Book review
Barbara A. Fox. Discourse structure and anaphora. Written and conversational English [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 48]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19871993. Paperback.viii, 173 pp. ISBN 0 521 43990 6 $17.95
References (14)
Biber, D.
(
1988):
Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fritz, G.
(
1982):
Kohärenz. Grundfragen der linguistischen Kommunikationsanalyse. Tübingen: Narr.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimes, J.
(
1975):
The thread of discourse. The Hague: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hundsnurscher, F.
(
1980): “
Konversationsanalyse versus Dialoggrammatik“. In:
Rupp, H./
Roloff, H. -G. (eds):
Akten des VI. lnternationalen Germanisten-Kongresses. Basel 1980 Teil 2. Bern: Lang, 89–95.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hundsnurscher, F.
(
1992): “
Does a dialogical view of language amount to a paradigm change in linguistics: language as dialogue“. In:
Stati, S./
Weigand, E. (eds):
Methodologie der Dialoganalyse. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1–14.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mann, W./Matthiessen, C./Thompson, S.
(
1982):
Rhetorical structures report. Ms.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McKeown, K.
(
1982):
Generating natural language text in response to questions about database structure. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, H./Schegloff, E./Jefferson, G.
(
1974): “
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation“.
Language 501, 696–735.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stati, S.
(
1990):
Le transphrastique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, T. A.
(
1985): “
Introduction: Levels and dimensions of discourse analysis“. In:
van Dijk, T. A. (ed.):
Handbook of discourse analysis. Vol. II1. London etc.: Academic Press, 1–11.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weigand, E.
(
1989):
Sprache als Dialog. Sprechakttaxonomie und kommunikative Grammatik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weigand, E.
(
1991): “
The dialogic principle revisited. Speech acts and mental states“. In:
Stati, S./
Weigand, E./
Hundsnurscher, F. (eds):
Dialoganalyse III. Referate der 3. Arbeitstagung, Bologna 1990 Part 1. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 75–104.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weigand, E.
(
1993): “
Mündlich und schriftlich – ein Verwirrspiel“. In:
Löftier, H. (ed.):
Dialoganalyse IV. Referate der 4. Arbeitstagung, Basel 1992 Part 1. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 137–150.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weigand, E.
(
1995): “
Looking for the point of the dialogic turn“. In:
Hundsnurscher, F./
Weigand, E. (eds):
Future perspectives of dialogue analysis. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 95–120.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Weigand, Edda
2021.
Dialogue.
Language and Dialogue 11:3
► pp. 457 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.