Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 43:3 (2019) ► pp. 499532

[ p. 529 ]References

Abraham, Werner
2002Modal verbs: epistemics in German and English. In Sjef Barbiers, Frits Beukema & Wim van der Wurff (eds.), Modality and its interaction with the verbal system, 19–50. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Attal, Pierre
1994Questions de sémantique: une approche comportementaliste du langage. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Bittner, Thomas & Barry Smith
2001A unified theory of granularity, vagueness and approximation. Proceedings of the first COSIT workshop on spatial vagueness, uncertainty, and granularity. Ogunquit, ME, CD-ROM, 1–39.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1989Extrinsic possibility and intrinsic potentiality: 7 on May and Can +1. Journal of Pragmatics 13. 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro & Sally McConnell-Ginet
1990Meaning and grammar. An introduction to semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer
1983The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Cruse, Alan
2011Meaning in language: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1991The evolution of negation. Journal of Linguistics 27. 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Haan, Ferdinand
2015The interaction of modality and negation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse & Susan Reed
2011Towards a more explicit taxonomy of root possibility in English. English Language and Linguistics 15. 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse
2014Modal meaning and lexically-regulated saturation. Journal of Pragmatics 71. 160–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drubig, Hans
2001On the syntactic form of epistemic modality. University of Tübingen ms. [accessed online at http://​www​.lingexp​.uni​-tuebingen​.de​/sfb441​/b2​/papers​/DrubigModality​.pdf on May 14, 2018]
Duffley, Patrick J., Sandra Clarke & Walter Hirtle
1982MAY, CAN and the expression of permission. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 26. 179–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duffley, Patrick J.
1992The English infinitive. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1994 Need and dare: the black sheep of the modal family. Lingua 94. 213–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Negation and the lexical semantics of the modal auxiliaries must and may in English. In Pierre Larrivée (ed.), La structuration conceptuelle du langage, 69–82. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Duffley, Patrick J. & Pierre Larrivée
1998 Need, dare and negative polarity. Linguistic Analysis 28. 1–19.Google Scholar
Duffley, Patrick J.
1998Considerations for the cognitive analysis of the modal auxiliaries in English. Langues et linguistique 24. 85–103.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, De Smet, Hendrik & Wim van der Wurff
2017A brief history of English syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flannery, Tom
2005The weathermakers. Toronto: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A.
1998Concepts. Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 530 ]
Frawley, William
1992Linguistic semantics. Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Catherine
1982La paraphrase. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
1994Paraphrase et Énonciation. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Galsworthy, John
1920Tatterdemalion. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Grize, Jean-Blaise & Benjamin Matalon
1962Introduction à une étude expérimentale et formelle du raisonnement naturel. In Evert Willem Beth, Jean-Blaise Grize, Roger Martin, Wolfe Mays, Arne Naess & Jean Piaget (eds.), Implication, formalisation et logique naturelle (Études d’épistémologie génétique 16), 9–67. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Hacquard, Valentine
2011Modality. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, 1484–515. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1994 [1985]An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner
1958Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack
2012On the natural history of negative polarity items. Linguistic Analysis 38. 3–33.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Ronald T.
1966Past tense replacement and the modal system. In Anthony G. Oettinger (ed.), Mathematical linguistics and automatic translation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Harvard Computational Laboratory. Report NSF-17.Google Scholar
Hirtle, Walter
1997DO auxiliary – a meaningful support and operator. Lingua 100. 111–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
1989A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2017The singular square: contrariety and double negation from Aristotle to Homer. In Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Grisot, Stephanie Durrleman & Christopher Laenzlinger (eds.), Formal models in the study of language. Applications in interdisciplinary contexts, 143–79. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney
1976Some theoretical issues in the description of the English verb. Lingua 40. 331–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Richard
1975The meaning of questions. Language 51. 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Michael
2011The grammar of polarity. Pragmatics, sensitivity, and the logic of scales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsson, Bengt
1979Modality and the modals of necessity must and have to . English Studies 60. 296–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
James, Francis
1986Semantics of the English subjunctive. Vancouver: University of British Colombia Press.Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S.
1964Negation in English. In Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold Katz (eds.), The structure of language, 246–323. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1978The form and meaning of the English auxiliary. Language 54. 853–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 531 ]
2000Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2009Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015How to build an English clause. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics 5. 1–45.Google Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre
2004L’association négative. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N.
2004Meaning and the English verb, 3rd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maché, Jakob
2013On black magic – How epistemic modifiers emerge. Berlin: Freie Universität zu Berlin Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner
(eds.) 2011Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M. Lynne
2010Lexical meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, Rachel & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
1997Scope and the development of epistemic modality: evidence from ought to . English Language and Linguistics 1. 295–317. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R.
1986Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.
1990Modality and the English modals, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2001Mood and modality. Cambridge: University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann
2002Deutsches Wörterbuch: Bedeutungsgeschichte und Aufbau unseres Wortschatzes, 10th edn. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey N. Leech, & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schlegoff, Emanuel A.
2000On granularity. Annual Review of Sociology 26. 715–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1988Force Dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12. 49–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel
1985The negation of epistemic necessity in present-day British and American English. English World Wide 6. 87–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1972A history of English syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan
2001On the typology of negative modals. In Jack Hoeksema, Hotze Rullmann, Victor Sanchez-Valencia & Ton van der Wouden (eds.), Perspectives on negation and polarity items, 23–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Veselinova, Ljuba N.
2016The negative existential cycle viewed through the lens of comparative data. In Elly van Gelderen (ed.), Cyclical Change Continued, 139–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 532 ]
von Bergen, Anke, & Klaus von Bergen
1993Negative Polarität im Englischen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum
1983Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t . Language 59. 502–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar