Article in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 46:2 (2022) ► pp. 352375
References
Aissen, Judith
2003Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(3). 435–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aristar, Anthony R.
1997Marking and hierarchy types and the grammaticalization of case-markers. Studies in Language 21(2). 313–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1986Markedness, grammar, people, and the world. In Fred R. Eckman, Edith A. Moravcsik & Jesica R. Wirth (Eds.), Markedness, 85–106. New York: Plenum Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis & Céline Mounole
2011Animacy and spatial cases: Typological tendencies, and the case of Basque. In: Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski (eds.), Case, animacy and semantic roles, 157–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denghani, A.
2002Iranian Azari. München/Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen
1997Camling. München/Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Stefanie
2012Constructional effects of involuntary and inanimate Agents: A cross-linguistic study. University of Leuven dissertation.Google Scholar
Iemmolo, Giorgio
2011Differential Object Marking. Pavia: University of Pavia PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Iggesen, Oliver A.
2013Number of Cases. In: Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/49, Accessed on 2020-03-17.)
Kittilä, Seppo
2008Animacy effects on Differential Goal Marking. Linguistic Typology 12(2). 245–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo & Ylikoski, Jussi
2011Remarks on the coding of Direction, Recipient and Vicinal Direction in European Uralic. In: Kittilä, Seppo, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski (eds.), Case, animacy and semantic roles, 29–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klavan, Jane
2012Evidence in linguistics: corpus-linguistic and experimental methods for studying grammatical synonymy. Tartu: University of Tartu PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Bhuvana Narasimhan
(eds.) 2012Events of putting and taking: A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Andrew Spencer
2009Typology of case systems: Parameters and variation. In: Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), The Oxford handbook of case, 651–667. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Næss, Åshild
2003What markedness marks: The markedness problem with direct objects. Lingua 1141. 1186–1212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schulze, Wolfgang
1997Tsakhur. München/Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
2001Linguistic typology. Morphology and syntax. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Pilar M.
1997Basic verb types and argument structures in Shipibo-Conibo. Eugene: University of Oregon MA thesis.Google Scholar
2003Transitivity in Shipibo-Konibo grammar. Eugene: University of Oregon PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Watters, David
2003Kham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar