SAY-complementizers and indexical shift in Poshkart Chuvash
With emphasis on communicative reception reports
Although SAY-complementizers have been extensively documented, the question of the forms used in this
function and their specific properties has received less attention. The paper focuses on the complementizer tenine (an
action nominalization of SAY), which is used with communicative reception verbs (‘hear’, ‘read’, etc.), in a dialect of Chuvash (Turkic).
The main puzzle concerns the difference between tenine and the more general complementizer teze (the
same-subject converb of SAY) with respect to the controller of shifted first person (namely, teze, but not
tenine, disallows non-subject controllers). An account of this restriction based on three independent language-specific
constraints is offered. An alternative account is discussed whereby tenine (and teze) are
synchronically non-finite forms of SAY. The findings highlight the importance of the form of the complementizer as well as of
the choice of controller for shifted 1st person in SAY-based complementation and extend the typological parameters of indexical shift.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.SAY-complementizers in Poshkart Chuvash
- 2.1Poshkart Chuvash
- 2.2(Participle-based) nominalized clauses
- 2.3The lexical (contentful) verb te ‘say’
- 2.4Clauses headed by teze
- 2.5Clauses headed by (action) nominalizations of te ‘say’
- 2.5.1Clauses headed by tenine
- 2.5.2Clauses headed by teni
- 2.5.3Nominalizations of te ‘say’ in other cases
- 2.6Participles of te ‘say’
- 3.Indexical shift in Poshkart Chuvash
- 3.1Some general discussion of indexical shift
- 3.2Parameters of indexical shift in Poshkart Chuvash
- 3.2.1Which indexicals shift
- 3.2.2Which verbs and complement types allow shifting
- 3.2.3Optionality of shift
- 4.The puzzle: Shifted first person in communicative reception reports
- 4.1Introducing the puzzle
- 4.2The choice of controller for shifted 1st person
- 5.An alternative: Syntactic decomposition of SAY-complementizers
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References
References (57)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2008. Semi-direct speech: Manambu and beyond. Language Sciences 301. 383–422.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2014. The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In Alexandra Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), The grammar of knowledge. A cross-linguistic typology, 1–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anand, Pranav & Valentine Hacquard. 2014. Factivity, belief and discourse. In Luka Crnič and Uli Sauerland, The art and craft of semantics: A festschrift for Irene Heim, 69–90. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Anand, Pranav & Andrew Nevins. 2004. Shifty operators in changing contexts. In Robert B. Young (ed.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory XIV1, 20–37. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Anand, Pranav. 2006. De de se. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.
Ašmarin, Nikolaj I. 1898. Materialy dlja izsledovanija čuvašskogo jazyka [Materials for the study of the Chuvash language]. Kazan: Tipo-litografija imperatorskago universiteta.
Banfield, Ann. 1973. Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech. Foundations of Language 101.1–39.
Bogal-Allbritten, Elizabeth & Keir Moulton. 2018. Nominalized clauses and reference to propositional content. In Robert Truswell, Chris Cummins, Caroline Heycock, Brian Rabern & Hannah Rohde, Processing of Sinn und Bedeutung 211, 215–232. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cattell, Ray. 1978. The source of interrogative adverbs. Language 541. 61–77.
Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 661. 764–805.
Clements, George N. 1975. The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: Its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages 101: 141–77.
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coulmas, Florian. 1986. Reported speech: Some general issues. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech, 1–28. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Curnow, Timothy Jowan. 2002. Three types of verbal logophoricity in African languages. Studies in African Linguistics 311. 1–25.
Deal, Amy Rose. 2018. Indexiphors: notes on embedded indexicals, shifty agreement, and logophoricity. In Rodica Ivan (ed.), UMOP 40: The leader of the pack: A festschrift in honor of Peggy Speas, 59–86. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Deal, Amy Rose. 2020. A theory of indexical shift: Meaning, grammar, and crosslinguistic variation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Evans, Nicholas. 2013. Some problems in the typology of quotation: A canonical approach. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 66–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Güldemann, Tom & Manfred von Roncador. 2002. Preface. In Tom Güldemann & Manfred von Roncador (eds.), Reported discourse: A meeting ground for different linguistic domains, vii–ix. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Güldemann, Tom. 2008. Quotative indexes in African languages: A synchronic and diachronic survey. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Hansen, Björn, Alexander Letuchiy & Izabela Błaszczyk. 2016. Complementizers in Slavonic. In Kasper Boye & Petar Kehayov (eds.), Complementizer semantics in European languages. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 57), 175–225. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyman, Larry M. & Bernard Comrie. 1981. Logophoric reference in Gokana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 31. 19–37.
Kaufmann, Magdalena, & Claudia Poschmann. 2013. Embedded imperatives: Empirical evidence from colloquial German. Language 891. 619–637.
