1992 “Clausal focus versus discourse rhema in German: A programmatic view”. In: Gilbers and Looyenga (eds), Language and Cognition. Yearbook University of Groningen 1–18. Groningen.
Chomsky, N.
1989 “Some notes on economy of derivation and representation”. Ms. (Also in Freidin, R. (ed.) 1991 Principles and parameters in comparative grammar 417–54. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.)
Chomsky, N.
1992 “A Minimalist program for linguistic theory”. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 11].
Cinque, G.
1990/93 “The null hypothesis of phrasal stress”. Linguistic Inquiry 24(1).
Grimshaw, J.
1981 “Form, function and the language acquisition device”. In: Baker, C.; and McCarthy, J. (eds), The logical problem of language acquisition 165–182. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kayne, R. S.
1994The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Larson, R. K.
1988 “On the double object construction”. Linguistic Inquiry 191:335–391.
Larson, R. K.
1990 “Double object revisited”. Linguistic Inquiry 211:589–632.
Lenerz, J.
1993 “Zur Syntax der Pronomina im Deutschen”. In: Reis, M. (ed.), Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer [Linguistische Arbeiten 2571].
Ouhalla, J.
1991Functional categories and parametric variation. London: Routledge.
Pesetsky, D.
1987 “WH-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding”. In: Reuland, E.; and ter Meulen, A. (eds), The representation of (in-)definiteness 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pollack, J. -Y.
1989 “Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP”. Linguistic Inquiry 201: 365–424.
Wegener, H.
1985Der Dativ im heutigen Deutsch. Tübingen: Narr [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 281].
Wegener, H.
1990 “Der Dativ – ein struktureller Kasus?” In: Fanselow, G.; and Felix, S.Strukturen und Merkmale syntaktischer Kategorien 70–103. Tübingen: Narr, 70–103 [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 391].