Article published In:
Studies in Language: Online-First ArticlesThe action reference construction in Mandarin Chinese and typology of lexical flexibility
The parts of speech system and lexical flexibility in Mandarin Chinese (henceforth Chinese) has long been subjects
of debate due to the pervasive zero coding of action reference constructions. In this article, we analyze properties of the
Chinese Action Reference Construction from the perspective of Radical Construction Grammar (Croft 2001, 2022), focusing on its structural coding, behavioral potential,
productivity, and semantic shifts. We also discuss typological features that potentially reinforce lexical flexibility in Chinese,
and the implications that the language-specific properties of Chinese present for cross-linguistic discussions of parts of speech.
Specifically, reference, instead of predication, is the most flexible information-packaging function in Chinese, challenging the
privileged status of predication established in previous studies on parts of speech and lexical flexibility.
Keywords: Mandarin Chinese, parts of speech, lexical flexibility, construction grammar, nominalization
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Methodology
- 2.1Theoretical framework
- 2.2Data collection
- 3.Action reference construction in Chinese
- 3.1Two subconstructions of action reference construction
- 3.2Structural coding and behavioral potential
- 3.3Productivity and semantic shift
- 4.Typological features strengthening lexical flexibility in Chinese
- 4.1Encoding of arguments in action reference constructions
- 4.2Lack of inflectional morphological changes
- 4.3Identifiability of a topic and referring phrase
- 5.Implications for typology of lexical flexibility
- 6.Conclusions
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References
References (66)
Anderson, Stephen R. & Edward L. Keenan. 1985. Deixis. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language
typology and syntactic
description, Volume 31: Grammatical categories and
the
lexicon, 259–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beck, David. 2013. Unidirectional
flexibility and the noun-verb distinction in Lushootseed. In Jan Rijkhoff & Eva van Lier (eds.), Flexible
word classes: Typological studies of underspecified parts of
speech, 185–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bisang, Walter. 2008. Precategoriality
and syntax-based parts of speech: The case of Late Archaic Chinese. Studies in
Language 32(3). 568–589. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2013. Word
class systems between flexibility and rigidity: an integrative
approach. In Jan Rijkhoff & Eva van Lier (eds.), Flexible
word classes: Typological studies of underspecified parts of
speech, 275–303. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chappell, Hilary. 2008. Variation
in the grammaticalization of complementizers from verba dicendi in Sinitic
languages. Linguistic
Typology 12(1), 45–98. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard & Sandra A. Thompson. 1985. Lexical
nominalization. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language
typology and syntactic description. Volume 3: Grammatical categories and the
lexicon, 349–398. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic
categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of
information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2001. Radical
construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological
perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2016. Comparative
concepts and language-specific categories: Theory and practice. Linguistic
Typology 20(2), 377–393. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2023. Word
classes in Radical Construction Grammar. In Eva van Lier (ed.), The
Oxford handbook of word classes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: [URL] (last
access Oct 31 2023). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
. 2022. Morphosyntax:
constructions of the world’s
languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William & Eva van Lier. 2012. Language
universals without universal categories. Theoretical
Linguistics 38(1–2). 57–72.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davidson, Matthew. 2002. Studies
in Southern Wakashan (Nootkan)
grammar. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo PhD dissertation.
Evans, Nicholas & Toshiki Osada. 2005. Mundari:
The myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic
Typology 91. 351–390.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fang, Mei. 2006. Grammaticalization of shuō (say) in Beijing Mandarin: From lexical verb to
subordinator (北京话里《说》的语法化—从言説动词到从句标记). Chinese Journal of
Dialects (中国方言学报) 11. 107–121.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fu, Jingqi. 1994. On
deriving Chinese derived nominals: evidence for V-to-N
raising. Amherst: University of Massachusetts PhD dissertation.
Givón, T.. 1984. Syntax:
A functional-typological
introduction, Volumn 11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gong, Liwei & Satoshi Uehara. 2023. Encoding
of nominal predication constructions: a typological investigation in verb-initial
languages. Linguistic Typology Online Available
at:
(Last
access Nov 27 2023).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Pre-established
categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic
Typology 11(1), 119–132. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2012a. Escaping
ethnocentrism in the study of word-class universals. Theoretical
Linguistics 38(1–2). 91–102.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2012b. How
to compare major word-classes across the world’s languages. In Thomas Graf, Denis Paperno, Anna Szabolcsi & Jos Tellings (eds.), Theories
of everything: In honor of Edward Keenan. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 171. 109–130.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Non-verbal
predication: Theory, typology, diachrony. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2013. Parts-of-speech
systems as a basic typological determinant. In Jan Rijkhoff & Eva van Lier (eds.), Flexible
word classes: Typological studies of underspecified parts of
speech, 31–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hengeveld, Kees, Jan Rijkhoff & Anna Siewierska. 2004. Parts-of-speech
systems and word order. Journal of
Linguistics 40(3). 527–570. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hengeveld, Kees & Marieke Valstar. 2010. Parts-of-speech
systems and lexical subclasses. Linguistics in
Amsterdam 3(1). 1–24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hess, Thomas M. 1995. Lushootseed Reader with Introductory
Grammar. Volume 1: Four stories from Edward Sam. University of Montana Occasional Papers in
Linguistics 11. Missoula, MT: University of Montana.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
2006. Lushootseed
Reader. Volume 3: Four more stories from Martha Lamont. University of Montana Occasional Papers in
Linguistics 19. Missoula, MT: University of Montana.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2005. Tagalog. In Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.), The
Austronesian languages of Asia and
Madagascar, 350–376. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
2008. Lexical categories and voice in
Tagalog. In Peter Kenneth Austin & Simon Musgrave (eds.), Voice
and grammatical functions in Austronesian
languages, 247–293. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, Chu-Ren & Dingxu Shi. 2016. A
reference grammar of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, Shi-Zhe, Jing Jin & Dingxu Shi. 2016. Adjectives
and adjective phrases. In Chu-Ren Huang & Dingxu Shi (eds.), A
reference grammar of
Chinese, 276–296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C. T. James. 1989. Pro-drop in Chinese: A
generalized control theory. In Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds.), The
null subject
parameter, 185–214. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social
Sciences. 2020. Xinhua
Dictionary (新华字典), 12th
edn. Beijing: The Commercial Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Preeya Ingkaphirom. 2005. A
reference grammar of Thai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaufman, Daniel. 2009. Austronesian
Nominalism and its consequences: A Tagalog case study. Theoretical
Linguistics 35(1), 1–49. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar.
Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Launey, Michel. 2004. The
features of omnipredicativity in Classical Nahuatl. STUF – Language Typology and
Universals 57(1). 49–69.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin
Chinese: A functional reference
grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej L. 2004. Nominalization / verbalization:
Constraining a typology of transcategorial
operations. Muenchen: Lincom.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mosel, Ulrike & Even Hovdhaugen. 1992. Samoan
reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language
typology and syntactic description. Volume 2: Complex
constructions, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schachter, Paul & Fe T. Otanes. 1983. Tagalog
reference grammar. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
. 2017. Nouns
and verbs: evolution of grammatical forms. In Peng Gang & Wang Feng (eds.), New
horizons in evolutionary linguistics (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series
27), 222–253. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 2018. Nominalization
in crosslinguistic perspective. In Prashant Pardeshi & Taro Kageyama (eds.), Handbook
of Japanese contrastive
linguistics, 345–410. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sneddon, James Neil, Alexander Adelaar, Dwi Noverini Djenar & Michael C. Ewing. 2012. Indonesian
reference grammar, 2nd
edn. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vapnarsky, Valentina. 2013. Is
Yucatec Maya an omnipredicative language? Predication, the copula and focus
constructions. STUF – Language Typology and
Universals 66(1). 40–86. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wu, Chang’an. 2012. The historical formation of the blending pattern of nouns and verbs in
Chinese (汉语名词、动词交融模式的历史形成). Studies of the Chinese language (中国语文) 11. 17–28.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xun, Endong, Gaoqi Rao, Xiaoyue Xiao & Jiaojiao Zang. 2016. The construction of the BCC Corpus in the age of Big Data (大数据背景下BCC语料库的研制). Corpus
Linguistics (语料库语言学) 3(1). 93–118.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yeh, Hsin-hung. 2020. Chinese
verb phrases: Continuum of patterns with different lexical
statuses. Stanford: Stanford University PhD dissertation.
Yin, Hui. 2010. The
so-called Chinese VV compounds: A continuum between lexicon and
syntax. In Melinda Heijl (eds.), Proceedings
of the 2010 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Available
at: [URL] (Last access 26 January 2024).