Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 24:1 (2000) ► pp.204221
References (28)
References
Comrie, Bernard; and Smith, Norval. 1977. “Questionnaire”. Lingua 42/1: 1–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demircan, Ömer. 1987. “Emphatic reduplication in Turkish”. In: Boeschoten, H.; and Verhoeven, L. (eds), Studies in Modern Turkish: proceedings of the 3rd conference on Turkish 24–41. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Hatibolu, Vecihe. 1973. Pekiştirme ve kurallarn. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon; and Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1995. “Level ordering and economy in the lexical phonology of Turkish”. Language 71/4: 763–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itô, Junko. 1990. “Prosodic minimality in Japanese”. In: Ziolkowski, Michael; Noske, Manuela; et al. (eds), Papers from the twenty-sixth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Volume 2: the parasession on the syllable in phonetics and phonology 213–39. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko and Hankamer, Jorge. 1989. “Notes on monosyllabism in Turkish”. In: Itô, Junko; and Runner, Jeff (eds.), Phonology at Santa Cruz 61–69. Santa Cruz: Linguistics Research Center, University of California.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen. 1986. “Locating Turkish devoicing”. In: Dalrymple, Mary; Goldberg, Jeffrey; Hanson, Kristin; Inman, Michael; Piñon, Chris; and Wechsler, Stephen (eds), Proceedings of the Fifth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 119–128. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. “Lexical morphology and phonology”. In: I. -S. Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B. 1961. The phonology of Modern Standard Turkish. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey. 1967. Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1973. The grammar of Lahu. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John and Prince, Alan. 1993. “Prosodic morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction”. To be published by MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mester, Armin. 1994. “The quantitative trochee in Latin”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 121: 1–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1984. “The evolution of noun incorporation”. Language 60/4: 847–894. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. “On the nature of noun incorporation”. Language 62/1: 32–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. 1982. Lexical phonology. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
1986. The theory of lexical phonology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1998. “Cyclic and noncyclic phonological effects in a declarative grammar”. Booij, G.; and van Marle, J. (eds), Yearbook of morphology 1997: 179–218. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Sezer, Engin. 1981. “The k/0 alternation in Turkish”. In Clements, George N. (ed.), Harvard studies in phonology 354–382. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 1990. “Predicting rule domains in the phrasal phonology”. In: Inkelas, Sharon; and Zec, Draga (eds), The phonology-syntax connection 289–312. Chicago: CSLI Publications and the University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1989. A grammar of Slave. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1986 .”Some notes on noun incorporation”. Language 62/1: 19–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szpyra, Jolanta. 1989. The phonology-morphology interface: cycles, levels, and words. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Underhill, Robert. 1976. Turkish Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vaux, Bert. 1997. The phonology of Armenian. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1998. “Identity avoidance in phonology and morphology”. Lapointe, S. G.; Brentari, D. K.; and Farrell, P. M. (eds), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax 216–246. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Karl; and Abbott, Barbara. 1978. “The k/0 alternation in Turkish: some experimental evidence for its productivity”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 71: 35–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zoll, Cheryl. 1994. Parsing below the segment in a constraint based framework. Doctoral dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar