Part of
Studies in LanguageVol. 22:1 (1998) ► pp.161–204
Miscellaneous
On Experiential Sentences
In the study of the syntactic category EXPERIENTIAL, it has been known that the experiential is mainly concerned with indefinite (or nonspecific) situations. However, a comparative study of the experiential in Chinese, Japanese and Korean reveals that there exists another type of experiential which is concerned with definite (or specific) situations. All three languages share the semantic properties of repeatability, uniqueness, discontinuity and relevant duration for the experiential. The distinction between the indefinite and definite experiential is supported by syntactic as well as semantic evidence.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Gerner, M.
2012. Predicate-Induced Permutation Groups. Journal of Semantics 29:1 ► pp. 109 ff. 
Gerner, Matthias
2004. Occurrence particles in the Yi group and their interaction with the occurrence type of a situation. Lingua 114:11 ► pp. 1331 ff.
Oh, Sun-Young
2003. The Korean verbal suffix -ess-: a diachronic account of its multiple uses. Journal of Pragmatics 35:8 ► pp. 1181 ff.
Pan, H. & P. Lee
2004. The role of pragmatics in interpreting the chinese perfective markers -guo and -le. Journal of Pragmatics 36:3 ► pp. 441 ff.
Rodríguez Louro, Celeste
2016. Indefinite past reference and the Present Perfect in Argentinian Spanish. Studies in Language 40:3 ► pp. 622 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.