Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 46:4 (2022) ► pp.934–993

Cross-linguistic patterns in the lexicalisation of bring and take

ORCID logo | Monash University,
ORCID logo | CNRS-SeDyL,
ORCID logo | Universität zu Köln,
| University of Zurich,
ORCID logo | Universität zu Köln, | CNRS-LaCiTO,
ORCID logo | University of Zurich,
ORCID logo | Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft,
| Monash University,
ORCID logo | Universität zu Köln,
This study investigates the linguistic expression of bring and take events and more generally of the semantic domain of directed caused accompanied motion (‘directed CAM’) across a sample of eight languages of the Pacific and the Americas. Unlike English, the majority of languages in our sample do not lexicalise directed CAM events by simple verbs, but rather encode the defining meaning components – caused motion, accompaniment, and directedness – in morphosyntactically complex constructions. The study shows a high degree of crosslinguistic diversity, even among closely related languages. Meaning components are contributed to directed CAM expressions by a mix of lexical semantics, morphosyntax, and pragmatic means. The study proposes a text-based, semantic typology of directed CAM events by drawing on corpus data from endangered languages.
Keywords: caused motion, accompanied motion, event representation, semantic typology, text-based typology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and methodology
  • 3.Meaning components of directed CAM events
    • 3.1Deictic and non-deictic directedness
    • 3.2Manner
      • 3.2.1Manner of caused motion
      • 3.2.2Manner of motion
    • 3.3Features of the theme object
  • 4.Patterns in the lexicalisation of directed CAM events
    • 4.1Directed CAM
      • 4.1.1CAM in a deictically specific direction
      • 4.1.2Manner of caused accompanied motion in a direction
    • 4.2Caused motion from a direction
    • 4.3Caused accompanied motion
    • 4.4Accompaniment
    • 4.5Caused motion
    • 4.6Motion
      • 4.6.1Directed motion
      • 4.6.2Manner of motion
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19088.mar
References (130)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix. 1995. The linguistic construction of space in Ewe. Cognitive Linguistics 6(2–3). 139–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. & James Essegbey. 2013. Serialising languages: Satellite-framed, verb-framed or neither. Ghana Journal of Linguistics 2(1). 19–38.Google Scholar
Ameka, Felix K. & Stephen C. Levinson. 2007. The typology and semantics of locative predicates: Posturals, positionals, and other beasts. Linguistics 45(5–6). 847–1151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Michael. 1992. Object classifying morphemes in Sudest. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 23(2). 193–198.Google Scholar
Anderson, Michael & Thera Anderson. 1991. Sudest grammar essentials. Milne Bay Province: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Anderson, Michael & Malcolm Ross. 2002. Sudest. In John Lynch, Malcolm Ross, & Crowley (eds.), The Oceanic languages, 322–346. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon.Google Scholar
Arnold, Jennifer E. 2008. Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-oriented processes. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(4). 495–527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Paul Kay. 1969. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2015. A practical epistemology for semantic elicitation in the field and elsewhere. In M. Ryan Bochnak & Lisa Matthewson (eds.), Methodologies in semantic fieldwork, 13–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, N. J. Enfield, James Essegbey & Sotaro Kita. 2010. The macro-event property: The segmentation of causal chains. In Jürgen Bohnemeyer & Eric Pederson (eds.), Event representation in language and cognition, 43–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Melissa Bowerman & Penelope Brown. 2001. Cut and break clips. In Stephen C Levinson & N. J. Enfield (eds.), Manual for the field season 2001, 90–96. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Nicholas J. Enfield, James Essegbey, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Sotaro Kita, Friederike Lüpke & Felix K. Ameka. 2007. Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language 83(3). 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Eric Pederson. 2010. Event representation in language and cognition (Language, Culture & Cognition 11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdin, Philippe. 1997. On goal-bias across languages: modal, configurational and orientational parameters. In Bohumil Palek (ed.), Typology: prototypes, item orderings and universals (Proceedings of LP ’96), 185–218. Prague: Charles University Press.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa, Marianne Gullberg & Bhuvana Narasimhan. 2004. Put project: The crosslinguistic encoding of placement events. In Asifa Majid (ed.), Field Manual Volume 9, 10–24. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa & Eric Pederson. 1992. Topological relations picture series. In Stephen C. Levinson (ed.), Space stimuli kit 1.2: November 1992, 511. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Buseman, Alan & Karen Buseman. 2019. Field linguist’s toolbox. SIL International. SIL International. Available at [URL] (last access 9 February 2022).
