Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 46:3 (2022) ► pp.559–593

Through space, relations, and thoughts

The system of postpositions in Karijona (Cariban, Amazonia)

ORCID logo | Universidad Nacional de Colombia | Université de Paris
ORCID logo | University of Warsaw
This paper aims to describe the morphosyntax and semantics of postpositions in Karijona, a Cariban language from Northwest Amazonia. The data, collected in the Karijona settlement of Puerto Nare (Colombia), were analyzed according to Basic Linguistic Theory and Cognitive Semantics. Like other Cariban languages, Karijona has a typologically unusual system of postpositions, which can cross-reference person and number, and form complex stems consisting of locative roots and locative suffixes. In terms of their semantics, the system distinguishes among spatial, relational, and ‘mental state’ postpositions. The first type encodes noun classification, orientation, and distance. While the second type has prototypical relational meanings, the third refers to cognitive and emotional states. This paper presents the first systematic description of the Karijona postpositions.
Keywords: Amazonian languages, Cariban languages, Karijona, locative classifiers, mental states, grammar of space, morphosyntax
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Typological profile of Karijona
  • 3.Previous work on postpositional systems among Cariban languages
  • 4.Karijona postpositions
    • 4.1Morphology of postpositions in Karijona
      • 4.1.1Segmentable postpositional stems
      • 4.1.2Non-segmentable postpositional stems
      • 4.1.3Status of monosyllabic postpositions in Karijona
    • 4.2Syntax of postpositional phrases in Karijona
    • 4.3Spatial postpositions
      • 4.3.1Classificatory postpositions
        • A-i. general place and the locative root ho
        • A-ii. aquatic place and the locative root ka
        • A-iii. elongated place and the locative root rana
        • A-iv. bounded place and the locative root ta
        • A-v. animate referents and the postposition ʤa
      • 4.3.2Orientational postpositions
        • B-i. behind and the locative root ga
        • B-ii. under and the locative root da, including ehɨne
        • B-iii. front and the non-segmentable waho
        • B-iv. above and the non-segmentable həkə and reto
      • 4.3.3Distantial postpositions
        • C-i. deictic sides and the non-segmentable kɨnəkə and bəbəkə
        • C-ii. the adverbial mɨha and mɨhake
    • 4.4Relational postpositions
    • 4.5Mental state postpositions
      • E-i. cognitive
      • E-ii. emotional
  • 5.Summary
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 15 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20050.gue
References (51)
References
Abbott, Miriam. 1991. Macushi. In Desmond Derbyshire & Geoffrey Pullum. (Eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. 31., 23–160. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers. A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2017. A typology of noun categorization devices. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic typology, 361–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basso, Ellen. 2012. A grammar of Kalapalo, a southern Cariban language. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa, & Pederson, Eric. 1992. Instructions for the topological relations pictures (the BowPed Project). In Stephen C. Levinson. (Ed.), Space Stimuli Kit 1.2. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Caceres, Natalia. 2011. Grammaire fonctionelle-typologique du Ye’kwana. Langue caribe du Venezuela. Lyon: Universite Lumiere Lyon 2. PhD dissertation.
Cáceres, Natalia. 2021. Asymmetries in Path expression in Ye’kwana. In Anetta Kopecka & Marine Vuillermet. (Eds.), Source and goal (a)symmetries. Studies in Language special issue 45(1) 203–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlin, Eithne. 2003. The experiencer role in the expression of mental states and activities in Trio. Amerindia 281, 161–182.Google Scholar
. 2004. A grammar of Trio. A Cariban language of Suriname. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Carijona, Lucía, Guerrero, David, Rodríguez, Andrea, & Vargas, Karina. 2015. Los Carijona: estado de arte de las investigaciones y de la documentación lingüística. Ministerio de Cultura de Colombia.Google Scholar
Courtz, Hendrik. 2008. A Carib grammar and dictionary. Toronto: Magoria Books.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond. 1979. Hixkaryana. Amsterdam: Noth-Holland.Google Scholar
. 1985. Hixkaryana and linguistic typology. Dallas: SIL.Google Scholar
. 1999. Carib. In Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald. (Eds.), The Amazonian languages, 23–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2010a. Basic linguistic theory. Vol. 21: Grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010b. Basic linguistic theory. Vol. 11: Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012. Basic linguistic theory. Vol. 31: Further grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, Jordan A. G. 2019. A formal and semantic reconstruction of Cariban postpositions. Eugene: University of Oregon BA thesis.
Franco, Roberto. 2002. Los Carijonas de Chiribiquete. Bogotá: Fundación Puerto Rastrojo.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike. 1998. On recornstructing grammar. Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
González Sánchez, Lina P. 2019. Diseño de un modelo pedagógico para la construcción de un método de enseñanza en contexto de revitalización – lengua karijona (Caribe). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia BA thesis.
Guerrero-Beltran, David F. 2016. Estructura de la oración simple en Karijona: lengua indígena de la Amazonía colombiana. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia BA thesis.
2019. The grammar of space in Karijona, a Cariban language from Northwest Amazonia. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia BA thesis.
Hagège, Claude. 2010. Adpositions. Function marking in languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Robert. 1998. Wai Wai. In Desmond Derbyshire & Geoffrey Pullum. (Eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. 41, 25–224. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hough, Karen. 2008. The expression & perception of space in Wayana. Leiden: Sidestone Press.Google Scholar
Koehn, Edward, & Koehn, Sally. 1986. Apalai. In Desmond Derbyshire & Geoffrey Pullum. (Eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages, Vol. 11, 33–127. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2001. Motion verb stimulus, version 2. In Stephen C. Levinson & Nick Enfield. (Eds.), Manual for the field season 2001, 9–13. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C., & Wilkins, David. (Eds.). 2006. Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lum, Jonathon. 2018. Frames of spatial reference in Dhivehi language and cognition. Clayton: Monash University PhD dissertation.
Meira, Sérgio. 1999. A Grammar of Tiriyó. Houston: Rice University PhD dissertation.
. 2000. A reconstruction of Proto-Taranoan: phonology and morphology. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
. 2001. Why our children don’t speak our language (unpublished transcribed text).Google Scholar
. 2004. Mental state postpositions in Tiriyo and other Cariban languages. Linguistic Typology 8(2). 213–241.Google Scholar
. 2006. Approaching Space in Tiriyo Grammar. In Stephen C. Levinson & David Wilkins. (Eds.), Grammars of space. Explorations in cognitive diversity, 311–358. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Overall, Simon E., & Wojtylak, Katarzyna I. 2018. Nominalization in Northwest Amazonia: Introduction. STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 71(1), 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Bill, Lum, Jonathon, Schlossberg, Jonathan, & Gaby, Alice. 2017. How does the environment shape spatial language? Evidence for sociotopography. Linguistic Typology 21(3), 457–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas, & Payne, Doris. 2012. Typological grammar of Panare: A Cariban language of Venezuela. Leiden: BRILL.Google Scholar
Pabón Sarmiento, David. A. 2021. Una Primera Aproximación a la Semántica y la Morfosintaxis de los Conceptos de Propiedad en la Lengua Karijona, Lengua Caribe de la Amazonía Colombiana. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia BA thesis.
Porras Feria, Sebastián. 2020. Aproximación a las actitudes lingüísticas de la comunidad carijona de Puerto Nare (Guaviare). Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia BA thesis.
Robayo Romero, Camilo. A. 1986. El verbo Carijona: Construcción sintética. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes MA thesis.
Robayo Romero, Camilo A. 1989. “En faisant une rame” texte Carijona. Amerindia 141. 189–203.Google Scholar
1997. Babel de nuevo erigida. El caso de la lengua Carijona. In Ximena Pachon, François Correa, & Elsa Benavides. (Eds.), Lenguas Amerindias. Condiciones Amerindias en Colombia, 541–585. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
2000. Avance sobre morfología Carijona. In María L. Rodríguez de Montes & María S. González de Pérez. (Eds.), Lenguas indígenas de Colombia: Una visión descriptiva, 171–180. Bogotá: Instituto Caro y Cuervo.Google Scholar
Schindler, Helmut. 1977. Etnohistoria de los Carijona en el Siglo XX. Montalban 61, 551–557.Google Scholar
Tavares, Petronila. 2005. A grammar of Wayana. Houston: Rice University PhD dissertation.
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. 11: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vega Álvarez, Paula V. 2020a. El audiolibro, un aporte a la revitalización lingüística de la lengua Karijona. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia BA thesis.
2020b. Etnografía colaborativa de la experiencia en campo con la comunidad Carijona de Puerto Nare. La Múcura Revista, 91, 12–29.Google Scholar
Wojtylak, Katarzyna I. 2018. Nominalizations in Murui (Witotoan). STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 71(1), 19–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wojtylak, Katarzyna I. 2020. A grammar of Murui (Bue), a Witotoan language from Northwest Amazonia. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar