Article published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 24:3 (2000) ► pp.611–682
When subjects behave like objects
An analysis of the merging of S and O in Sentence-Focus Constructions across languages
This paper is concerned with the cross-linguistic expression of a universal information-structure category called the ‘thetic’ or ‘sentence-focus’ (SF) category. The SF category differs from the unmarked ‘predicate-focus’ (PF) or ‘categorical’ category by the absence of a topic-comment relation between the subject and the predicate and it differs from the marked ‘argument-focus’ (AF) category by the absence of a focus-presupposition relation between an argument and an open proposition. The theoretical issue explored here is the question of the relationship between the form and the function of SF constructions, i.e. the question of motivation in grammar. I argue that the form of SF constructions is motivated by the need to distinguish them minimally from corresponding PF constructions. The form and interpretation of a given SF sentence is thus determined not only by the syntagmatic relations among its constituents but also by the paradigmatic relation between the SF sentence as a whole and the corresponding PF sentence, i.e. in terms of a systemic opposition. Since the distinctive property of SF sentences is the absence of a topic-comment relation between the subject and the predicate, SF marking entails the marking of the subject as a non-topic. I show that across languages this non-topic marking of SF subjects tends to be done via those morphosyntactic, prosodic, or behavioral features which are normally associated with the focal objects of PF constructions.
The analysis confirms the necessity to treat the pragmatic relations topic and focus on a par with the grammatical relations subject and object and the semantic roles agent and patient. In seeking to explain the form-function fit in SF constructions in terms of the structuralist notion of paradigmatic opposition the analysis challenges both functional and formal generative approaches to grammar.
Cited by
Cited by 97 other publications
Abeillé, Anne, Barbara Hemforth, Elodie Winckel & Edward Gibson
2020. Extraction from subjects: Differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction. Cognition 204 ► pp. 104293 ff. 
Abraham, Werner
2020. From philosophical logic to linguistics. In Thetics and Categoricals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 262], ► pp. 226 ff.
Achard, Michel
2009. The distribution of French intransitive predicates. Linguistics 47:3
Auer, Peter & Yael Maschler
2013. Discourse or grammar? VS patterns in spoken Hebrew and spoken German narratives. Language Sciences 37 ► pp. 147 ff.
Bahrami, Fatemeh & Vali Rezai
2014. Information Structure and Direct Object Indexation in Persian. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4:3
Bartlett, Tom
2023. Chapter 3. Atopicality as the unmarked logical structure in Scottish Gaelic. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 71 ff.
Becker, Israela
Becker, Laura & Gertrud Schneider-Blum
2020. Morphological marking of contrast in Tima. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5:1
Belligh, Thomas
2018. The role of referential givenness in Dutch alternating presentational constructions. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32 ► pp. 21 ff.
Belligh, Thomas
2020. Are theticity and sentence-focus encoded grammatical categories of Dutch?. In Thetics and Categoricals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 262], ► pp. 34 ff.
Belligh, Thomas
2020. Dutch thetic and sentence-focus constructions on the semantics-pragmatics interface. Studies in Language 44:4 ► pp. 831 ff.
Belligh, Thomas & Claudia Crocco
2022. Theticity and sentence-focus in Italian: grammatically encoded categories or categories of language use?. Linguistics 60:4 ► pp. 1241 ff.
Belligh, Thomas, Ludovic De Cuypere & Claudia Crocco
2023. Alternating Italian thetic and sentence-focus constructions. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 58:2 ► pp. 246 ff.
Bentley, Delia
2004. Definiteness effects: evidence from Sardinian. Transactions of the Philological Society 102:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Bentley, Delia
2018. Grammaticalization of subject agreement on evidence from Italo–Romance. Linguistics 56:6 ► pp. 1245 ff.
Bentley, Delia & Silvio Cruschina
2018. The silent argument of broad focus: Typology and predictions. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1
Bevacqua, Luca & Tatjana Scheffler
2020. Form variation of pronominal it-clefts in written English. Linguistics Vanguard 6:1
Booth, Hannah
2021. Revisiting the configurationality issue in Old Icelandic. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1
Carlier, Anne & Karen Lahousse
2023. Chapter 5. Presentational clefts, existentials and information structure. In Existential Constructions across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 76], ► pp. 139 ff.
CHAVES, RUI P. & JERUEN E. DERY
2019. Frequency effects in Subject Islands. Journal of Linguistics 55:3 ► pp. 475 ff.
Chisung Oh
2009. -Un/Nun as an Unratified Topic Marker in Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics 34:3 ► pp. 603 ff.
Cho, Jacee & Roumyana Slabakova
2014. Interpreting definiteness in a second language without articles: The case of L2 Russian. Second Language Research 30:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Coghill, Eleanor
2018. Chapter 11. Information structure in the Neo-Aramaic dialect of Telkepe. In Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series, 199], ► pp. 297 ff.
Creissels, Denis, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2018. La typologie générale des constructions impersonnelles et les constructions impersonnelles du français. SHS Web of Conferences 46 ► pp. 15001 ff.
Cruschina, Silvio
DATTNER, Elitzur & Dorit RAVID
2023. The development of Hebrew zero and pronominal subject realization in the context of first and second person. Journal of Child Language ► pp. 1 ff.
De Cia, Simone & Mariangela Cerullo
2024. Towards a Typology of Zero Aboutness: Expletive A in Fornese and Chiru in Cilentano. Languages 9:2 ► pp. 60 ff.
Duffield, Cecily Jill & Laura A. Michaelis
2011. Why subject relatives prevail: Constraints versus constructional licensing. Language and Cognition 3:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
Eshel, Orit
2017. Sin Í an Cheist a Chuireas Orm Féin: Modern Irish Presentative Constructions. Studia Celtica Posnaniensia 2:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Fekete, Gabriella
2018. Topique et focus dans le discours en hongrois. La linguistique Vol. 54:2 ► pp. 165 ff.
Francez, Itamar
2009. Existentials, predication, and modification. Linguistics and Philosophy 32:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Gaeta, Livio
2023. Chapter 4. Pure existentials vs. pure presentationals. In Existential Constructions across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 76], ► pp. 102 ff.
Gregory, Michelle L. & Laura A. Michaelis
2001. Topicalization and left-dislocation: a functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 33:11 ► pp. 1665 ff.
Grobet, Anne
2002. Références bibliographiques. In L’identification des topiques dans les dialogues [Champs linguistiques, ], ► pp. 393 ff.
Güldemann, Tom, Sabine Zerbian & Malte Zimmermann
2015. Variation in Information Structure with Special Reference to Africa. Annual Review of Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 155 ff.
Halevy, Rivka
2016. Non-canonical ‘existential-like‘ constructions in colloquial Modern Hebrew. In Atypical predicate-argument relations [Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa, 33], ► pp. 27 ff.
Halevy, Rivka
2020. Chapter 15. Impersonal and pseudo-impersonal constructions. In Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew [Studies in Language Companion Series, 210], ► pp. 539 ff.
Halevy, Rivka
2020. The existential construction and its type‑shifting instances in colloquial Modern Hebrew. In La Prédication existentielle dans les langues naturelles : valeurs et repérages, structures et modalités, ► pp. 83 ff.
Halevy, Rivka
2022. The existential construction in Spoken Modern Hebrew. Journal of Speech Sciences 11 ► pp. e022005 ff.
Halevy, Rivka
2023. Non-subject oriented existential, possessive and dative-experiencer constructions in Modern Hebrew – a cross-linguistic typological approach. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 76:4 ► pp. 545 ff.
Izre'el, Shlomo
2022. The syntax of existential constructions. Journal of Speech Sciences 11 ► pp. e022001 ff.
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. & Mercedes Tubino-Blanco
2022. Chapter 8. On the interpretation of the Spanish 1st person plural pronoun. In Points of Convergence in Romance Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 360], ► pp. 144 ff.
Jin, Dawei & Jun Chen
2022. Towards the copular status of clefts—Evidence from diachrony. Acta Linguistica Academica 69:3 ► pp. 301 ff.
Jing, Yingqi, Paul Widmer & Balthasar Bickel
2023. Word order evolves at similar rates in main and subordinate clauses. Diachronica 40:4 ► pp. 532 ff.
Jung-Sup Park
2018. Subject in French to Korean Translation. Language & Information Society 35:null ► pp. 119 ff.
Just, Erika
2023. Chapter 10. Differential indexing and information structure management. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227], ► pp. 269 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2023. Chapter 1. On the use of there -clefts with zero subject relativizer. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 17 ff.
KARSSENBERG, LENA
2017. Frenchil y aclefts, existential sentences and the Focus-Marking Hypothesis. Journal of French Language Studies 27:3 ► pp. 405 ff.
Karssenberg, Lena & Karen Lahousse
2018. The information structure of French il y a clefts and c’est clefts: A corpus-based analysis. Linguistics 56:3 ► pp. 513 ff.
Karssenberg, Lena, Karen Lahousse, Béatrice Lamiroy, Stefania Marzo & Ana Drobnjakovic
Karssenberg, Lena, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2018. Il y a toujours un chameau qui tombe. Les multiples fonctions des clivées en il y a. SHS Web of Conferences 46 ► pp. 01012 ff.
Katz Bourns, Stacey & Lindsy L. Myers
2014. Introduction. In Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 244], ► pp. vii ff.
Lamarre, Christine
2020. Chapter 16. Deixis personnelle et deixis spatiale. In The Expression of Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality in Albert Camus’s L'Étranger and Its Translations / L'Étranger de Camus et ses traductions : questions de temps, d'aspect, de modalité et d'évidentialité (TAME) [Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa, 35], ► pp. 304 ff.
Lena, Ludovica
2023. The (Non-)acquisition of the Chinese Definiteness Effect: A Usage-Based Account. In Learner Corpora: Construction and Explorations in Chinese and Related Languages [Chinese Language Learning Sciences, ], ► pp. 257 ff.
Lena, Ludovica
2023. Chapter 8. Partition and existence. In Existential Constructions across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 76], ► pp. 245 ff.
Lenartaitė-Gotaučienė, Kristina
2014. Alternations in argument realization and problematic cases of subjecthood in Lithuanian. In Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 1], ► pp. 137 ff.
Levinsohn, Stephen H.
2006. Towards a Typology of Story Development Marking (Repeatedly Naming the Subject: The Hebrew Equivalent of Greek Δέ). Journal of Translation 2:2 ► pp. 31 ff.
Manfredi, Stefano
2022. Pain Constructions in modern Arabic dialects: a typological overview. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:4 ► pp. 501 ff.
Matić, Dejan, Rik van Gijn & Robert D. van Valin Jr.
2014. Information structure and reference tracking in complex sentences: An overview. In Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences [Typological Studies in Language, 105], ► pp. 1 ff.
Melnik, Nurit
2006. A constructional approach to verb-initial constructions in Modern Hebrew. Cognitive Linguistics 17:2
MELNIK, NURIT
2017. Raising, inversion and agreement in modern Hebrew. Journal of Linguistics 53:1 ► pp. 147 ff.
Melnik, Nurit
Melnik, Nurit
2020. Chapter 12. Agreement alternations in Modern Hebrew. In Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew [Studies in Language Companion Series, 210], ► pp. 421 ff.
Moezzipour, Farhad & Seyyed Ali Ostovar-Namaghi
2023. Ra-centric constructions at Persian left-periphery: an RRG account. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 59:2 ► pp. 407 ff.
Mora-Bustos, Armando
2023. Clíticos y operadores en el ámbito verbal del mazahua (otomangue). Lengua y Sociedad 22:2 ► pp. 303 ff.
Nguyen, An D. & Geraldine Legendre
2022. The acquisition of wh-questions: Beyond structural economy and input frequency. Language Acquisition 29:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Nishida, Chiyo, Adrián Rodríguez Riccelli & Casilde A. Isabelli
2024. Adult heritage speakers of Spanish in the US and subject placement in presentational unaccusative sentences: How are their grammars constrained?. Lingua 302 ► pp. 103630 ff.
Nuhn, Patrick
2019. Reversedang-inversion and narrow focus marking in Tagalog. Studies in Language 43:2 ► pp. 469 ff.
Onea, Edgar
Ozerov, Pavel
2021. Multifactorial Information Management (MIM): summing up the emerging alternative to Information Structure. Linguistics Vanguard 7:1
Pinheiro-Correa, Paulo
2018. LA SINTAXIS DE LOS ENUNCIADOS TÉTICOS Y CATEGÓRICOS EN DOS TRADUCCIONES DE CORAZONES SOLITARIOS DE RUBEM FONSECA AL ESPAÑOL. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada 57:1 ► pp. 229 ff.
Queixalós, Francesc
2016. The role of nominalization in theticity. In Finiteness and Nominalization [Typological Studies in Language, 113], ► pp. 205 ff.
Roessig, Simon, Bodo Winter & Doris Mücke
2022. Tracing the Phonetic Space of Prosodic Focus Marking. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 5
Rovai, Francesco
2019. Chapter 10. Impersonal passives and the suffix -r in the Indo-European languages. In Historical Linguistics 2015 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 348], ► pp. 188 ff.
Russi, Cinzia
2014. On the relationship between sentence focus category, subject-verb order, and genericity: A preliminary analysis of some Italian unaccusatives. In Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 244], ► pp. 39 ff.
Sarda, Laure & Ludovica Lena
2023. Chapter 1. Existential constructions. In Existential Constructions across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 76], ► pp. 1 ff.
Schultze-Berndt, Eva
2022. When subjects frame the clause: discontinuous noun phrases as an iconic strategy for marking thetic constructions. Linguistics 60:3 ► pp. 865 ff.
Seržant, Ilja A.
2016. The nominative case in Baltic in a typological perspective. In Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 3], ► pp. 137 ff.
Silvennoinen, Olli O.
2023. Not Just Contrastive: Constructions with Negated Restrictives in English. Journal of English Linguistics 51:4 ► pp. 346 ff.
Simmul, Carl Eric
2024. Information structure of converb constructions: Estonian -des, -mata and -maks constructions. Folia Linguistica 58:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Somers, Joren, Gard B. Jenset & Jóhanna Barðdal
2024. Argument structure constructions in competition: The Dat-Nom/Nom-Dat alternation in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.
Topaloğlu, Simge & Mine Nakipoğlu
2017. Sınırlayıcı Odak Parçacığı Sadece’nin Edinimi. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 28:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Trotzke, Andreas & Stefano Quaglia
2016. Particle topicalization and German clause structure. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 109 ff.
Valin, Jr., Robert D. van
2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface,
van Putten, Saskia
2016. Discourse functions of focus marking in Avatime. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 37:1
van der Wal, Jenneke
2015. A Note on the (Non-Existing) Passive in Matengo. Linguistique et langues africaines :1 ► pp. 81 ff.
Verhoeven, Elisabeth
2015. Thematic Asymmetries Do Matter! A Corpus Study of German Word Order. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Vydrina, Alexandra
Wang, Bruce Xiao, Si Chen, Fang Zhou, Jiang Liu, Cheng Xiao, Angel Chan & Tempo Tang
2024. English Prosodic Focus Marking by Cantonese Trilingual Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 67:3 ► pp. 782 ff.
Wulf, Detmer
2018. Fokus-Hintergrund-Gliederung. In Handbuch Pragmatik, ► pp. 214 ff.
Yliniemi, Juha
2016. Attention marker =ɕoin Denjongke (Sikkimese Bhutia). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 39:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Yliniemi, Juha
2023. Similarity of mirative and contrastive focus: three parameters for describing attention markers. Linguistic Typology 27:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
강승만
2014. Focus and Inversion in English. Studies in English Language & Literature 40:4 ► pp. 235 ff.
김일규
2013. Root Phenomena and the Nature of Korean -(n)un. Discourse and Cognition 20:3 ► pp. 27 ff.
[no author supplied]
2006. References. In Split Intransitivity in Italian,
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2021. Reversed ang-inversion and narrow focus marking in Tagalog. In Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic Units [Benjamins Current Topics, 114],
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.