Article published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 25:2 (2001) ► pp.217–254
Coding choices in argument structure
Austronesian applicatives in texts
The syntactic properties of applicatives have received a large amount of attention. Despite this there have been almost no attempts to explain the reasons behind the choice of an applicative coding of an argument when there is an grammatical oblique coding strategy available. This study focuses on dynamic applicative constructions in Tukang Besi, an Austronesian language of central Indonesia, and examines a large corpus for reasons why applicative coding is chosen over oblique coding. Factors such as semantic role information and animacy are as important as textual prominence in the coding decision.
Cited by
Cited by 8 other publications
Arka, I Wayan & Nurenzia Yannuar
2016. On the morphosyntax and pragmatics of-inin Colloquial Jakartan Indonesian. Indonesia and the Malay World 44:130 ► pp. 342 ff. 
Donohue, Mark
2008. Malay as a mirror of Austronesian: Voice development and voice variation. Lingua 118:10 ► pp. 1470 ff.
Klamer, Marian
2002. Ten years of synchronic Austronesian linguistics (1991–2002). Lingua 112:11 ► pp. 933 ff.
Valenzuela, Pilar M.
2016. “Simple” and “double” applicatives in Shiwilu (Kawapanan). Studies in Language 40:3 ► pp. 513 ff.
Viti, Carlotta
2008. From space words to transitive markers: the case of ancient Greek en‘in’1. Transactions of the Philological Society 106:3 ► pp. 375 ff.
Viti, Carlotta
2008. Coding spatial relations in Homeric Greek: preverbs vs. prepositions. Historical Linguistics 121:1 ► pp. 114 ff.
Viti, Carlotta
2009. Pragmatic implications of head and dependent marking. Folia Linguistica 43:2
[no author supplied]
2009. Book reviews. Folia Linguistica 43:2
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.