Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 21:3 (1997) ► pp.655667
References (14)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1995. “Morphological Case: no need for functional projections in German”. Yearbook Groningen.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans den. 1983. “On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules”. In: On the formal syntax of the Westgermania Abraham, W. (ed.), 47–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1989. “Some notes on economy and derivation”. In: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 101; also appears as chapter 2 in Chomsky. (1995).Google Scholar
. 1992. “A minimalist program for linguistic theory”. In: MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 11; also appear as chapter 3 in Chomsky. (1995).Google Scholar
. 1995. “Categories and transformations”, chapter 4 in The minimalist program, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 1993. The rise of functional categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van. 1987. Syntactic Case and morphological Case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1994. “The rise of positional licensing in Germanic”, talk Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda and Sportiche, Dominique. 1991. “The position of subjects”. Lingua 851:211–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Crister. 1994. “Small pro, weak AGR and syntactic differences in Scandinavian”, Paper read at the 9th Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop, Cambridge, Mass.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. “Speculations on verb-second”. In: Mascaro, J. and Nespor, M. (eds), Grammar in progress, 375–385. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, H. 1996. “On the (non)-universality of functional categories”, to appear in: Abraham, Werner et al. (eds), Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist framework. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar