Review published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 25:2 (2001) ► pp. 347353
References
Abraham, W.
(ed.) 1991Discourse particles. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, D.
1987Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brinton, L.
1996Pragmatic Markers in English. Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Discourse Processes
24:1 1997Special issue on Discourse Markers from a cognitive point of view. W. Spooren & R. Risselada (eds.). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Journal of Pragmatics
30:2 1998Special issue on Discourse Markers and coherence relations. R. Risselada & W. Spooren (eds.). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, A. & Y. Ziv
(eds.) 1998Discourse markers. Descriptions and theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foolen, A.
1996 “Pragmatic particles.” In: J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. 24 pp. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fraser, B.
1996 “Pragmatic markers.” Pragmatics 61, 167–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 “What are discourse markers?Journal of Pragmatics 311, 931–952. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. Mosegaard
1996 “Some common discourse particles in spoken French.” In: M. Mosegaard Hansen & G. Skytte (eds.), Le discours: Cohérence et Connexion. Actes du colloque international, Copenhague le 7 avril 1995, 105–149. (= Etudes Romanes, 351). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
1998a “The semantic status of discourse markers.” Lingua 1041: 235–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harder, P.
1996Functional semantics. A theory of meaning, structure and tense in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kroon, C.
1995Discourse particles in Latin. A study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at. Amsterdam: Gieben. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenberk, F.
1991 “Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization.” Language 671: 475–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D.
1987Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schourup, L.
1999 “Discourse markers.” Lingua 1071, 227–265. CrossrefGoogle Scholar