Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 44:2 (2020) ► pp.407460
Abbott, Barbara
1993A pragmatic account of the definiteness effect in existential sentences. Journal of Pragmatics 191: 39–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Definiteness and existentials. Language 731: 103–108. DOI logo (Last access: 13 February 2020)Google Scholar
2004Definiteness and indefiniteness. In Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, 122–149. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006Definite and indefinite. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., vol.31), 392–399. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aldridge, Edith
2004Ergativity and word order in Austronesian languages. Cornell University Ph.D Dissertation.Google Scholar
Bauer, Winifred
1983, 1997 (2nd edition). Reference grammar of Maori. Auckland: Reed Publ.Google Scholar
Beaver, David, Itamar Francez & Dmitry Levinson
2005Bad subject: (Non)canonicality and NP distribution in existentials. In Efthymia Georgala & Jonathan Howell (eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) XV1, 19–43. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Bender, Byron W.
1969Spoken Marshallese. Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Benton, Richard A.
1968Numeral and attributive classifiers in Trukese. Oceanic Linguistics 7(2), 104–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bril, Isabelle
2000Dictionnaire nêlêmwa-nixumwak-français-anglais. Collection Langues et Cultures du Pacifique, n° 14, Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
2002Le nêlêmwa (Nouvelle-Calédonie): Analyse syntaxique et sémantique. Collection Langues et Cultures du Pacifique, n° 16, Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar
2017Roots and stems: lexical and functional flexibility in Amis and Nêlêmwa. In Eva van Lier (ed.), Studies in Language. Special issue on lexical flexibility in Oceanic languages 41(2), 358–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Gregory
1977A unified analysis of the English bare plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 11, 413–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra
2008Possessors and definiteness effects. Two Austronesian languages. In: Lisa Matthewson (ed.), Quantification: A cross-linguistic perspective. North-Holland Linguistic Series: Linguistic variation, vol. 641, 179–224. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra & William L. Ladusaw
2004 [2001]Restriction and Saturation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2014Existential predication in typological perspective. Unpublished manuscript. Available at: [URL] (Last access: 13 February 2020)
De Hoop, Helen
2012Type-shifting. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics, Vol. 31, 2259–2271. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen & Claire Beyssade
2012Redefining indefinites. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 85. New York, London: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2013Indefinite articles. In: Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at: [URL] (Last access: 13 February 2020)
2014Competing methods for uncovering linguistic diversity: The case of definite and indefinite articles (Commentary on Davis, Gillon, and Matthewson). Language 90(4), 232–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
1987The Discourse Basis of Ergativity. Language 631, 805–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enç, Mürvet
1991The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob
1892Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, Neue Folge, Band 100/1, Jg. 1892, S. 25–50. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1978Definiteness and referentiality. In Joseph Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson, Edith Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 41, 291–330. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2001Syntax. (21 volumes). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Guérin, Valérie
2007Definiteness and specificity in Mavea. Oceanic Linguistics 46(20), 538–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011A grammar of Mavea. An Oceanic language of Vanuatu. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski
1993Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2), 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1997Indefinite pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1978Definiteness and indefiniteness: A study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene and Angelika Kratzer
1998Semantics in Generative Grammar. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heusinger, Klaus von
2002Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics 19(3), 245–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Cross-linguistic implementations of specificity. In: Katarzyna M. Jaszczolt & Ken Turner (eds.). Meaning through language contrast. vol 21, 405–421. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heuvel, Wilco van den
2006Biak: Description of an Austronesian language of Papua. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas
2017The partitive A: On uses of the Finnish partitive subject in transitive clauses. In Ilja A. Seržant & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich (eds.), Diachrony of differential argument marking, 423–453. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Pei Te Hurinui and Bruce Biggs
1995Nga iwi o Tainui: The traditional history of the Tainui people. Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
Kamali, Beste
2015Caseless direct objects in Turkish revisited. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 581, 107–123.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Fred
1999Finnish: An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel
2009Austronesian Nominalism and its consequences: A Tagalog case study. Theoretical Linguistics 35 (1), 1–49. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward & Comrie, Bernard
1977Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1), 63–99.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward
1976Towards a universal definition of subject. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 303–333. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1987A semantic definition of indefinite NP. In Eric J. Reuland, Alice Ter Meulen (eds.). The representation of (in)definiteness, 286–317. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2003The definiteness effect: Semantics or pragmatics ? Natural Language Semantics 11(2), 187–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
2001Structural case in Finnish. Lingua 1111, 315–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Absolutely a matter of degree: The semantics of structural case in Finnish. Paper presented at Chicago Linguistic Society, April 2005. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Krifka, Manfred
2004Bare NPs: Kind-referring, indefinites, both, or neither? In Robert B. Young & Yuping Zhou (eds.) Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) XIII, 180–203. Cornell: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1972Categorical and thetic judgments: Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language 91, 153–185.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1987On the status of canonical SVO sentences in French discourse. In Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse: Outcome of a symposium, Eugene, Oregon, June 1984, 217–261. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1976Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–489. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Latrouite, Anja & Robert D. van Valin
2014Event existential in Tagalog; A role and reference grammar account. In I Wayan Arka & Lina Indrawati (eds.), Argument realisations and related constructions in Austronesian languages, 161–174. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1983A Grammar of Manam. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 18. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher
1999Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margetts, Anna
1999Valence and transitivity in Saliba, an Oceanic language of Papua New Guinea. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2008Transitivity discord in some Oceanic languages. Oceanic Linguistics 47(1), 30–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNally, Louise
2011Existential sentences. Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 21, 1829–1848. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary
1974Existential sentences in English, Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
1977Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 31, 1–29.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1984The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 601, 847–894. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994The implications of ergativity for a Philippine voice system. In: Barbara Fox & Paul Hopper (eds.), Voice: Its form and function (Typological Studies in language 27), 247–277. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ngata, A. T.
1926Complete manual of Maori grammar and conversation with vocabulary, 2d ed. Auckland: Whitcombe and Tombs.Google Scholar
Ngata, H. M.
1994English-Maori dictionary. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
Orbell, Margaret
transl. 1992Traditional Māori stories. Auckland: Reed.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Lawrence Reid
1980The evolution of transitive constructions in Austronesian. In Paz B. Naylor (ed.), Austronesian studies: Papers from the Second Eastern Conference on Austronesian Languages, 103–30. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Center for South and Southeastern Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Masha
1991Maori ‘he’. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Hawaii, Honolulu.
Polinsky, Maria
1992Maori ‘he’ revisited. Oceanic Linguistics, 31(2), 229–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen
1981Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–254. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rehg, Kenneth L.
1981Ponapean reference grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand A.
1905On Denoting. Mind. New Series, Vol. 14, No. 56, 479–493. Oxford: Oxford University Press on behalf of the Mind Association.Google Scholar
Sabbagh, Joseph
2009Existential sentences in Tagalog. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27(4), 675–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1987The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 251, 511–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul & Fé T. Otanes
1972Tagalog reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F.
1950On Referring. Mind, New Series, Vol. 59, No. 235, 320–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugita, Hiroshi
1973Semitransitive verbs and object incorporation in Micronesian languages. Oceanic Linguistics 12(1/2), 393–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waititi, Hoani R.
1974Te rangatahi, advanced 2: A Māori language course. Wellington: GP Publications.Google Scholar
Willson, Heather
2008Subject positions in Marshallese. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Woodbury, Hanni
1977Onondaga noun incorporation: Some notes on the interdependence of syntax and semantics. International Journal of American Linguistics 41(1), 10–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wouk, Fay
1986Transitivity in Proto–Malayo-Polynesian and Proto-Austronesian. In Paul Geraghty, Lois Carrington & Stephen A. Wurm (eds.), FOCAL I: Papers form the Fourth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 133–58. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar