Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 2:3 (1978) ► pp.397–412
Book review

R. Schank. Conceptual Information Processing [Fundamental Studies in Computer Science, 3]. North-Holland, 1975. viii-384 pp. $31.25

Reviewed by
 | Dept. of Artificial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh
Published online: 1 January 1978
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.2.3.11wil
References (26)
Bibliography
Bobrow, D. 1968, Natural language input for a computer problem-solving system, in (Minsky. ed.) Semantic Information Processing, Cambridge, Mass. 146–226.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. 1970, Meaning and the Structure of Language. ChicagoGoogle Scholar
Charniak, E. and Wilks, Y. (eds), 1976, Computational Semantics, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. 1968, The case for case, in (Bach & Harms. eds.) Universals in Linguistic Theory, New York.Google Scholar
Hayes, P. J. 1975, Computer programming as a cognitive paradigm, Nature, Vol. 2541, 563–566.Google Scholar
Haus, D. 1964, Dependency Theory, Language, Vol 401.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1971, On Generative Semantics, in (Steinberg and Jakobovits. eds.) Semantics, Cambridge, 232–296.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Thompson, H. 1975a, Introducing Cognitive Grammar, in Proc. First Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Soc.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1975b, Pragmatics in Natural Logic, in (Keenan. ed.) Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge, 253–286.Google Scholar
Lamb, S. 1966, Outline of Stratificational Grammar, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Masterman, M. 1961, Semantic Message Detection in Proc. Conf on Machine Translation and Applied Language Analysis, London.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. 1974, Review of Lighthill, J. (ed.) Artificial Intelligence, in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 51, 317–322.Google Scholar
Minsky, M. 1975, On Frame Systems, in (Winston. ed.) Visual Information Processing, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Rieger, C. 1975, The Common-sense algorithm, as in (Chafe 1975), 199–214.Google Scholar
Schank, R. 1968, Semantic Categories, Tracor Corp., Texas, Doc. No. 681 551–4.Google Scholar
1974, Understanding Paragraphs, memo no. 61, Institute for Semantic and Cognitive Studies, Castagnola.Google Scholar
1975, Using Knowledge to Understand, as in (Chafe 1975), 131–135.Google Scholar
Schank, R., and Wilks, Y. 1974, The Goals of Linguistic Theory Revisited, Lingua, Vol. 341, 301–326.Google Scholar
Schank, R. et al.. 1970, Spinoza II, Stanford Univ. Artificial Intelligence Laboratory memo no. 1091.Google Scholar
Wilks, Y. 1967, Semantic Consistency in text, Systems Development Corp., Calif., Doc. SP-2758.Google Scholar
1974, One small head models and theories in linguistics, Foundations of Languages, Vol. II1, 77–95.Google Scholar
1975a, Preference Semantics, in (Keenan. ed) Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge, 329–348.Google Scholar
1975b, An Intelligent Analyzer and Understander of English, Communications of the A.C.M., Vol. 181, 264–274.Google Scholar
Winograd, T. 1971, Procedures as a representation for data in a computer program for understanding natural language, TR-84, M. I. T., Project MAC, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Woods, W. 1968, Procedural Semantics for a question-answering machine, Proc. AFIPS Fall Joint Computer Conference, Wayne, Pa. 457–471.Google Scholar
1970, Transition network grammars for natural language analysis, Communications of the A.C.M., Vol. 131, 591–606.Google Scholar