: an essay in the comparative lexical semantics of psycho-collocation. Cahiers de Linguistique d’Asie orientale 15(1). 5–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Anthony & Richard Xiao. 2004. The Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese. [URL]
Mosel, Ulrike. 1994. Saliba (Languages of the World/Materials), vol. 311. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Jill. 2007. A grammar of Neve’ei, Vanuatu. Canberra: Australian National University, Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 2016. The expression of non-epistemic modal categories. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Mood and Modality, 89–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nauze, Fabrice. 2008. Modality in typological perspective. Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Communication.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol.21, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Bill. 2007. Imperfective aspect and the interplay of aspect, tense, and modality in Torau. Oceanic Linguistics 46(2). 499–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R. 2001. Mood and modality, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Prince, Kilu. 2013. Daakaka, the language archive. Nijmegen: MPI for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
. 2015. A grammar of Daakaka. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2017. Dozing eyes and drunken faces: Nominalized psych-collocations in Daakaka. Studies in Language. 502–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018a. Fat pig (MelaTAMP storyboards). Zenodo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018b. Festival (MelaTAMP storyboards). Zenodo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018c. Red yam (MelaTAMP storyboards). Zenodo. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Bananas. (MelaTAMP storyboards). Zenodo. DOI logo
. 2017. Daakaka dictionary. Dictionaria. [URL], 1–2171.
von Prince, Kilu, Ana Krajinović, Manred Krifka, Valérie Guérin & Michael Franjieh. 2018. Mapping irreality: Storyboards for eliciting tam contexts. In Anja Gattnar, Robin Hörnig & Melanie Störzer (eds.), Proceedings of linguistic evidence 2018.Google Scholar
Rolka, Matthew & Seth Cable. 2010. Tom and Mittens. Totem Field Storyboards. Retrieved from [URL] (Accessed 21 Sep 2017).
Schaaik, Gerjan van. 1985. Verb based terms and modality in Turkish. Unpublished paper, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten. 2014. Complement clauses and complementation systems: A cross-linguistic study of grammatical organization. Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara. 2007. Towards a typology of complement control. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 471. 1–80.Google Scholar
Sulkala, Helena & Merja Karjalainen. 1992. Finnish. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
TFS Working Group. 2010. The fortune teller. Totem Field Storyboards. Retrieved from [URL] (Accessed 21 Sep 2017).
. 2011a. Chore girl. Totem Field Storyboards. Retrieved from [URL] (Accessed 21 Sep 2017).
. 2011b. The woodchopper. Totem Field Storyboards. Illustrated by Katie Sardinha. Retrieved from [URL] (Accessed 21 Sep 2017).
Vander Klok, Jozina. 2013. Bill vs. the weather. Totem field storyboards. Retrieved from [URL] (Accessed 31 May 2018).
Wolf, Lavi. 2014. Degrees of assertion. Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Faculty of Humanities and Social.Google Scholar
Zipser, Florian & Laurent Romary. 2010. A model oriented approach to the mapping of annotation formats using standards. Proceedings of the Workshop on Language Resource and Language Technology Standards.Google Scholar