Cover not available
Article published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 46:4 (2022) ► pp.872–900

From syntax to morphology

Noun-incorporation in Chinese

ORCID logo | Central China Normal University

Noun-incorporation is a process of word-formation in which a nominal constituent is added to a verbal root, with the resulting construction being both a verb and a single word. The incorporated element may be the object of the verbal element; it may also denote agent, instrument, location, etc. Once incorporated the nominal constituent figures less prominently. The meaning of the resulting new word is more than the sum of its two constituents. This is the most nearly syntactic of all morphological processes that has morphological, semantic, syntactic, and discourse consequences (Mithun 1984: 847). By reference to relevant typological studies, this article describes the morphological, syntactic, and semantic features of noun-incorporation in Chinese within the framework of Systemic Functional Linguistics. It is found that the new verb may be intransitive or transitive and the two elements may occur continuously or discontinuously and they may swap their positions. This process may shed light on the complementary and continuous relation between lexis and grammar and the ergative nature of Chinese.

Keywords: noun-incorporation, verbs, transitivity, ergativity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.NI from a typology perspective
  • 3.NI in Chinese
    • 3.1The two types of NI in Chinese
      • 3.1.1Type I: Intransitive
      • 3.1.2Type II: Transitive
    • 3.2Structural features
  • 4.Semantic features and lexicalization
    • 4.1Semantic relation: Before and after incorporation
    • 4.2Lexicalization
  • 5.Syntactic and discourse consequences
    • 5.1Transitivity
    • 5.2Textual function
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 14 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.21015.wan
References (45)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra. Y.
2007 Typological distinctions in word-formation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd edn. Vol. III1: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 1–65. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark
1988 Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beck, David
2017 The typology of morphological processes. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic typology, 325–360. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren
1968/2004 A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin
1992 Transitivity/ergativity: The Janus-headed grammar of actions and events. In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 105–135. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1998 On transitivity and ergativity in English, or on the need for dialogue between schools. In Johan van der Auwera, Frank Durieux, & Ludo Lejeune (eds.), English as human language: To honour Louis Goossens, 3–26. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1979 Ergativity. Language 55(1). 59–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas
1997 Role or cast? Noun incorporation and complex predicates in Mayali. In Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan, & Peter Sells (eds.), Complex predicates, 397–430. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1971 Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist’s field trip. Papers from the 7th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 394–415. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1961 Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 171. 241–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1968 Notes on transitivity and theme in English (Part 3). Journal of Linguistics 4(2). 179–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985 An introduction to Functional Grammar, 1st edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1994 An introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
2004 An introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn. Revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & C. M. I. M. Matthiessen
1999 Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
2008 Complementarities in language. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
2014 Halliday’s introduction of Functional Grammar (4th edn., revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen.). New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1987 The grammarian’s dream: Lexis as most delicate grammar. In M. A. K. Halliday & R. P. Fawcett (eds.). New developments in systemic linguistics. Vol. I: Theory and description, 185–211. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson
1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2). 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johns, Alana
2017 Noun incorporation. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, 1–27. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
1981 Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1984 The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 601. 847–894. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986 On the nature of noun incorporation, Language 621. 32–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muro, Alessio
2009 Noun Incorporation: A theoretical approach. Padova: Università degli Studi di Padova PhD dissertation.
Packard, Jerome Lee
2003 The morphology of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans
(ed.) 1979 Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold
1980 Noun incorporation in West Greenlandic: A case of syntactic word formation. Language 561. 300–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986 Some notes on noun incorporation. Language 621. 19–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1911 The problem of noun incorporation in American languages. American Anthropologist 131. 250–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shopen, Timothy
(ed.) 2007 Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd edn. Vol. III1: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yule, George
2000 The study of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
董秀芳 (Dong, Xiufang
) 2011, 《词汇化：汉语双音词的衍生和发展》。 北京: 商务印书馆。Google Scholar
) 2016, 《汉语的词库和语法》。 北京： 北京大学出版社。Google Scholar
冯胜利 (Feng, Shengli
) 1997, 《汉语的韵律、词法与句法》。 北京： 北京大学出版社。Google Scholar
凌德祥 (Ling, Dexiang
) 1999, 试论双音节动宾式动词带宾语的基本规律, 《汉语学习》 1999(5): 9–13.Google Scholar
吕叔湘 (Lü, Shuxiang
) 1963, 现代汉语单双音节问题初探,《中国语文》 1963(1), 10–22。Google Scholar
) 1979, 《汉语语法分析问题》。 北京： 商务印书馆。Google Scholar
饶长溶 (Rao, Changrong
) 1985, 动宾组合带宾语,《语法研究和探索》 （三）。 北京： 北京大学出版社。Google Scholar
邢公婉 (Xing, Gongwan
) 1997, 一种似乎要流行开来的可疑句式—动宾式动词+宾语,《语文建设》 1997(4)：21–23。Google Scholar
张博 (Zhang, Bo
) 1999, “动宾结构+ 宾语” 的条件及发展趋势,《古汉语研究》 1999(3), 2–6。Google Scholar
朱德熙 (Zhu, Dexi
) 1982, 《语法讲义》, 北京： 商务印书馆。Google Scholar
) 1985, 《语法答问》, 北京： 商务印书馆。Google Scholar
朱军、 盛新华 (Zhu, Jun & Sheng, Xinhua
) 2008, “动宾结构带宾语”格式成因探究,《汉语学习》 2008(3), 37–42。Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by 2 other publications

Huang, Huade
2023. Reduplication in Kua’nsi. Languages 8:2 ► pp. 130 ff. DOI logo
Maeng, Junghwan
2023. Lexicon over Syntax: L2 Structural Processing of Chinese Separable Verbs. Languages 8:3 ► pp. 192 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.