Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 45:4 (2021) ► pp.840–864

Plains Cree animacy–inanimacy hierarchy

Old facts and new insights

| First Nations University of Canada
| First Nations University of Canada
Like all Algonquian languages, Cree distributes its stock of nouns over two classes: animate and inanimate. While this distinction is firmly based on different agreement rules, and is to a large extent (but not completely) backed up by semantic differences, Cree nouns can also be put on a 4-level hierarchy scale, depending on their morphological valence with regard to whether or not they allow markers for the plural, obviative, vocative/honorific, absentative or which one of the two types of locatives. In addition, in a few recorded cases an inanimate noun may be reclassified, or “promoted”, as an animate noun, but rarely vice versa. Although this paper concentrates on Plains Cree, and examples are from that dialect unless otherwise noted, some observations are also made on (in)animacy in East Cree and in a wider Algonquian context.
Keywords: Plains Cree, gender, animacy, hierarchy, power, locomotion
Article outline
  • 1.Cree animacy and inanimacy: Semantic aspects
  • 2.Gender doublets and gender switches
  • 3.Agreement rules and gender reclassification
  • 4.Cree nominal suffix distribution and animacy hierarchy
    • 4.1Plural and obviative suffixes
    • 4.2Vocative/honorific and absentative
    • 4.3Locative and possessive suffixes
    • 4.4Cree animacy-inanimacy hierarchy
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 17 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20023.col
References (54)
References
Ahenakew, Freda. 1987 (reprinted 1989). Cree language structures: A Cree approach. Winnipeg: Pemmican Publications.Google Scholar
Anderson, Gregory D. S. 1997. On “animacy maximization” in Fox (Mesquakie). International Journal of American Linguistics 631. 227–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aristar, Anthony R. 1997. Marking and hierarchy types and the grammaticalization of case-markers. Studies in Language 21(2). 313–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arppe, Antti, Lene Antonsen, Trond Trosterud, Conor Snoek, Dorothy Thunder, Atticus Harrigan, Jordan Lachler, Jean Okimâsis & Arok Wolvengrey. N.d. Linguistic insights from computational modeling of Plains Cree morphology. Available at [URL] (last access 16 October 2020).
Black, Mary B. 1969. A note on gender in eliciting Ojibwa semantic structures. Anthropological Linguistics 111. 177–186.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1930. Sacred stories of the Sweet Grass Cree. Ottawa: National Museum of Canada Bulletin 60. [Reprinted by Fifth House Publishers 1993.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bobbish-Salt, Luci, Duff, Alice, Junker, Marie-Odile & Marguerite MacKenzie (eds.). 2012. Eastern James Bay Cree dictionary (Northern Dialect). Chisasibi (Quebec): Cree School Board.Google Scholar
Canadian Bible Society. 2000. Oski Testament (Western Cree New Testament). Toronto: Canadian Bible Society.Google Scholar
Collette, Vincent. 2014. Description de la morphologie grammaticale du cri de l’Est (dialecte de Whapmagoostui). PhD Thesis. Quebec: Université Laval.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989, 2nd edn. Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Clara (ed.). s.d. Chii-aaimin Weskach, Hard Times. Mistissini (Qc.): Cree Publications.
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craik, Brian. 1982. The animate in Cree language and ideology. In William Cowan (ed.), Papers of the Thirteenth Algonquian Conference, 29–36. Ottawa: Carleton University.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2009. Animacy and spatial cases. Presentation at the Workshop Cases, animacy and semantic roles . Helsinki, August 26, 2009. Available at [URL] (last access 16 October 2020).
Creissels, Denis & Cecile Mounole. 2011. Animacy and spatial cases. Typological tendencies and the case of Basque. In Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi, Jussi Ylikosk (eds.), Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles, 157–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2003, 2nd edn. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cuoq, Jean-André 1891. Grammaire de la langue algonquine. Memoires de la Société royale du Canada, ser. 1, 9(1). 85–114.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, Amy. 1995. Motivation vs. predictability in Algonquian gender. In David Pentland (ed.), Papers of the Twenty-Sixth Algonquian Conference, 52–66. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Darnell, Regna & Anthony L. Vanek. 1976. The semantic basis of the animate/inanimate distinction in Cree. Papers in Linguistics 91. 159–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 591. 59–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drapeau, Lynn. 2014. Grammaire de la langue innue. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
Frantz, Donald G. & Norma Jean Russell. 1995, 2nd edn. Blackfoot dictionary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives. 1990. Primary and secondary stem derivation in Algonquian. International Journal of American Linguistics 561. 449–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Grammatical gender in Algonquian. In H. Christoph Wolfart (ed.), Papers of the Thirty-Third Algonquian Conference, 195–231. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
. 2005. “I am a Red-Skin: The adoption of a Native American expression (1769–1826). European Review of American Studies 19(2). 1–20.Google Scholar
Goulet, Keith. 2008. Animate and inanimate: The Cree nehinuw view. In Alison K. Brown (ed.), Material histories: Proceedings of a Workshop held at Marischal Museum, University of Aberdeen, 7–19. Aberdeen: Marischal Museum.Google Scholar
Hallowell, A. Irving. 1935–36. Rocks and stones. American Philosophical Society Library. Alfred Irving Hallowell Papers, 1892–1981, Ms. Coll. 26. Unpublished typescript, written ca. 1935–36. [Reprinted In Brown, Jennifer S. H. & Susan Elaine Gray (eds.). 2010. Contributions to Ojibwe Studies: Essays, 1934–1972 / A. Irving Hallowell, 44–50. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.]Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2017. Explaining alienability contrasts in adpossessive constructions: Predictability vs. iconicity. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 36(2). 193–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewson, John. 1993. A computer-generated: Dictionary of Proto-Algonquian. Ottawa: Canadian Ethnology Service paper (no. 125). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: The MacMillan Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1966. What Algonquian is really like. International Journal of American Linguistics 1966: 59–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhn, George. 2014. Contextually conditioned allomorphy and the Basque locative: Spelling out the Basque extended nominal projection. Martin Kholberger, Kate Bellamy, Eleanor Dutton (eds), Proceedings of ConSOLE XXI, 2013, 146–170. Leiden: Leiden University Center for Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2001. An overview of Basque locational cases: Old descriptions, new approaches. International Computer Science Institute Technical Report TR-01-006.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 1979. On the animate-inanimate distinction in Cree. Anthropological Linguistics 211. 351–354.Google Scholar
Junker, Marie-Odile & Louise Blacksmith. 2013. East Cree Nouns (Southern Dialect). [Revised from 2000 original edition] In The interactive East Cree reference grammar. Available at [URL] (last access 10 October 2020).
Junker, Marie-Odile, Lucy Salt & Frances Visitor. 2013. East Cree nouns (Northern Dialect). [Revised from 2002 original edition] In The interactive East Cree reference grammar. Available at [URL] (Last access 10 October 2020).
Kilarski, Marcin. 2007. Algonquian and Indo-European gender in a historiographic perspective. Historiographica 341. 333–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lacombe, Albert. 1874. Dictionnaire de la langue des Cris. Montréal: Beauchemin.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackay, John Alexander. 1904. Otiki tetitimatot (The New Testament in Plains Cree; translated by William Mason). London: British and Foreign Bible Society.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Marguerite. 1980. Towards a dialectology of Cree-Montagnais-Naskapi. Toronto: University of Toronto Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Neeposh, Ella, Moar, Daisy, Salt, Ruth, Marguerite MacKenzie & Bill Jancewicz (eds.). 2012. Eastern James Bay Cree dictionary (Southern Dialect). Chisasibi (Quebec): Cree School Board.Google Scholar
Okimâsis, Jean L. 2004. Cree, language of the Plains. Regina: Canadian Plains Research Center.Google Scholar
Quinn, Conor. 2001. A preliminary survey of animacy categories in Penobscot. In John D. Nichols (ed.), Papers of the Thirty-Second Algonquian Conference, 395–426. Winnipeg: Presses de l’Université du Manitoba.Google Scholar
Silver, Shirley, and Wick R. Miller. 1997. American Indian languages: Cultural and social contexts. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Robert M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages, 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Straus, Anne T. & Robert Brightman. 1982. The implacable raspberry. Papers in Linguistics 151. 97–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Clinton Joliffe, & A. P. Buchner. 1975. Rock art: A metalinguistic interpretation of the Algonkian word for stone. In William Cowan (ed.), Papers of the Sixth Algonquian Conference, 362–371. Ottawa: Canadian Ethnology Service Paper No. 23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfart, H. Christoph. 1973. Plains Cree: A grammatical study (Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, new series, Vol. 631, part 5). Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
. 1996. Sketch of Cree, an Algonquian language. In Ives Goddard (ed.), Handbook of North American Indians. Vol. 17: Languages, 364–439. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
. 2020. Names and name formulae in literary Plains Cree. In Monica Macaulay & Margaret Noodin (eds.), Papers of the Forty-Ninth Algonquian Conference, 251–272. Buffalo: SUNY Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfart, H. Christoph, and Janet F. Carroll. 1981 (2nd edn.) Meet Cree: A Guide to the Cree Language. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.Google Scholar
Wolvengrey, Arok. 2001. nêhiyawêwin: itwêwina (Cree: Words). Regina, Saskatchewan: Canadian Plains Research Center. [Dictionary compiled by Arok Wolvengrey. with the assistance of the Cree Editing Council.]Google Scholar
Wolvengrey, Arok E. 2011. Semantic and pragmatic functions in Plains Cree syntax. PhD Thesis. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics, 2011.Google Scholar