Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 24:3 (2000) ► pp.694–703
Book review

Gunlög Josefsson. Minimal Words in a Minimal Syntax
Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1998.

Reviewed by
| University of Groningen
Published online: 16 March 2001
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.24.3.09ack
References
Arad, Maya
1996 “A minimalist view of the syntax-lexical semantics interface”. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 81: 215–242.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert
1994 “Against split morphology”. In: Booij, G.; and Marle, J. van (eds), Yearbook of Morphology 1993 27–50. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1994 “The projection of arguments”. In: Benedicto, E.; and Runner, J. (eds), Functional projections 19–47. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1986 Barriers. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1994 “Bare phrase structure”. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 51.Google Scholar
Don, Jan
1993 Morphological conversion. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University. Utrecht: OTS publications.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
1992 “Properties of non-heads in compounds: A case study”. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 491: 27–58.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994 The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1983 “Word-formation and the lexicon”. In: Ingemann, F. (ed.) 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference Papers 3–29. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle
1983 “Argument linking and compounds in English”. Linguistic Inquiry 141: 251–285.Google Scholar
1992 Deconstructing morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott
1984 “Zero-derivation and inflection”. In: Speas, M.; and Sproat, R. (eds), Papers from the January 1984 MIT workshop in morphology. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 71: 53–69.Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard
1985 On deriving the lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar