References
Aijmer, Karin
1997 I think: An English modal particle. In Toril Swan & Olaf J. Westvik (eds), Modality in Germanic languages. Historical and comparative perspective, 1–47. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002English discourse particles : Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. & Edward Keenan
1985Deixis. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 31, 259–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco
2013Grammaticalisation with coevolution of form and meaning in East Asia? Evidence from Sinitic. Language Sciences 401. 148–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2002On the development of final though: A case of grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 345–361. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Ulrich Detges
(eds.) 2014Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter
1996Areal typology and grammaticalization: Processes of grammaticalization based on nouns and verbs in East and Mainland South East Asian languages. Studies in Language 20(3). 519–597. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Grammaticalization without coevolution of form and meaning: The case of tense-aspect in East and mainland Southeast Asia. In Bisang, Walter, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 109–138. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Problems with primary vs. secondary grammaticalization: The case of East and mainland Southeast Asian languages. Language Sciences 471. 132–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
2000Indicators and procedures: Nevertheless and but . Journal of Linguistics 36(3). 463–486. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Relevance and linguistic meaning : The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen
2015Deixis. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 52–57. Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996Pragmatic markers in English : Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008The comment clause in English : Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The development of I mean: Implications for the study of historical pragmatics. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Methods in historical pragmatics, 37–80. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth ClossTraugott
2005Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1934Sprachtheorie (Language Theory). Jena: FischerGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere D. & Pagliuca, William
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1994Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Eveline V. Clark
1977Psychology and language. An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Cooke, Joseph R.
1968Pronominal reference in Thai, Burmese, and Vietnamese (University of California Publications in Linguistics 52). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1989Thai sentence particles and other topics (Pacific Linguistics Series A, No. 80). Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies: Australian National University.Google Scholar
de Vries, Lourens
1995Demonstratives, referent identification and topicality in Wambon and some other Papuan languages. Journal of Pragmatics 241. 513–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen
2011Introduction: Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification of discourse markers. Linguistics 49(2). 287–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth & Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul
2015Grammaticalization or pragmaticalization of discourse markers? More than a terminological issue. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16(1). 59–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
1999Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17(4). 463–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Bühler’s two-field theory of pointing and naming and the deictic origins of grammatical morphemes. In Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds.), Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections, 37–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2011Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse function. Linguistics 49(2). 365–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
1991Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research. Pragmatics 1(1). 71–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J.
2003aThe definition of what-d’you-call-it: Semantics and pragmatics of recognitional deixis. Journal of Pragmatics 35(1). 101–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003bDemonstratives in space and interaction: Data from Lao speakers and implications for semantic analysis. Language 79(1). 82–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1975/1997Lectures on deixis. Stanford: CSI Publications. (Originally distributed as Fillmore (1975) Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis by the University of Indiana Linguistics Club).Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
2006Approaches to discourse particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. & Robert D. Van Valin Jr.
1984Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E.
1993Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Speaking conditionally: Some contexts for if-clauses in conversation. In Angeliki Athanasiadou & René Dirven (eds.), On conditionals again, 387–413. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frank-Job, Barbara
2006A Dynamic–Interactional approach to discourse markers. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to discourse particles, 395–413. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1982Logic vs. pragmatics, with human language as the referee: Toward an empirically viable epistemology. Journal of pragmatics 6(2). 81–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Mary
1964Thai-English student’s dictionary. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1978Conditionals are topics. Language 541. 565–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael & Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hancil, Sylvie, ‎Alexander Haselow & ‎Margje Post
(eds) 2015Final particles. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, William F.
1992The indexical ground of deictic reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000Indexicality. Jounral of Linguistic Anthropology 9(1–2). 124–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto & Kyung-eun Yoon
2006A cross-linguistic exploration of demonstratives in interaction: with particular reference to the context of word-formulation trouble. Studies in Language 30(3). 485–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1980Nunggubuyu deixis, anaphora, and culture. Chicago Linguistics Society: Parasession on pronouns and anaphora, 151–165.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on Grammaticalization, 83–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6). 1205–1247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck & Tania Kuteva
2013An outline of discourse grammar. In Shannon T. Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds.), Functional approaches to language, 155–206. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Mechthild Reh
1984Grammaticalization and reanalysis in African languages. Hamburg: Buske Helmet Verlag.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
1996Demonstratives in narrative discourse: A taxonomy of universal uses. Studies in anaphora. Amsterdam: John Bebjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishiyama, Osamu
2019Diachrony of personal pronouns in Japanese: A functional and cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2008Bipolar distribution of a word and grammaticalization in Thai: A discourse perspective. In Anthony V. N. Diller, Jerold A. Edmondson & Yongxian Luo (eds.), The Tai-Kadai languages, 468–483. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2013Japanese, Rev. edn. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015A multiple-grammar model of speakers’ linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Linguistics 26(2). 161–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming). Stance triangle and double dialogicality. Text and Talk Special Issue.
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Preeya Ingkaphirom
2000Creating speech register in Thai conversation. Language in Society 29(4). 519–554. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, & Preeya Ingkaphirom
2005A reference grammar of Thai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva
2011On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4). 852–897. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
2020Beyond exophoric and endophoric uses. Additional discourse functions of demonstratives. In Åshild Naess, Anna Margetts & Yvonne Treis (eds.), Demonstratives in discourse, 21–42. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1973The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Diana M.
2011A discourse-constructional approach to the emergence of discourse markers in English. Linguistics 49(2). 415–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles
1976Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Linde, Charlotte
1979Focus of attention and the choice of pronouns in discourse. Syntax and Semantics 121. 337–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Minami, Fujio
1974Gendai Nihongo no Koozoo (The structure of modern Japanese). Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Mithun, Mrianne
1987The grammatical nature and discourse power of demonstratives. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS 13 1987), 184–194. Available at: https://​journals​.linguisticsociety​.org​/proceedings​/index​.php​/BLS​/article​/view​/1824​/1596 (last access 17 October 2021). Crossref
Naess, Åshild, Anna Margetts & Yvonne Treis
(eds.) 2020Demonstratives in discourse. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Palakornkul, Angkab
1972A socio-linguistic study of pronominal strategy in spoken Bangkok Thai. Austin: University of Texas at Austin PhD dissertation.
Prince, Ellen
1980Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–256. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ridge, Eleanor
2020Morphosyntactic and functional asymmetries in Vatlongos discourse demonstratives. In Åshild Naess, Anna Margetts & Yvonne Treis (eds.), Demonstratives in discourse, 69–101. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Sakita, Tomoko I.
2013Discourse markers as stance markers: Well in stance alignment in conversational interaction. Pragmatics & cognition 21(1). 81–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, Vol. 11, 54–75. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sidner, Candace L.
1983Focusing in the comprehension of definite anaphora. Computational Models of discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singnoi Unchalee
2001Discourse functions of Thai demonstratives: A case on pragmatically controlled irregular functions. In Papers from the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (SEALS XI), 645–657.Google Scholar
Tabor, Whitney & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
1998Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), The limits of grammaticalization, 229–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Takubo, Yukinori & Satoshi Kinsui
1997Discourse management in terms of mental spaces. Journal of Pragmatics 28(6). 741–758. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
1995Joint attention as social cognition. In Chris Moore & Philip J. Dunham (eds.), Joint Attention: Its origin and role in development, 103–130. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
1999/2009The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2008Reference: Intending that others jointly attend. Pragmatics and Cognition 6(1–2). 229–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1995The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the ICHL XII, Manchester. Version of 11/97. Available at http://​www​.stanford​.edu​/~traugott​/ect​-papersonline​.html (last access 17 October 2021).
2012Intersubjectification and clause periphery. English Text Construction 5(1). 7–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittayapanyanon (Saito), Sunisa
2017Study of pragmatic final particles in “Corpus data on spoken Thai”. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 941. 111–136. Available at http://​202​.13​.5​.192​/bitstream​/10108​/90284​/1​/jaas094003​_ful​.pdf (last access 17 October 2021).