Grammaticalisation studies are a potential meeting ground for theoretical linguistics and corpus-based approaches. The present paper uses evidence from the ARCHER corpus to investigate the relationship between frequency and the grammaticalisation of the get-passive. It seeks to verify whether the grammaticalisation of the passive function is reflected in an increase in the overall frequency of get, and whether grammaticalised patterns of get have spread at the expense of its lexical use. Givón/Yang (1993) have singled out several patterns that were involved in the grammaticalisation of the get-passive. Data from ARCHER are analysed to find out which of these patterns were frequent and which were of marginal importance. Finally, evidence from standard one-million-word corpora is used to test existing hypotheses on the maturation of the get-‘passive’. These data show that it has not lost its middle semantics and come closer to a true passive.
2024. The be‐ versusget‐passive alternation in world Englishes. World Englishes 43:1 ► pp. 86 ff.
SCHNEIDER, ULRIKE
2023. Reflexive analytic causatives: a diachronic analysis of transitivity parameters. English Language and Linguistics 27:4 ► pp. 789 ff.
Ahn, Kyou-Dong
2022. From the incomplete to the complete: The emergence of a new paradigm of sentence-final particles in Korean. Journal of Pragmatics 201 ► pp. 160 ff.
2022. Review of Seongha Rhee. 2021. Linguistic Forms at the Border of Lexis and Grammar: Grammaticalizaton of Adpositions across Languages. Seoul, Global Contents Publisher. ISBN 979-11-5852-358-9. Russian Journal of Linguistics 26:3 ► pp. 831 ff.
Mair, Christian & Geoffrey N. Leech
2020. Current Changes in English Syntax. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, ► pp. 249 ff.
2012. Clumsy, awkward or having a peculiar propriety? Prescriptive judgements and language change in the 19th century. Language Sciences 34:1 ► pp. 28 ff.
ANDERWALD, LIESELOTTE
2014. Measuring the success of prescriptivism: quantitative grammaticography, corpus linguistics and the progressive passive. English Language and Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Anderwald, Lieselotte
2018. Language change and cultural change: The grammaticalization of the get-passive in context. Language & Communication 62 ► pp. 1 ff.
2012. Expanding horizons in historical linguistics with the 400-million word Corpus of Historical American English. Corpora 7:2 ► pp. 121 ff.
Davies, Mark
2015. The importance of robust corpora in providing more realistic descriptions of variation in English grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 1:1 ► pp. 305 ff.
Mark Davies
2013. Examining syntactic variation in English: The importance of corpus design and corpus size. English Language and Linguistics 19:3 ► pp. 1 ff.
HONDA, SHOKO
2012. ON THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE GET-PASSIVE: WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO GRAMMATICALIZATION. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 29:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Jong-Bok Kim
2012. English Get-Passive Constructions: A Corpus-Based Approach. Studies in Generative Grammar 22:2 ► pp. 437 ff.
Rhee, Seongha
2012. Context-induced reinterpretation and (inter)subjectification: the case of grammaticalization of sentence-final particles. Language Sciences 34:3 ► pp. 284 ff.
Chung, Siaw-Fong
2011. Uses of ter- in Malay: A corpus-based study. Journal of Pragmatics 43:3 ► pp. 799 ff.
HOSAKA, MICHIO
2011. Diachronic Change in the English Passive. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 28:1 ► pp. 150 ff.
Davies, M.
2010. The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing 25:4 ► pp. 447 ff.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003. Grammaticalization,
[no author supplied]
2024. English. In Language in Britain and Ireland, ► pp. 9 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.