References

References

Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir & Wendy Sandler
2005The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81(2). 301–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auwera, Johan van der & Vladimir A. Plungian
1998Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124.Google Scholar
Bavelas, Janet B., Nicole Chovil, Douglas A. Lawrie & Allan Wade
1992Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes 15(4). 469–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, Janet B., Nicole Chovil, Linda Coates & Loti Roe
1995Gestures specialized for dialogue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21(4). 394–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, Britta & Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen
2010Transmission of sign languages in the Nordic countries. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 74–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
2007Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31(3). 569–606. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1). 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boye, Kasper
2012Epistemic meaning: A crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyes Braem, Penny
2001Functions of the mouthing component in the signing of deaf early and late learners of Swiss German Sign Language. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Foreign vocabulary in sign languages, 1–47. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane, Alessio Di Renzo, Jonathan Keane & Virginia Volterra
2015Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic sources of a handshape distinction expressing agentivity. Topics in Cognitive Science 7(2–3). 95–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bross, Fabian & Daniel Hole
2017Scope-taking strategies and the order of clausal categories in German Sign Language. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 2(1). 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cabeza-Pereiro, Carmen & Silvia Iglesias-Lago
2015Spanish Sign Language. In Julie B. Jepsen, Goedele De Clerck, Sam Lutalo-Kiingi & William B. McGregor (eds.), Sign languages of the world: A comparative handbook, 729–769. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cabeza-Pereiro, Carmen
2013Modality and linguistic change in Spanish Sign Language (LSE). CogniTextes 10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1976Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 25–55. New York, NY: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Conlin, Frances, Paul Hagstrom & Carol Neidle
2003A particle of indefiniteness in American Sign Language. Linguistic Discovery 2(1). 1–21.Google Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, David Quinto-Pozos, Zed Sevcikova & Adam Schembri
2012Lexicalisation and de-lexicalisation in sign languages: Comparing depicting constructions and viewpoint gestures. Language & Communication 32. 329–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno
2015Transcription and notation methods. In Eleni Orfanidou, Bencie Woll & Gary Morgan (eds.), Research methods in sign language studies: A practical guide, 75–88. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dachkovsky, Svetlana & Wendy Sandler
2009Visual intonation in the prosody of a sign language. Language and Speech 52(2–3). 287–314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Debras, Camille
2017The shrug: Forms and meanings of a compound enactment. Gesture 16(1). 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delaporte, Yves
2007Dictionnaire étymologique et historique de la langue des signes française: Origine et évolution de 1200 signes. Les Essarts-le-Roi: Éditions du Fox.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
1990Pragmatics of nonmanual behaviour in Danish Sign Language. In William H. Edmondson & Fred Karlsson (eds.), SLR ‘87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, 121–128. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
1993Space in Danish Sign Language: The semantics and morphosyntax of the use of space in a visual language. Hamburg: Signum Press.Google Scholar
1994Some simultaneous constructions in Danish Sign Language. In Mary Brennan & Graham H. Turner (eds.), Word-order issues in sign language: Working papers presented at a workshop held in Durham, 18–22 September 1991, 73–87. Durham: The International Sign Linguistics Association, The Deaf Studies Research Unit, University of Durham.Google Scholar
1995Point of view expressed through shifters. In Karen Emmorey & Judy Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 133–154. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2002aGestures in signing: The presentation gesture in Danish Sign Language. In Rolf Schulmeister & Heimo Reinitzer (eds.), Progress in Sign Language Research: In Honor of Siegmund Prillwitz/Fortschritte in der Gebärdensprachforschung: Festschrift für Siegmund Prillwitz, vol. 40/Band 40, 143–162. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
2002bGrammatical relations in Danish Sign Language: Topic and subject. In Anneli Pajunen (ed.), Mimesis, sign, and the evolution of language, vol. 3, 5–40. Turku: Turun yliopisto/University of Turku.Google Scholar
2015Perspective in signed discourse: The privileged status of the signer’s locus and gaze. Open Linguistics, 1. 411–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira Brito, Lucinda
1990Epistemic, alethic, and deontic modalities in a Brazilian sign language. In Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, vol. 1: Linguistics, 229–260. Chicago, ILL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan & Qunhu Gong
2010Variation in East Asian sign language structures. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 499–518. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Susan & Wynne Janis
1990Verb sandwiches in American Sign Language. In Siegmund Prillwitz & Tomas Vollhaber (eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on sign language research, 75–85. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan D.
1996The role of agreement and auxiliaries in sign language. Lingua 98. 103–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Susan
2003The cross-linguistic study of sign languages. TCT Education of Disabilities 2(1). 1–17.Google Scholar
Gabarró-López, Silvia
2017Discourse markers in French Belgian Sign Language (LSFB) and Catalan Sign Language (LSC): BUOYS, PALM-UP and SAME: Variation, functions and position in discourse. Namur: University of Namur dissertation.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan
2013Homesign: When gesture is called upon to be language. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silvia Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Teßendorf (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, vol. 1, 113–125. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hansen, Erik & Lars Heltoft
2011Grammatik over det danske sprog I–III [Grammar of the Danish language]. Copenhagen: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tanya Kuteva
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, Trine, Anna Lindström & Jakob Steensig
2011Addressing epistemic incongruence in question–answer sequences through the use of epistemic adverbs. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 107–130. Cambridge, ILL: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herrero-Blanco, Ángel & Ventura Salazar-García
2010The expression of modality in Spanish Sign Language. In Gerry Wanders & Evelien Keizer (eds.), The London Papers II, 19–42 (WEB Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar 83). Available at: http://​home​.hum​.uva​.nl​/fdg​/working​_papers​/WP​-FDG​-83​_Herrero​&Salazar​.pdf last access 5 July 2020.
Herrmann, Annika
2013Modal and focus particles in sign languages: A cross-linguistic study. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hsin, Ai-li. C.
2016An analysis of Chinese tag questions with a cross-linguistic comparison to English tags. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 14(1). 67–118.Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry & Barbara Shaffer
2002Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. In Richard P. Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 199–223. West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Trevor, Donovan Cresdee, Adam Schembri & Bencie Woll
2015FINISH variation and grammaticalization in a signed language: How far down this well-trodden pathway is Auslan (Australian Sign Language)? Language Variation and Change 27. 117–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2010Pragmatic functions of parenthetical I think . In Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch, & Stefan Schneider (eds.), New approaches to hedging, 237–265. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
1988How gestures can become like words. In Fernando Poyatos (ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication, 131–141. Toronto: C. J. Hogrefe.Google Scholar
1995Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 23(3). 247–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lackner, Andrea
2017Functions of head and body movements in Austrian Sign Language. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Harlan
1984When the mind hears: A history of the deaf. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. II: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2013Modals: Striving for control. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge A. Hita, & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality, 3–55. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsui, Tomoko, Taeko Yamamoto & Peter McCagg
2006On the role of language in children’s early understanding of others as epistemic beings. Cognitive Development 21. 158–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matsuoka, Kazumi, Uiko Yano, Hitomi Akahori & Norie Oka
2016Notes on modals and negation in Japanese Sign Language. Studies in Language Sciences: Journal of the Japanese Society for Language Sciences 15. 1–20.Google Scholar
McKee, Rachel L. & Sophia Wallingford
2011‘So, well, whatever’: Discourse functions of palm-up in New Zealand Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 14(2). 213–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Richard P.
2012Language and modality. In Roland Pfau, Marcus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 574–601. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit, Carol Padden, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler
2013Competing iconicities in the structure of languages. Cognitive Linguistics 24(2). 309–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merriam-Webster.com
2020 Available at: https://​www​.merriam​-webster​.com, last access 5 July 2020.
Mesch, Johanna
2016Manual backchannel responses in signers’ conversations in Swedish Sign Language. Language & Communication 50. 22–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, Melanie
1995Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In Ceil Lucas (ed.), Sociolinguistics in deaf communities, 255–268. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
2012Tags: Cross-linguistic diversity and commonality. Journal of Pragmatics 44. 2165–2182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Cornelia
2004Forms and uses of the palm up open hand: a case of a gesture family? In Cornelia Müller & Roland Posner (eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gesture: Proceedings of the Berlin conference, April 1998, 233–256. Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag.Google Scholar
Ordbog over Dansk Tegnsprog
[Dictionary of Danish Sign Language] 2019 Available at: http://​tegnsprog​.dk, last access 5 July 2020.
Ordbog over det danske sprog
[Dictionary of the Danish language] 2020 Available at: https://​ordnet​.dk​/ods, last access 5 July 2020.
Padden, Carol, So-One Hwang, Ryan Lepic & Sharon Seegers
2015Tools for language: Patterned iconicity in sign language nouns and verbs. Topics in Cognitive Science 7(2–3). 81–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padden, Carol
1988Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York, NY: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
2007On the syntax of negation and modals in Catalan Sign Language and German Sign Language. In Pamela M. Perniss, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure, 129–161. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2011Grammaticalization in sign languages. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 683–695. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland
2012Manual communication systems: Evolution and variation. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 513–551. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy
2003On the complementarity of signed and spoken languages. In Yonata Levy & Jeanette C. Schaeffer (eds.), Language competence across populations: Toward a definition of specific language impairment, 383–410. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2010The uniformity and diversity of language: Evidence from sign language. Lingua 120. 2727–2732. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Visual prosody. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 55–76. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2013Vive la différence: Sign language and spoken language in language evolution. Language and Cognition 5(2–3). 189–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapountzaki, Galini G.
2005Free functional elements of tense, aspect, modality and agreement as possible auxiliaries in Greek Sign Language. Bristol: University of Bristol PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam
2003Rethinking ‘classifiers’ in signed languages. In Karen Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Barbara & Terry Janzen
2016Modality and mood in American Sign Language. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 448–470. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Barbara
2002CAN’T: The negation of modal notions in ASL. Sign Language Studies 3(1). 34–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Information ordering and speaker subjectivity: Modality in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2). 175–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siyavoshi, Sara
2019Hands and faces: The expression of modality in ZEI, Iranian Sign Language. Cognitive Linguistics 30(4). 655–686. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I.
2013Typology and channel of communication: Where do signed languages fit in? In Balthasar Bickel, Lenore A. Grenoble, David A. Peterson & Alan Timberlake (eds.), Language typology and historical contingency: In honor of Johanna Nichols, 47–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spread the Sign
2018 Available at: https://​www​.spreadthesign​.com​/en​.us​/search/, last access 5 July 2020.
Sweetser, Eve
1990From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A.
2002“Object complements” and conversation. Studies in Language 26(1). 125–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torigoe, Takashi
1994Resumptive X structure in Japanese Sign Language. In Inger Ahlgren, Brita Bergman & Mary Brennan (eds.), Perspectives on sign language structure, 187–198. Durham: The International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Vermeerbergen, Myriam, & Eline Demey
2007Sign + gesture = speech + gesture? In Myriam Vermeerbergen, Lorraine Leeson, & Onno Crasborn (eds.), Simultaneity in signed languages: Form and function, 258–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vermeerbergen, Myriam, Lorraine Leeson, & Onno Crasborn
eds. Simultaneity in signed languages: Form and function Amsterdam John Benjamins
Wilcox, Phyllis P.
1996Deontic and epistemic modals in ASL: Discourse analysis. In Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse, and language, 481–492. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman & Barbara Shaffer
2006Modality in American Sign Language. In William Frawley, Wolfgang Klein & Stephen Levinson (eds.), Expression of cognitive categories: The expression of modality, 207–237. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman & Phyllis P. Wilcox
1995The gestural expression of modality in ASL. In Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 135–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman, Paolo Rossini & Elena Antinoro Pizzuto
2010Grammaticalization in sign languages. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages, 332–354. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman
2004Gesture and language: Cross-linguistic and historical data from signed languages. Gesture 4(1). 43–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Symbol and symptom: Routes from gesture to signed language. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7. 89–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xavier, André Nogueira & Sherman Wilcox
2014Necessity and possibility modals in Brazilian Sign Language (Libras). Linguistic Typology 18(3). 449–448. CrossrefGoogle Scholar