Khanina, Olesya. n.d. Sentencial’nye aktanty čuvašskogo jazyka. Unplublished fieldwork report. Unpublished manuscript. Moscow State University.
Knyazev, Mikhail. 2016. Complementizers in Kalmyk. In Kasper Boye & Petar Kehayov (eds.), Complementizer semantics in European languages. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 57), 655–679. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Knyazev, Mikhail. 2019. Two say-complementizers in Poshkart Chuvash. Subject-orientation, logophoricity and indexical shift under verbs of hearing. In Tatiana Bondarenko, Colin Davis, Justin Colley & Dmitry Privoznov (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics (WAFL14), 137–144. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Koptjevskaya-Tamm, Maria. 1993. Nominalizations. London: Routledge.
Kožemjakina, Nastja. 2017. Nekotorye dannye o konstrukcijax s sentencial’nym aktantom v čuvašskom jazyke (malokaračinskiij dialekt) [Some data on sentential complement constructions in the Maloe Karachkino dialect of Chuvash]. Paper presented at a fieldwork seminar, Maloe Karachkino, August 2017.
Li, Charles N. 1986. Direct and indirect speech: A functional study. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech: A functional study (Trends in Linguistics; Studies and Monographs 31), 29–46. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Logvinova, Natalia. 2019a. Neposessivnye funkcii pokazatelja posessivnosti tret’ego lica v malokaračkinskom govore čuvašskogo jazyka [Non-possessive functions of the third person possessive in Maloe Karachkino dialect of Chuvash]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana 15(2). 86–129.
Logvinova, Natalia. 2019b. Ob otnositel’nyx konstrukcijax i prišastijax v (malokaračkinskom) čuvašskom [On relative constructions and on participles in the Maloe Karachkino dialect of Chuvash]. Paper presented at a fieldwork seminar, Maloe Karachkino, August 2019.
Maier, Emar. 2016. A plea against monsters. Grazer Philosophische Studien 93(3). 363–395.
Maier, Emar. 2017. The pragmatics of attraction: Explaining unquotation in direct and free indirect discourse. In Paul Saka & Michael Johnson (eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of quotation, 259–280. Cham: Springer.
Messick, Troy. 2017. The morphosyntax of self-ascription: A cross-linguistic study. Storrs: University of Connecticut PhD dissertation.
Munro, Robert, Rainer Ludwig, Uli Sauerland & David W. Fleck. 2012. Reported speech in Matses: Perspective persistence and evidential narratives. International Journal of American Linguistics 78(1). 41–75.
Nikitina, Tatiana. 2012. Personal deixis and reported discourse: Towards a typology of person alignment. Linguistic Typology 161. 233–263.
Özyıldız, Deniz, Travis Major, and Emar Maier. 2019. Communicative Reception Reports as Hear-say: Evidence from Indexical Shift in Turkish. In Richard Stockwell, Maura O’Leary, Zhongshi Xu & Z. L. Zhou (eds.), Proceedings of the 36th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 296–305. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Podobryaev, Alexander. 2014. Persons, imposters, and monsters. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.
Polinsky, Maria. 2015. Embedded finite complements, indexical shift, and binding in Tsez. Languages of the Caucasus 11. 1–37.
Rice, Keren. 1986. Some remarks on direct and indirect speech in Slave (Northern Athapaskan). In Florian Coulmas (ed.), Direct and indirect speech, 47–76. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Schlenker, Philippe. 2003. A plea for monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy 261. 29–120.
Schlenker, Philippe. 2011. Indexicality and de se reports. In Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienbor & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, 1561–1604. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Sells, Peter. 1987. Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 181. 445–479.
Simons, Mandy. 2007. Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition. Lingua 1171. 1034–1056.
Shklovsky, Kirill & Yasutada Sudo. 2014. The syntax of monsters. Linguistic Inquiry 451. 381–40.
Spronck, Sjef & Tatiana Nikitina. 2019. Reported speech forms a dedicated syntactic domain. Linguistic Typology 231. 1–41.
Steever, Sanford B. 2002. Direct and indirect discourse in Tamil. In Tom Güldemann and Manfred von Roncador (eds.), Reported discourse: A meeting ground for different linguistic domains, 91–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stephenson, Tamina. 2007. Judge dependence, epistemic modals, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics & Philosophy 301. 487–525.
Sudo, Yasutada. 2010. The syntax and semantics of indexical shifting in Modern Uyghur. Unpublished manuscript. MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Sundaresan, Sandhya. 2018. An alternative model of indexical shift: Variation and selection without context-overwriting. lingbuzz/004115. Available at: [URL] (last access 12 December 2021).
Williams, Edwin. 1992. Adjunct control. In Richard Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri & James Higginbotham (eds.), Control and grammar, 297–322. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.