Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 46:4 (2022) ► pp. 753792
Ackerman, Farrell, James P. Blevins & Robert Malouf
2009Parts and wholes: Patterns of relatedness in complex morphological systems and why they matter. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds.), Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition, 54–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Farrell & Robert Malouf
2013Morphological organization: The low conditional entropy conjecture. Language 891. 429–464. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Albright, Adam C. & Bruce P. Hayes
2003Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition 901. 119–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1994Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge: MIT press.Google Scholar
Beniamine, Sacha
2018Classifications flexionnelles. Étude quantitative des structures de paradigmes. Paris: Université Sorbonne Paris Cité-Université Paris Diderot PhD dissertation.
Beniamine, Sacha, Olivier Bonami & Benoît Sagot
2017Inferring inflection classes with description length. Journal of Language Modelling 5(3). 465–525.Google Scholar
Blevins, James P.
2016Word and paradigm morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & S. Beniamine
2016Joint predictiveness in inflectional paradigms. Word Structure 9(2). 156–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Gilles Boyé
2006Deriving inflectional irregularity. In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Varna, 361–380. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. http://​cslipublications​.stanford​.edu​/HPSG​/2006​/bonami​-boye​.pdf
2014De formes en thèmes. In Florence Villoing, Sarah Leroy & Sophie David (eds.), Foisonnements morphologiques. Études en hommage à Françoise Kerleroux, 17–45. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris-Ouest.Google Scholar
Boyé, Gilles & Gauvain Schalchli
2019Realistic data and paradigms: The paradigm cell finding problem. Morphology 291. 199–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Dunstan, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett
2013Canonical morphology and syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Dunstan & Andrew Hippisley
2012Network morphology: A defaults based theory of word structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Budassi, Marco & Eleonora Litta
2017In trouble with the rules. Theoretical issues raised by the insertion of -sc-verbs into Word Formation Latin. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Resources and Tools for Derivational Morphology (DeriMo), 15–26.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1995Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5). 425–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
2005The canonical approach in typology. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds.), Linguistic diversity and language theories, 25–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Canonical inflectional classes. In Fabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé & Jesse Tseng (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Décembrettes: Morphology in Bordeaux, 1–11. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Delatte, Louis, Étienne Evrard, Suzanne Govaerts & Joseph Denooz
1981Dictionnaire fréquentiel et index inverse de la langue latine. Liège: LASLA.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U.
2002Latin inflection classes. In A. Machtelt Bolkestein, Caroline H. M. Kroon, Harm Pinkster, H. Wim Remmelink & Rodie Risselada (eds.), Theory and description in Latin linguistics, 91–110. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Friedman, Jerome H.
2001Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of statistics, 1189–1232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guzmán Naranjo, Matías
2019Analogical classification in formal grammar. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
2020Analogy, complexity and predictability in the Russian nominal inflection system. Morphology 30(3). 219–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guzmán Naranjo, Matías & Olivier Bonami
2021Overabundance and inflectional classification: quantitative evidence from Czech. Glossa 61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Litta, Eleonora & Marco Passarotti
2020(When) inflection needs derivation: A word formation lexicon for Latin. In Nigel Holmes, Marijke Ottink, Josine Schrickx & Maria Selig (eds.), Lemmata Linguistica Latina. Vol. 11: Words and Sounds, 224–239. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Malouf, Robert
2017Abstractive morphological learning with a recurrent neural network. Morphology 27(4). 431–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Llew, Jonathan Baxter, Peter L. Bartlett & Marcus R. Frean
2000Boosting algorithms as gradient descent. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 512–518.Google Scholar
McGillivray, Barbara & Adam Kilgarriff
2013Tools for historical corpus research, and a corpus of Latin. New Methods in Historical Corpus Linguistics (3). 247–257.Google Scholar
Passarotti, Marco, Marco Budassi, Eleonora Litta & Paolo Ruffolo
2017The Lemlat 3.0 package for morphological analysis of Latin. In Gerlof Bouma & Yvonne Adesam (eds.), Proceedings of the NoDaLiDa 2017 Workshop on Processing Historical Language, 24–31. Gothenburg: Linköping University Electronic Press.Google Scholar
Pedregosa, Fabian, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, Jake Vanderplas, Alexandre Passos, David Cournapeau, Matthieu Brucher, Matthieu Perrot & Édouard Duchesnay
2011Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 121. 2825–2830.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, Matteo
2020Predictability in Latin inflection. An entropy-based approach. Bergamo/Pavia: Università di Bergamo-Università di Pavia PhD dissertation.
2021Patterns of interpredictability and principal parts in Latin verb paradigms: An entropy-based approach. Journal of Latin Linguistics 19(2). 195–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, Matteo & Marco Passarotti
2018LatInfLexi: An inflected lexicon of Latin verbs. In Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it 2018). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet
2001Stochastic phonology. Glot International 5(6). 195–207.Google Scholar
Plaster, Keith, Maria Polinsky & Boris Harizanov
2013Noun classes grow on trees. In Balthasar Bickel, Lenore A. Grenoble, David A. Peterson & Alan Timberlake (eds.), Language typology and historical contingency: In honor of Johanna Nichols, 153–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sims, Andrea
2015Inflectional defectiveness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.
2001Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Inflection classes. In Matthew Baerman (ed.), The Oxford handbook of inflection, 113–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. & Raphael A. Finkel
2013Morphological typology: From word to paradigm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar