Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 21:2 (1997) ► pp.461–467
Book review

Robert de Dardel. A la recherche du protoroman [Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, 275]. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1996. xvii + 182 pp.

Reviewed by
| University of Liverpool
Published online: 1 January 1997
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.21.2.14wri
References (14)
References
Banniard, Michel. 1989. Genèse culturelle de l’Europe (Ve  – Ville siècle). Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
. 1993. “Latin tardif et français prélitteraire”. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 881:139–62.Google Scholar
De Dardel, Robert. 1987. “Limites et possibilités de la reconstruction syntaxique”. Lingvisticae Investigationes 111:337–56.Google Scholar
. 1989. “L’hypothèse d’une base OVS en protoroman”, Probus 11:121–43.Google Scholar
De Dardel, Robert and Wüest, Jakob. 1993. “Les systèmes casuels du protoroman. Les deux cycles de simplification”, Vox Romanica 521:25–65.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A. (Jr.). 1976. Proto-Romance phonology. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
). 1983. Proto-Romance morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. 1991/1996. “Evidence for SVO in Latin?” In: Wright, R. (ed.), 69–82.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 1987. Archaeology and language. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Seidl, Christian. 1995. “Le système casuel des protoromans ibérique et sarde: combien de cas contenait-il?”. In Callebat, L. (ed.), Latin vulgaire  – latin tardif IV, Hildesheim: Olms-Wiedmann, 93–102.Google Scholar
Wanner, Dieter. 1987. The development of Romance clitic pronouns: from Latin to Old Romance. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wright, Roger. 1982. Late Latin and Early Romance. Liverpool: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar
. 1995. Early Ibero-Romance. Newark, Delaware: Juan de la Cuesta.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1991/1996. Latin and the Romance languages in the Early Middle Ages. London: Routledge; paperback reprint, Pennsylvania: Penn State Press.Google Scholar