Book review
Christiane Laeufer & Terrell A. Morgan. Theoretical analyses in Romance linguistics.
References (19)
References
Aoun, Joseph. 1985. A Grammar of Anaphora. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borer, Hagit. 1989. “Anaphoric AGR”. The Null Subject Parameter ed. by Osvaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir. 68–111. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charette, Monik. 1988. Some Constraints on Governing Relations in Phonology. Ph.D. Dissertation: Montréal: McGill University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria & Edwin Williams. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enç, Murvet. 1987. “Anchoring Conditions for Tense. Linguistic Inquiry 181.633–658.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hooper, Joan B. 1974. “Rule Morphologization in Natural Generative Phonology”. Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology. Chicago Linguistic Society, 160–170.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hornstein, Norbert. 1981. “The Study of Meaning in Natural Language: Three Approaches to Tense”. Explanations in Linguistics ed. by Norbert Hornstein & David Lightfoot. 116–151. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ito, Junto. 1986. “A Prosodie Theory of Epenthesis”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 7, 2:217–259. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1985. “The Internal Structure of Phonological Elements: A Theory of Government & Charm”. Phonology Yearbook 21: 305–328. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger Vergnaud. 1990. “Constituent Structure & Government in Phonology”. Phonology 7, 2: 193–231. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, Richard. 1984. Connectedness & Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kenstowicz, Michael & CHarles Kisseberth. 1979. Generative Phonology. Orlado: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieber, Rochelle. 1983. “Argument Linking & Compounds in English”. Linguistic Inquiry 141. 251–285.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Safir, Kenneth. 1986. “Relative Clauses in a Theory of Binding & Levels”. Linguistic Inquiry 171. 663–689.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1984. Phonology & Syntax: the Relation between Sound & Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skousen, Royal. 1975. Substantive Evidence in Phonology: the Evidence from Finnish & French. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trommelen, Mieke & Wim Zonneveld. 1986. “Dutch Morphology: Evidence from the Right-Hand Hed Rule”. Linguistic Inquiry 171. 147–169.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Edwin. 1981. “On the Notions ‘Lexical Related’ & ‘Head of a Word’”. Linguistic Inquiry 121. 245–274.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)