Cadierno, Teresa, Iraide Ibarretxe Antunano & Alberto Hijazo-Gascon. 2016. Semantic categorization of placement verbs in L1 And L2 Danish and Spanish. Language Learning 66(1). 191–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Alice, Nicholas Evans, Darja Hoenigman & Lila San Roque. 2009. The family problems picture task. Designed for use by the Social Cognition and Language Project. A collaboration of The Australian National University, Griffith University, University of Melbourne and the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace (ed.). 1980. The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2003. Recipient person suppletion in the verb “give.” In Mary Ruth Wise, Thomas N. Headland and Brend, Ruth M. (eds), Language and life: Essays in memory of Kenneth L. Pike, 265–281. Dallas: SIL International and the University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
. 2012. Some argument-structure properties of “give” in the languages of Europe and Northern and Central Asia. In Pirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie & Valery Solovyev (eds.), Argument structure and grammatical relations: A crosslinguistic typology, 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contini-Morava, Ellen & Marcin Kilarski. 2013. Functions of nominal classification. Language Sciences 401. 263–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creissel, Denis. 2006. Encoding the distinction between source, location and destination. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in language: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 19–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William, Jóhanna Barðdal, Willem Hollman, Violeta Sotirova & Chiaki Taoka. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Hans C. Boas (ed.), Contrastive studies in Construction Grammar, Vol. 101 (Constructional Approaches to Grammar), 201–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Andrade, Roy. 1995. The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Defina, Rebecca. 2016. Do serial verb constructions describe single events? A study of co-speech gestures in Avatime. Language 92(4). 890–910. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1982. The semantics of giving. In Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), Where have all the adjectives gone? and other essays in semantics and syntax. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992. A new approach to English grammar, on semantic principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Döhler, Christian. forthcoming. Expressions of directed caused accompanied motion in Komnzo. In Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg & Birgit Hellwig (eds.), Caused accompanied motion: Bringing and taking events in a cross-linguistic perspective (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Enfield, N. J. 2007. Encoding three-participant events in the Lao clause. Linguistics 45(3). 509–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, Alice Gaby, Stephen C. Levinson & Asifa Majid (eds.). 2011. Reciprocals and semantic Typology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gipper, Sonja. forthcoming. The expression of directed caused accompanied motion events in Yurakaré: Semantics, pragmatics, and interactional variability. In Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg & Birgit Hellwig (eds.), Bringing and taking: a cross-linguistic perspective on caused accompanied motion events (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Gropen, Jess, Steven Pinker, Michelle Hollander, Richard Goldberg & Ronald Wilson. 1989. The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language 65(2). 203–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guillaume, Antoine & Harold Koch (eds.). 2021. Associated Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank. 2021. Glottolog 4.4. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available at [URL] (last access 9 February 2022).
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and transitivity, (Studies in Language Companion Series 23), 87–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Universals of causative and anticausative verb formation and the spontaneity scale. Lingua Posnaniensis 58(2). 33–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haude, Katharina. 2006. A grammar of Movima. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit PhD dissertation.
. forthcoming. Expressing directional caused accompanied motion in Movima. In Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg & Birgit Hellwig (eds.), Caused accompanied motion: Bringing and taking events in a cross-linguistic perspective (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Haude, Katharina & Silke A. Beuse (eds.). 2012. Annotated Multimedia Documentation of Movima. Nijmegen: DoBeS Archive. Available at [URL] (last access 9 February 2022).
Hellwig, Birgit. 2007. Postural categories and the classification of nominal concepts: A case study of Goemai. In Andrea C. Schalley & Dietmar Zaefferer (eds.), Ontolinguistics. How ontological status shapes the linguistic coding of concepts, 279–297. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hellwig, Birgit, Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg & Melanie Schippling. forthcoming. Bringing and taking: a cross-linguistic perspective on caused accompanied motion events. In Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg & Birgit Hellwig (eds.), Caused accompanied motion: Bringing and taking events in a cross-linguistic perspective (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Hendriks, Henriette, Maya Hickmann & Annie-Claude Demagny. 2008. How adult English learners of French express caused motion: A comparison with English and French natives. Aile: Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangere 271. 15–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & Sonja Riesberg. 2013. Symmetrical voice and applicative alternations: Evidence from Totoli. Oceanic Linguistics 52(2). 396–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. forthcoming. Expressions of directed caused accompanied motion events in Totoli, a western Austronesian language of Indonesia. In Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg & Birgit Hellwig (eds.), Bringing and taking: a cross-linguistic perspective on caused accompanied motion events (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Ikegami, Yoshihiko. 1987. ‘Source’ and ‘Goal’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In René Dirven & Günter Radden (eds.), Concept of case, 122–146. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition (Current Studies in Linguistics Series 8). Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ji, Yinglin, Henriette Hendriks & Maya Hickmann. 2011. How children express caused motion events in Chinese and English: Universal and language-specific influences. Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 121(12). 1796–1819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ji, Yinglin & Jill Hohenstein. 2014. The syntactic packaging of caused motion components in a second language: English learners of Chinese. Lingua 1401. 100–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jung, Dagmar, Julia Colleen Miller, Patrick Moore, Olga Lovick, Carolina Pasamonik & Gabriele Schwiertz (née Müller). 2011. Beaver Language Archive. Nijmegen: DoBeS Archive. Available at [URL] (last access 9 February 2022).
Kittilä, Seppo. 2006. The anomaly of the verb ‘give’ explained by its high (formal and semantic) transitivity. Linguistics 44(3). 569–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koch, Harold. 1984. The category of ‘associated motion’ in Kaytej. Language in Central Australia 11. 23–34.Google Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta, Miyuki Ishibashi & Marine Vuillermet (eds.). 2021. Source-Goal asymmetries across languages. Studies in Language 45(1).Google Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Bhuvana Narasimhan. 2012. Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective (Typological Studies in Language 100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakusta, Laura & Barbara Landau. 2005. Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 96(1). 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakusta, Laura, Laura Wagner, Kirsten O’Hearn & Barbara Landau. 2007. Conceptual foundations of spatial language: Evidence for a Goal bias in infants. Language Learning and Development 3(3). 179–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leto, Claudia, Winarno S. Alamudi, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, Jani Kuhnt-Saptodewo, Sonja Riesberg & Hasan Basri. 2010. Totoli Documentation. Nijmegen: DoBeS Archive. Available at [URL] (last access 9 February 2022).
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: a preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1996. Introduction to part II. In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 17), 133–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2003. Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity (Language, Culture, and Cognition 5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C., Sarah Cutfield, Michael Dunn, Nick J. Enfield, Sérgio Meira & David P. Wilkins (eds.). 2018. Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective (Language Culture and Cognition 14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. & D. P. Wilkins. 2006. Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lier, Eva van. 2012. Referential effects on the expression of three-participant events across languages: An introduction in memory of Anna Siewierska. Linguistic Discovery 10(3): 1–16.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1997. The linguistics of “color.” In C. L. Hardin & Luisa Maffi (eds.), Color categories in thought and language, 320–346. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A. & Suzanne Gaskins. 2001. Grammatical categories and the development of classification preferences: A comparative approach. In Melissa Bowerman & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (Language, Culture and Cognition 3), 257–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüpke, Friederike. 2007. On giving, receiving, affecting and benefitting in Jalonke. Linguistics 45(3). 539–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majid, Asifa, Melissa Bowerman, Miriam van Staden & James S. Boster. 2007. The semantic categories of cutting and breaking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 18(2). 133–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margetts, Anna. 1999. Valence and transitivity in Saliba: An Oceanic language of Papua New Guinea. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
. 2002. The linguistic encoding of three-participant events in Saliba. Studies in Language 26(3). 613–636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Three-participant events in Oceanic languages. Oceanic Linguistics 46(1). 71–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Learning verbs without boots and straps? The problem of “give” in Saliba. In Melissa Bowerman & Penelope Brown (eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives on argument structure: Implications for learnability, 111–137. New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2011. Transitivity in Saliba-Logea. Studies in Language 35(3). 650–675. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. forthcoming. Directed caused accompanied motion events in Saliba-Logea. In Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg & Birgit Hellwig (eds.), Caused accompanied motion: Bringing and taking events in a cross-linguistic perspective (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Margetts, Anna & Peter K. Austin. 2007. Three-participant events in the languages of the world: towards a crosslinguistic typology. Linguistics 45(3). 393–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Margetts, Anna, Andrew Margetts, Carmen Dawuda & John Hajek. 2013. Saliba-Logea corpus. Nijmegen: DoBeS Archive. Available at [URL] (last access 9 February 2022).
Margetts, Anna, Sonja Riesberg & Birgit Hellwig (eds.). forthcoming. Caused accompanied motion: Bringing and taking events in a cross-linguistic perspective (Typological Studies in Language 134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Mayer, Mercer. 1969. Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Books.Google Scholar
Montero-Melis, Guillermo. 2017. Thoughts in motion: The role of long-term L1 and short-term L2 experience when talking and thinking of caused motion. Stockholm: Stockholm University PhD dissertation.
Montero-Melis, Guillermo & Emanuel Bylund. 2017. Getting the ball rolling: The cross-linguistic conceptualization of caused motion. Language and Cognition 9(3). 446–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike. 2014. “Cut” and “carry” in Teop. Australian National University. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
. 2020. CUT-verbs of the Oceanic language Teop, a critical study of collecting and analysing data in a language documentation project. In Helen Bromhead and Zhengdao Ye (eds), Meaning, life and culture: In conversation with Anna Wierzbicka, 355–379. Canberra: ANU Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, Bhuvana, Sonja Eisenbeiss & Penelope Brown. 2007. “Two’s company, more is a crowd”: The linguistic encoding of multiple-participant events. Linguistics 45(3). 383–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, Bhuvana, Anetta Kopecka, Melissa Bowerman, Marianne Gullberg & Asifa Majid. 2012. Putting and taking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, John. 1996. Give: A cognitive linguistic study (Cognitive Linguistics Research 7). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 1998. The linguistics of giving (Typological Studies in Language 36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ospina-Bozzi, Ana María & Caterine Cita-Triana. 2021. Exploring source/goal asymmetries in spontaneous and caused motion expression in Yuhup. Studies in Language 45(1). 172–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew. 1987. Encoding events in Kalam and English: different logics for reporting experience. In Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (Typological Studies in Language 11), 329–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Jonathan Lane. 1998. From event sequence to grammar: Serial verb constructions in Kalam. In Anna Siewierska & Jae Jung Song (eds.), Case, typology and grammar (Typological Studies in Language 38), 201–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Randoja, Tiina K. 1990. The phonology and morphology of Halfway River Beaver. Ottawa: University of Ottawa PhD dissertation.
Regier, Terry & Paul Kay. 2009. Language, thought, and color: Whorf was half right. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(10). 439–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regier, Terry & Mingyu Zheng. 2007. Attention to Endpoints: A Cross-Linguistic Constraint on Spatial Meaning. Cognitive Science 31(4). 705–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, Keren. 1989. A grammar of Slave. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riesberg, Sonja, Kurt Malcher & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 2021. The many ways of transitivization in Totoli. In Silvia Luraghi & Elisa Roma (eds.), Valency over time: Diachronic perspectives on valency patterns and valency orientation, 235–264. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 2004. Demonstratives, local nouns and directionals in Oceanic languages: a diachronic perspective. In Gunter Senft (ed.), Deixis and demonstratives in Oceanic languages (Pacific Linguistics 562), 175–204. Caberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Saunders, Barbara A. C. & Jaan van Brakel. 1997. Are there nontrivial constraints on colour categorization? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20(2). 167–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, Ronald P. 1997. Talmy’s schematic core and verb serialization in Emai: An initial sketch. In Robert K. Herbert (ed.), African linguistics at the crossroads: Papers from Kwaluseni, 311–340. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Schnell, Stefan. 2011. A grammar of Vera’a, an Oceanic language from North Vanuatu. Kiel: University of Kiel PhD dissertation.
. 2012. Referential Hierarchies in Three-Participant Constructions in Vera’a. Linguistic Discovery 10(3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Multi-CAST Vera’a. In Geoffrey Haig (ed.), Multi-CAST: Multilingual corpus of annotated spoken texts. Available at [URL] (last access 9 February 2022).
. forthcoming. Caused accompanied motion constructions in Vera’a. In Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg & Birgit Hellwig (eds.), Bringing and taking: a cross-linguistic perspective on caused accompanied motion events (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Schnell, Stefan, Makson Vorēs, Charity Hope, George Atkins, Janet Atkins & Armstrong Malau. 2006. Vera’a corpus. Nijmegen: DoBeS Archive. Available at [URL] (last access 9 February 2022).
Schwiertz, Gabriele. 2009. Intonation & prosodic structure of Beaver (Athabaskan): Explorations on the language of the Danezaa. Köln: Universität zu Köln PhD dissertation.
Seifart, Frank. 2009. Bora documentation. In Frank Seifart, Doris Fagua, Jürg Gasché & Juan Alvaro Echeverri (eds.), A multimedia documentation of the languages of the People of the Center. Online publication of transcribed and translated Bora, Ocaina, Nonuya, Resígaro, and Witoto audio and video recordings with linguistic and ethnographic annotations and descriptions. Nijmegen: DoBeS Archive. Available at [URL] (last access 9 February 2022).
. forthcoming. Bora caused accompanied motion events. In Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg & Birgit Hellwig (eds.), Caused Accompanied Motion: Bringing and taking events in a cross-linguistic perspective (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sheppard, Harriet. 2020. Verbal morphosyntax and three-participant events in Sudest. Melbourne: Monash University PhD dissertation.
. 2021. Vanga Vanatina (Sudest) corpus. Nijmegen: DoBeS Archive. Available at [URL] (last access 9 February 2022).
. forthcoming. Directed caused accompanied motion events in Sudest, an Oceanic language with classificatory verbs. In Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg & Birgit Hellwig (eds.), Caused Accompanied Motion: Bringing and taking events in a cross-linguistic perspective (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Siewierska, Anna & Eva van Lier. 2011. ‘Introduce’ cross-linguistically – Towards a typology of non-prototypical three-participant construction. Paper presented at the 9th Biennial Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology. Hong Kong.
Sinha, Chris & Tania Kuteva. 1995. Distributed spatial semantics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 18(02). 167–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömquist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, 219–257. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Staden, Miriam van & Ger P. Reesink. 2008. Serial verb constructions in a linguistic area. In Gunter Senft (ed.), Serial verb constructions in Austronesian and Papuan languages (Pacific Linguistics 594), 17–54. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2018. The goal bias revisited: A collostructional approach. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 6(1). 143–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Ada Rohde. 2004. The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation, 249–268. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 31: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 17(1). 480–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
. 2008. Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Seyda Ozcaliskan (eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language. Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, 389–402. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Thiesen, Wesley & Eva Thiesen. 1998. Diccionario Bora-Castellano, Castellano-Bora (Serie Lingüística Peruana 46). Yarinacocha: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Thiesen, Wesley & David Weber. 2012. A grammar of Bora with special attention to tone (SIL International Publications in Linguistics 148). Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegener, Claudia. 2012. A grammar of Savosavo (Mouton Grammar Library 61). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. forthcoming. The expression of directed caused accompanied motion events in Savosavo. In Anna Margetts, Riesberg Sonja & Birgit Hellwig (eds.), Caused accompanied motion: Bringing and taking events in a cross-linguistic perspective (Typological Studies in Language). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Wegener, Claudia, Aurélie Cauchard, Ian Scales & Eva Schultze-Berndt. 2016. Savosavo and Gela documentation. Nijmegen: DoBeS Archive. Available at [URL] (last access 9 February 2022).
Wilkins, David P. 1991. The semantics, pragmatics and diachronic development of ‘associated motion’ in Mparntwe Arrernte. Buffalo Papers in Linguistics 11. 207–257.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David P. & Deborah Hill. 1995. When GO means COME: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive linguistics 6(2/3). 209–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann & Han Sloetjes. 2006. ELAN: a Professional Framework for Multimodality Research. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’06). Genoa, Italy: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Koval, Sergey & Sergey Loesov
2024. The ventive and the deictic shift. Studies in Language DOI logo
Ryzhova, Daria, Ekaterina Rakhilina, Tatiana Reznikova & Yulia Badryzlova
2024. Lexical systems with systematic gaps: verbs of falling. Folia Linguistica 58:1 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Torres Soler, Julio & Renata Enghels
2023. From Motion to Causation: The Diachrony of the Spanish Causative Constructions with traer (‘Bring’) and llevar (‘Take’). Languages 8:2 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.