Article published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 26:1 (2002) ► pp.125–163
“Object complements” and conversation towards a realistic account
Based on a corpus of conversational English, I argue that the standard view of complements as subordinate clauses in a grammatical relation with a complement-taking predicate is not supported by the data. Rather, what has been described under the heading of complementation can be understood in terms of epistemic/evidential/evaluative formulaic fragments expressing speaker stance toward the content of a clause. This analysis, in which CTPs and their subjects are stored and retrieved as formulaic stance markers accounts for the grammatical, pragmatic, prosodic, and phonological data more satisfactorily than a complementation analysis.
Cited by
Cited by 241 other publications
Ambridge, Ben & Adele E. Goldberg
2008. The island status of clausal complements: Evidence in favor of an information structure explanation. Cognitive Linguistics 19:3 
Amon, Marri
2023. Between rhetorical questions and information requests: A versatile interrogative clause in Estonian. Open Linguistics 9:1
Andersen, Anders & Erling Strudsholm
2023. Il congiuntivo alla danese. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 58:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Ariel, Mira
2009. Discourse, grammar, discourse. Discourse Studies 11:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Auer, Peter
2009. Projection and Minimalistic Syntax in Interaction. Discourse Processes 46:2-3 ► pp. 180 ff.
Auer, Peter & Jan Lindström
2016. Left/right asymmetries and the grammar of pre- vs. post-positioning in German and Swedish talk-in-interaction. Language Sciences 56 ► pp. 68 ff.
Battistella, Edwin, Vit Bubenik, Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrii Danylenko, Patrick J. Duffley, Peter Grund, Shin Ja J. Hwang, John E. Joseph, Johanna Laakso, Alan R. Libert, Kanavillil Rajagopalan, Kanavillil Rajagopalan, Kanavillil Rajagopalan, Kanavillil Rajagopalan, Solomon I. Sara, Delfina Sessa, Thomas Stolz, Graham Thurgood, Heli Tissari, Edward J. Vajda, Edward J. Vajda, Edward J. Vajda, Edward J. Vajda & Elly van Gelderen
2005. Reviews. <i>WORD</i> 56:2 ► pp. 249 ff.
Berthe, Florine
2022. From the pseudo-cleft to the the-N-is construction in spoke. Anglophonia :33
Biq, Yung-O
2004. Construction, reanalysis, and stance: ‘V yi ge N’ and variations in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 36:9 ► pp. 1655 ff.
Boas, Hans C. & Francisco Gonzálvez-García
2014. Chapter 1. Applying constructional concepts to Romance languages. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 1 ff.
BOYD, JEREMY K. & ADELE E. GOLDBERG
2009. Input Effects Within a Constructionist Framework. The Modern Language Journal 93:3 ► pp. 418 ff.
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
2014. (Inter)subjectification in a functional theory of grammaticalization. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 46:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
2021. Complement-taking predicates, parentheticals and grammaticalization. Language Sciences 88 ► pp. 101416 ff.
Brandt, Silke
2020. Social cognitive and later language acquisition. In Current Perspectives on Child Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 27], ► pp. 155 ff.
Brandt, Silke, Stephanie Hargreaves & Anna Theakston
2023. Putting Complement Clauses into Context: Testing the Effects of Story Context, False‐Belief Understanding, and Syntactic form on Children's and Adults’ Comprehension and Production of Complement Clauses. Cognitive Science 47:7
Brandt, Silke, Honglan Li & Angel Chan
2023. What makes a complement false? Looking at the effects of verbal semantics and perspective in Mandarin children’s interpretation of complement-clause constructions and their false-belief understanding. Cognitive Linguistics 0:0
Brandt, Silke, Arie Verhagen, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello
2011. German children's productivity with simple transitive and complement-clause constructions: Testing the effects of frequency and variability. cogl 22:2 ► pp. 325 ff.
Brinton, Laurel J.
2020. The development and pragmatic function of a non-inference marker. In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96], ► pp. 251 ff.
Brook, Marisa
2018. Taking it up a level: Copy-raising and cascaded tiers of morphosyntactic change. Language Variation and Change 30:2 ► pp. 231 ff.
Brook, Marisa
2020.
I feel like and it feels like: Two paths to the emergence of epistemic markers. Linguistics Vanguard 6:1
Butler, C.S.
2006. Functionalist Theories of Language. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 696 ff.
Butler, Christopher S.
2009. Criteria of adequacy in functional linguistics. FLIN 43:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bybee, Joan
2007. Adele Goldberg, Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Pp. 280. ISBN 0-19-9-268517 and 0-19-9-268525 (pbk).. Journal of Child Language 34:3 ► pp. 692 ff.
BYBEE, JOAN
2023. What Is Usage‐Based Linguistics?. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 7 ff.
Béguelin, Marie-José
2011. Linguistique de la langue et linguistique de la parole. In Du système linguistique aux actions langagières [Champs linguistiques, ], ► pp. 641 ff.
Cacoullos, Rena Torres & James A. Walker
2009. On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: a variationist study of that. Linguistics 47:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Calude, Andreea S. & Gerald P. Delahunty
2022. Inferentials in spoken English. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 307 ff.
Chang, Li-Hsiang
2009. Stance uses of the Mandarin LE constructions in conversational discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 41:11 ► pp. 2240 ff.
Christensen, Tanya Karoli & Torben Juel Jensen
2015. Word order variation and foregrounding of complement clauses. In Language Variation - European Perspectives V [Studies in Language Variation, 17], ► pp. 69 ff.
Clift, Rebecca
2005. Discovering order. Lingua 115:11 ► pp. 1641 ff.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Sandra A. Thompson
2008. On assessing situations and events in conversation: `extraposition' and its relatives. Discourse Studies 10:4 ► pp. 443 ff.
Cristofaro, Sonia
2016. Chapter 15. Routes to insubordination. In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115], ► pp. 393 ff.
Deppermann, Arnulf & Silke Reineke
2020. Practices of indexing discrepant assumptions with Germanich dachte(‘I thought’) in talk-in-interaction. Functions of Language 27:2 ► pp. 113 ff.
Deulofeu, José
2008. Quel statut pour l'élément QUE en français contemporain ?. Langue française n° 158:2 ► pp. 29 ff.
Dontcheva‐Navratilova, Olga
2012. Grammar and Discourse. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Dąbrowska, Ewa
2008. Questions with long-distance dependencies: A usage-based perspective. Cognitive Linguistics 19:3
Dąbrowska, Ewa
2010. The mean lean grammar machine meets the human mind: Empirical investigations of the mental status of linguistic rules. In Cognitive Foundations of Linguistic Usage Patterns, ► pp. 149 ff.
Dąbrowska, Ewa, Caroline Rowland & Anna Theakston
2009. The acquisition of questions with long-distance dependencies. Cognitive Linguistics 20:3
D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2014. Independent complement constructions in Swedish and Danish: Insubordination or dependency shift?. Journal of Pragmatics 60 ► pp. 89 ff.
Egan, Thomas
2015. Complementation. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Endo, Tomoko
2023. Sequential positions and interactional functions of negative epistemic constructions in Japanese conversation. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 39:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Endo, Tomoko & Daisuke Yokomori
2020. Chapter 8. Self-addressed questions as fixed expressions for epistemic stance marking in Japanese conversation. In Fixed Expressions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 315], ► pp. 203 ff.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
Foolen, Ad, Helen de Hoop & Gijs Mulder
Fox, Barbara A., Yael Maschler & Susanne Uhmann
2010. A cross-linguistic study of self-repair: Evidence from English, German, and Hebrew. Journal of Pragmatics 42:9 ► pp. 2487 ff.
Fox, Barbara A. & Sandra A. Thompson
2010. Responses toWh-Questions in English Conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 43:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Gablasova, Dana, Vaclav Brezina, Tony Mcenery & Elaine Boyd
2017. Epistemic Stance in Spoken L2 English: The Effect of Task and Speaker Style. Applied Linguistics 38:5 ► pp. 613 ff.
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis, Eliese-Sophia Lincke, Kiki Nikiforidou & Anna Piata
2020. On the polysemy of motion verbs in Ancient Greek and Coptic. Studies in Language 44:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
Geva, Yuval
2023. Syntax and music for interaction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2016. Review of Boas & Gonzálvez-García (2014): Romance perspectives on Construction Grammar. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 235 ff.
González, Montserrat
2018. Chapter 7. ‘No sé’. In Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 290], ► pp. 147 ff.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2009. The family of object-related depictives in English and Spanish: towards a usage-based constructionist analysis. Language Sciences 31:5 ► pp. 663 ff.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2011. Review of Leino (2008): Constructional Reorganization. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9:2 ► pp. 419 ff.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2014. Chapter 6. Bringing together fragments and constructions. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 181 ff.
Guz, Wojciech & Łukasz Jędrzejowski
2023. Chapter 7. Polish że ‘that’ as an elaboration marker. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227], ► pp. 167 ff.
Günthner, Susanne
2008. „die Sache ist…“: eine Projektor-Konstruktion im gesprochenen Deutsch. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 27:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Günthner, Susanne
2009. Konstruktionen in der kommunikativen Praxis. Zur Notwendigkeit einer interaktionalen Anreicherung konstruktionsgrammatischer Ansätze. ZFGL 37:3 ► pp. 402 ff.
Günthner, Susanne
2011. Between emergence and sedimentation: Projecting constructions in German interactions. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ► pp. 156 ff.
Haddington, Pentti
2012. Pragmatics of Stance. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Haselow, Alexander
2016. A processual view on grammar: macrogrammar and the final field in spoken syntax. Language Sciences 54 ► pp. 77 ff.
Haselow, Alexander
2016. Micro- et macro-syntaxe : sur deux principes de catégorisation cognitive en langue orale spontanée. Modèles linguistiques XXXVIII:74 ► pp. 29 ff.
Heffernan, Kevin, Yusuke Imanishi & Masaru Honda
2018. Showcasing the interaction of generative and emergent linguistic knowledge with case marker omission in spoken Japanese. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1
Heine, Bernd & Gunther Kaltenböck
2021. From clause to discourse marker: on the development of comment clauses. Language Sciences 87 ► pp. 101400 ff.
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2015. Searching for motivations for grammatical patternings. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 453 ff.
Helmer, Henrike, Silke Reineke & Arnulf Deppermann
2016. A range of uses of negative epistemic constructions in German: ICH WEIß NICHT as a resource for dispreferred actions. Journal of Pragmatics 106 ► pp. 97 ff.
Hennemann, Anja
2016. A cognitive-constructionist approach to Spanish creo Ø and creo yo ‘[I] think’. Folia Linguistica 50:2
Hennoste, Tiit, Andriela Rääbis & Andra Rumm
2019. Estonian declarative questions: Their usage and comparison with vä- and jah-questions. Journal of Pragmatics 153 ► pp. 46 ff.
Herlin, Ilona, Jyrki Kalliokoski & Laura Visapää
Hoek, Jet, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted J.M. Sanders
2018. Segmenting discourse: Incorporating interpretation into segmentation?. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14:2 ► pp. 357 ff.
Howe, Chad
2011. Structural autonomy in grammaticalization: Leveling and retention with Spanish hacer + time. Probus 23:2
Hsieh, Chen-Yu Chester
2018. From turn-taking to stance-taking: Wenti-shi ‘(the) thing is’ as a projector construction and an epistemic marker in Mandarin conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 127 ► pp. 107 ff.
Hu, Jian
2023. Introduction. In A Constructional Approach to Interpersonal Metaphor of Modality [Peking University Linguistics Research, 7], ► pp. 1 ff.
Ishkhanyan, Byurakn, Halima Sahraoui, Peter Harder, Jesper Mogensen & Kasper Boye
2017. Grammatical and lexical pronoun dissociation in French speakers with agrammatic aphasia: A usage-based account and REF-based hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics 44 ► pp. 1 ff.
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2015. A multiple-grammar model of speakers’ linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2023. Editorial. Text & Talk 43:5 ► pp. 569 ff.
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Foong Ha Yap
2015. Stance-marking and stance-taking in Asian languages. Journal of Pragmatics 83 ► pp. 1 ff.
Izre'el, Shlomo
2022. The syntax of existential constructions. Journal of Speech Sciences 11 ► pp. e022001 ff.
Jacquin, Jérôme, F. Neveu, B. Harmegnies, L. Hriba, S. Prévost & A. Steuckardt
2020. Withdrawn article: Étudier les marqueurs épistémiques et évidentiels du français tels qu’ils émergent dans la parole-en-interaction. Synthèse critique de la littérature existante. SHS Web of Conferences 78 ► pp. 01007 ff.
Janssens, Karolien & Jan Nuyts
2014. How did we think?. In The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 247], ► pp. 149 ff.
Johari, Nurul Muizzah, Puteri N. E. Nohuddin, Ahmad Hanif Ahmad Baharin, Noor Azuddin Yakob & Mohammad Javad Ebadi
2022. Features requirement elicitation process for designing a chatbot application. IET Networks
Kaatari, Henrik
2018. On the syntactic status of I 'm sure. Corpora 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2008. Prosody and function of English comment clauses. Folia Linguistica 42:1-2
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2014. Processibility. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 117 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2016. Elément de macro-syntaxe : comment catégoriser une classe insaississable ?. Modèles linguistiques XXXVIII:74 ► pp. 11 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann
2016. Extra-clausal constituents. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 1 ff.
Kaneyasu, Michiko
2020. Interactional relevance of linguistic categories: Epistemic modals daroo and deshoo in Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 155 ► pp. 145 ff.
Keevallik, Leelo
2011. Pro-Forms as Projective Devices in Interaction. Discourse Processes 48:6 ► pp. 404 ff.
Keevallik, Leelo
2016. Abandoning dead ends: The Estonian junction marker maitea ‘I don’t know’. Journal of Pragmatics 106 ► pp. 115 ff.
Keevallik, Leelo & Ann Weatherall
2020. Chapter 2. ‘I understand’-initiated formulations of the other. In Fixed Expressions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 315], ► pp. 11 ff.
Keizer, Evelien
2009. The interpersonal level in English: Reported speech. Linguistics 47:4
Keizer, Evelien
2016. The (the) fact is (that) construction in English and Dutch. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 59 ff.
Keizer, Evelien
2018. Interpersonal adverbs in FDG. In Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 205], ► pp. 48 ff.
Keizer, Evelien
2020. Modelling stance adverbs in grammatical theory: tackling heterogeneity with Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 82 ► pp. 101273 ff.
Keizer, Evelien
2022. Premodification in X-is constructions. In English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 221], ► pp. 236 ff.
Kidd, Evan, Elena V.M. Lieven & Michael Tomasello
2010. Lexical frequency and exemplar-based learning effects in language acquisition: evidence from sentential complements. Language Sciences 32:1 ► pp. 132 ff.
Koivisto, Aino
2014. Utterances ending in the conjunction että. In Contexts of Subordination [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 249], ► pp. 223 ff.
Kosonozhkina, Lyudmila Valentinovna
2018. MANIFESTATION OF ELLIPTICITY AT DIFFERENT LEVELS OF LANGUAGE SYSTEM (BY THE MATERIAL OF J. HIGGINS’S NOVEL “SAD WIND FROM THE SEA”). Philology. Theory & Practice :3 ► pp. 117 ff.
Kärkkäinen, Elise
2006. Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse Communication Studies 26:6 ► pp. 699 ff.
Kärkkäinen, Elise
2012. I thought it was very interesting. Conversational formats for taking a stance. Journal of Pragmatics 44:15 ► pp. 2194 ff.
KÖYMEN, BAHAR, ELENA LIEVEN & SILKE BRANDT
2016. Syntactic and semantic coordination in finite complement-clause constructions: a diary-based case study. Journal of Child Language 43:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
Küttner, Uwe-A., Anna Vatanen & Jörg Zinken
2022. Invoking Rules in Everyday Family Interactions: A Method for Appealing to Practical Reason. Human Studies 45:4 ► pp. 793 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W
2006. On the continuous debate about discreteness. Cognitive Linguistics 17:1
Langacker, Ronald W.
2014. Subordination in a dynamic account of grammar. In Contexts of Subordination [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 249], ► pp. 17 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2016. Toward an integrated view of structure, processing, and discourse. In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54], ► pp. 23 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2016. Working toward a synthesis. Cognitive Linguistics 27:4 ► pp. 465 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2016. Metaphor in Linguistic Thought and Theory. Cognitive Semantics 2:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2017. Evidentiality in Cognitive Grammar. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 13 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2019. Levels of Reality. Languages 4:2 ► pp. 22 ff.
Laury, Ritva
2012. Syntactically Non-Integrated FinnishJos‘If’-Conditional Clauses as Directives. Discourse Processes 49:3-4 ► pp. 213 ff.
Laury, Ritva & Marja-Liisa Helasvuo
2016. Disclaiming epistemic access with ‘know’ and ‘remember’ in Finnish. Journal of Pragmatics 106 ► pp. 80 ff.
Laury, Ritva & Marja-Liisa Helasvuo
2020. Chapter 3. The emergence and routinization of complex syntactic patterns formed with ajatella ‘think’ and tietää ‘know’ in Finnish talk-in-interaction. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 55 ff.
Laury, Ritva, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Janica Rauma
2020. Chapter 6. When an expression becomes fixed. In Fixed Expressions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 315], ► pp. 133 ff.
Laury, Ritva & Tsuyoshi Ono
2015. The limits of grammar: Clause combining in Finnish and Japanese conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 561 ff.
Leclercq, Pascale
2021. The Acquisition of Verbal Epistemic Stance Marking during Study Abroad: The Case of je pense in L2 French. Languages 6:4 ► pp. 196 ff.
Lelandais, Manon
2020. Modelling the interpretative impact of subordinate constructions in spontaneous conversation. Corela :18-2
Lelandais, Manon & Gaëlle Ferré
2017. How Are Three Syntactic Types of Subordinate Clauses Different in Terms of Informational Weight?. Anglophonia :23
Lelandais, Manon & Gabriel Thiberge
2023. The role of prosody and hand gestures in the perception of boundaries in speech✰. Speech Communication 150 ► pp. 41 ff.
Lemmens, Maarten
2019. In defense of frequency generalizations and usage-based linguistics. An answer to Frederick Newmeyer’s “Conversational corpora : when big is beautiful”. CogniTextes 19:Volume 19
Lim, Ni-Eng
2019. Chapter 6. Preliminaries to delicate matters. In Current Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 10], ► pp. 105 ff.
Lindström, Jan, Yael Maschler & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2016. A cross-linguistic perspective on grammar and negative epistemics in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 106 ► pp. 72 ff.
Long, Hai-Ping, Bernd Heine, Gui-Jun Ruan & Meng-Yue Wu
2018. The grammaticalizational relation between two Modern Chinese wo xiang ‘I think’ constructions. Language Sciences 66 ► pp. 212 ff.
Long, Haiping, Bernd Heine & Francesco-Alessio Ursini
2020. Prosody and formation of Modern Chinese parenthetical CTMP ni xiang ‘you think’: A conjoining pathway account. Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:3 ► pp. 369 ff.
Long, Haiping, Xianhui Wang & Lei Wang
2022. Formation of Modern Chinese speech-quotativenǐ shuō‘you say’ and feedback-seekingnǐ shuō‘you tell me’. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 23:4 ► pp. 743 ff.
Long, Haiping, Fang Wu, Francesco Ursini & Zhijun Qin
2021. On the formation of a conjecturing clause-taking predicate in Modern Chinese. Functions of Language 28:2 ► pp. 183 ff.
Long, Haiping, Xiaoxian Xu, Mengyue Wu & Francesco-Alessio Ursini
2019. Formation of the Modern Chinese clause-taking imperative ni kan ‘you see’: A Conjoining pathway account. Lingua 232 ► pp. 102745 ff.
Maekelberghe, Charlotte
2021. Assessing the impact of syntactic complement type on the modifying status of complement-taking predicates: the case of imagine. Language Sciences 86 ► pp. 101390 ff.
Marshall, Sally
2015. Evidential stance in translation: patterns of complementation in mediated memories. The Translator 21:1 ► pp. 50 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2017. Chapter 1. The emergence of Hebrew loydea / loydat (‘I dunno masc/fem’) from interaction. In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186], ► pp. 37 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2018. The on-line emergence of Hebrew insubordinateshe- (‘that/which/who’) clauses. Studies in Language 42:3 ► pp. 669 ff.
Maschler, Yael & Gonen Dori-Hacohen
2018. Constructing a genre: Hebrew ('ani) lo yode'a / lo yoda'at ‘(I) don’t know’ on Israeli political radio phone-ins. Text & Talk 38:5 ► pp. 575 ff.
Maschler, Yael & Carmit Miller Shapiro
2016. The role of prosody in the grammaticization of Hebrew naxon (‘right/true’): Synchronic and diachronic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 92 ► pp. 43 ff.
Maschler, Yael & Deborah Schiffrin
2015.
Discourse Markers
Language, Meaning, and Context
. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ► pp. 189 ff.
Mazeland, Harrie
2019. Position Expansion in Meeting Talk: An Interaction-Re-organizing Type of and-Prefaced Other-Continuation. In Embodied Activities in Face-to-face and Mediated Settings, ► pp. 397 ff.
McGloin, Naomi H.
2014. Subordination and information status: A case ofToandKotocomplement clauses
in Japanese. In Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 156], ► pp. 13 ff.
Moriya, Tetsuharu & Kaoru Horie
2015. The Neg-Raising Phenomenon as a product of grammaticalization. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166], ► pp. 121 ff.
Mulder, Gijs
2017. When feeling is thinking. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 105 ff.
Mulder, Gijs
2018. Chapter 4. (Yo) creo que as a marker of evidentiality and epistemic modality. In Evidence for Evidentiality [Human Cognitive Processing, 61], ► pp. 99 ff.
Nascimento, Thiago Da Cunha & Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
2023. Linguística Interacional. Revista Linguagem em Foco 15:1 ► pp. 274 ff.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2019. A rejoinder to Maarten Lemmens’s paper ‘In defence of frequency generalisations and usage-based linguistics. An answer to Frederick Newmeyer’s “Conversational corpora : when big is beautiful”’. CogniTextes 19:Volume 19
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2019. Conversational corpora : when “big is beautiful”. CogniTextes 19:Volume 19
Niemi, Jarkko
2015. Combining clauses in interaction. The voi olla että ‘(it) may be that’ utterance in Finnish. Journal of Pragmatics 77 ► pp. 80 ff.
Nir, Bracha
Nuyts, Jan & Karolien Janssens
2019. Parentheticals revisited: The case of Dutchdenken. Folia Linguistica 53:s40-s2 ► pp. 475 ff.
Ono, Tsuyoshi, Ritva Laury & Ryoko Suzuki
Ono, Tsuyoshi, Ritva Laury & Ryoko Suzuki
2021. On the notion of unit in the study of human languages. In Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic Units [Benjamins Current Topics, 114], ► pp. 1 ff.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona
2011. Emergent grammar for all practical purposes: the on-line formatting of left and right dislocations in French conversation. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ► pp. 45 ff.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona
2015. Grammar, projection and turn-organization. In Temporality in Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 27], ► pp. 173 ff.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Yael Maschler, Leelo Keevallik & Jan Lindström
2020. Chapter 1. Complex syntax-in-interaction. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 1 ff.
Pichler, Heike
2009. The functional and social reality of discourse variants in a northern English dialect: I DON'T KNOW and I DON'T THINK compared. Intercultural Pragmatics 6:4
Polak-Yitzhaki, Hilla & Yael Maschler
2016. Disclaiming understanding? Hebrew ˈani lo mevin/a (‘I don’t understand’) in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 106 ► pp. 163 ff.
Polak-Yitzhaki, Hilla & Yael Maschler
2023. From lack of understanding to heightened engagement: A multimodal study of Hebrew ′ATA LO MEVIN ‘You don’t understand’. Intercultural Pragmatics 20:5 ► pp. 521 ff.
Posio, Pekka
2011. Spanish subject pronoun usage and verb semantics revisited: First and second person singular subject pronouns and focusing of attention in spoken Peninsular Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 43:3 ► pp. 777 ff.
Raclaw, Joshua
2015. Book review: Ritva Laury and Ryoko Suzuki (eds), Subordination in Conversation: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Discourse & Society 26:3 ► pp. 391 ff.
Raymond, Chase Wesley, Jeffrey D. Robinson, Barbara A. Fox, Sandra A. Thompson & Kristella Montiegel
2021. Modulating action through minimization: Syntax in the service of offering and requesting. Language in Society 50:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Rivas, Javier
2016. Verb–object compounds with Spanishdar‘give’: an emergentgustar‘like’-type construction. <i>WORD</i> 62:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Rivas, Javier
2018. Immediacy, counter-expectation, and grammatical marking: Intransitive constructions with an accusative clitic in Galician/Galego
. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 11:2 ► pp. 367 ff.
Rodríguez Louro, Celeste
2015. The evolution of epistemic marking in West Australian English. In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 67], ► pp. 205 ff.
RODRÍGUEZ LOURO, CELESTE & THOMAS HARRIS
2013. Evolution with an attitude: the grammaticalisation of epistemic/evidential verbs in Australian English. English Language and Linguistics 17:3 ► pp. 415 ff.
Ruth-Hirrel, Laura & Sherman Wilcox
2018. Speech-gesture constructions in cognitive grammar: The case of beats and points. Cognitive Linguistics 29:3 ► pp. 453 ff.
Rönnqvist, Sara & Jan Lindström
2021. Turn Continuations and Gesture: “And Then”-Prefacing in Multi-Party Conversations. Frontiers in Communication 6
Salminen, Jutta
Schneider, Stefan
2013. Parenthetische Teilsätze in mittelfranzösischen Texten des 14. und 15. JahrhundertsEine erste Version dieses Aufsatzes wurde im September 2011 in Berlin im Rahmen der SektionZwischen Satz und Text: Diskursmarker und Informationsstruktur in romanischer Diachroniedes 32. Romanistentages vorgetragen. Ich danke den Sektionsteilnehmern für ihre Anmerkungen und Anregungen. Martin Hummel und Ulrich Wandruszka, denen ich an dieser Stelle ebenfalls danken möchte, haben weitere Versionen des Textes gelesen und kommentiert.. zrph 129:4 ► pp. 867 ff.
Schoonjans, Steven
2012. The particulization of German complement-taking mental predicates. Journal of Pragmatics 44:6-7 ► pp. 776 ff.
Seppänen, Eeva-Leena & Ritva Laury
2022. Complement clauses as turn continuations. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 553 ff.
Shank, Christopher, Julie Van Bogaert & Koen Plevoets
2016. The diachronic development of zero complementation: A multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with think, suppose, and believe. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12:1
Shank, Christopher & Koen Plevoets
2018. Investigating the impact of structural factors upon that/zero complementizer alternation patterns in verbs of cognition: a diachronic corpus-based multifactorial analysis. Research in Corpus Linguistics ► pp. 83 ff.
Shank, Christopher, Koen Plevoets & Julie Van Bogaert
2016. A multifactorial analysis of that/zero alternation. In Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 19], ► pp. 201 ff.
Shenk, Petra Scott
2006. The interactional and syntactic importance of prosody in Spanish-English bilingual discourse. International Journal of Bilingualism 10:2 ► pp. 179 ff.
Sherman, Tamah & František Tůma
2023. Claiming insufficient knowledge in pairwork and groupwork classroom activities. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 43 ► pp. 100758 ff.
SHIBASAKI, REIJIROU
2006. THE EVOLUTION OF PREFERRED ARGUMENT STRUCTURE IN ENGLISH. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 23:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
SHIBASAKI, REIJIROU
2014. ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF <i>THE POINT IS </i>AND RELATED ISSUES IN THE HISTORY OF AMERICAN ENGLISH. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 31:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Siyavoshi, Sara & Sherman Wilcox
2021. Exerting control: the grammatical meaning of facial displays in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics 32:4 ► pp. 609 ff.
Smith, Carlota S.
2003. Modes of Discourse,
Smith, Michael Sean
2013. “I thought” initiated turns: Addressing discrepancies in first-hand and second-hand knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics 57 ► pp. 318 ff.
Smith, Michael Sean & Lucas M. Seuren
2022. Re-apprehending misapprehensions: A practice for disclosing troubles in understanding in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 193 ► pp. 43 ff.
Staps, Camil & Johan Rooryck
2023. The interpretation of [+distal] in demonstratives and complementizers. Linguistics 61:5 ► pp. 1195 ff.
Steuck, Jonathan
2016. Exploring the syntax-semantics-prosody interface. In Inquiries in Hispanic Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 12], ► pp. 73 ff.
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2020. Chapter 11. Relative-clause increments and the management of reference. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 303 ff.
Su, Danjie
2017. Semantics and chunking in written and conversational discourses. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 8:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Taboada, Maite
2016. Sentiment Analysis: An Overview from Linguistics. Annual Review of Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 325 ff.
Taboada, Maite
2019. The space of coherence relations and their signalling in discourse. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 1:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
TANAKA, HIROKO
2008. Delaying dispreferred responses in English: From a Japanese perspective. Language in Society 37:4 ► pp. 487 ff.
Tao, Hongyin
2016. Disputed memory and the social interactive functions of remembering/forgetting expressions in Mandarin conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 106 ► pp. 184 ff.
Thompson, Sandra A. & Tsuyoshi Ono
2020. Chapter 1. Introduction. In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128], ► pp. 2 ff.
Tolvanen, Eveliina
2023. ‘I think’ in Swedish L1 and L2 group interactions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
Tompkins, Virginia, M. Jeffrey Farrar & Derek E. Montgomery
2019. Speaking Your Mind: Language and Narrative in Young Children's Theory of Mind Development [Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 56], ► pp. 109 ff.
Torres Cacoullos, Rena
2020. Code-Switching Strategies: Prosody and Syntax. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Scott A. Schwenter
2008. Constructions and pragmatics: Variable middle marking in Spanish subir(se) ‘go up’ and bajar(se) ‘go down’. Journal of Pragmatics 40:8 ► pp. 1455 ff.
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Catherine E. Travis
2014. Prosody, priming and particular constructions: The patterning of English first-person singular subject expression in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 63 ► pp. 19 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2020. Expressions of stance-to-text: discourse management markers as stance markers. Language Sciences 82 ► pp. 101329 ff.
Travis, Catherine E.
2007. Genre effects on subject expression in Spanish: Priming in narrative and conversation. Language Variation and Change 19:02
Travis, Catherine E. & Rena Torres Cacoullos
2012. Discourse Syntax. In The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics, ► pp. 653 ff.
Travis, Catherine E. & Rena Torres Cacoullos
Travis, Catherine E. & Rena Torres Cacoullos
2021. Categories and Frequency: Cognition Verbs in Spanish Subject Expression. Languages 6:3 ► pp. 126 ff.
Travis, Catherine E. & Rena Torres Cacoullos
2023. Form and function covariation: Obligation modals in Australian English. Language Variation and Change 35:3 ► pp. 351 ff.
Trnavac, Radoslava & Maite Taboada
2023. Engagement and constructiveness in online news comments in English and Russian. Text & Talk 43:2 ► pp. 235 ff.
Tsunoda, Tasaku
Usonienė, Aurelija
2013. On the morphosyntactic status of complement-taking predicate clauses in Lithuanian. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Van Bogaer, Julie
2011. I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics 49:2
VAN BOGAERT, JULIE
2010. A constructional taxonomy ofI thinkand related expressions: accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics 14:3 ► pp. 399 ff.
Van Bogaert, Julie & Torsten Leuschner
2015. Dutch ('t) schijnt and german scheint(')s: on the grammaticalization of evidential particles. Studia Linguistica 69:1 ► pp. 86 ff.
Van linden, An, Lieven Vandelanotte & Lieselotte Brems
2023. Revisiting complement and parenthetical constructions: theory and description. Language Sciences 98 ► pp. 101545 ff.
van Putten, Saskia
2014. Left dislocation and subordination in Avatime (Kwa). In Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences [Typological Studies in Language, 105], ► pp. 71 ff.
van Rooy, Bertus
2021. A Diasystematic Construction Grammar analysis of language change in the Afrikaans and English finite verb complement clause construction. In Constructions in Contact 2 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 30], ► pp. 110 ff.
van Valin, Robert D.
2017. Functional Linguistics. In The Handbook of Linguistics, ► pp. 141 ff.
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2004. Deixis and grounding in speech and thought representation. Journal of Pragmatics 36:3 ► pp. 489 ff.
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2008. Dependency, framing, scope? The syntagmatic structure of sentences of speech or thought representation.. <i>WORD</i> 59:1-2 ► pp. 55 ff.
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2023. Constructions of speech and thought representation. WIREs Cognitive Science 14:2
Vatanen, Anna
2018. Resisting an action in conversation by pointing out epistemic incongruence: Mä tiedän ‘I know’ responses in Finnish. Journal of Pragmatics 123 ► pp. 192 ff.
Vercellotti, Mary Lou & Jessica Packer
2016. Shifting structural complexity: The production of clause types in speeches given by English for academic purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 22 ► pp. 179 ff.
Vilkuna, Maria
2014. More subordinate?. In Contexts of Subordination [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 249], ► pp. 173 ff.
Wang, Haixia
2016. The (X) thing is: From a matrix clause to a discourse marker. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 52:3
Wang, Wei & Hongyin Tao
2020. Chapter 6. From matrix clause to turn expansion. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 151 ff.
Willems, Dominique & Claire Blanche-Benveniste
2014. Chapter 4. A constructional corpus-based approach to ‘weak’ verbs in French. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 113 ff.
Wu, Haiping
2022. Book review. Journal of Pragmatics 187 ► pp. 169 ff.
Wu, Yang & Zhoulin Ruan
2013. A Corpus-Based Study of Corporate Blog: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal
Xu, Fang & Rongping Cao
2022. Epistemic Stance in Chinese L2 Spoken English: The Effect of Grade and Genre-Specific Questions. Languages 8:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
Yatziv-Malibert, Il-Il & Martine Vanhove
2015. Quotative constructions and prosody in some Afroasiatic languages. In Corpus-based Studies of Lesser-described Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 68], ► pp. 117 ff.
Yu, Guodong
2020. Doing being objective: Turn design in the preliminary to a journalist’s question at the press conference of the National People’s Congress of China. Discourse, Context & Media 36 ► pp. 100414 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Introduction. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. 1 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Glossary. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. 286 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Subjectivity in texts. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. 155 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. The study of discourse. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. 7 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. The contribution of surface presentation. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. 185 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Temporal and spatial progression. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. 92 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Preface. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. xiii ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. The Texts. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. 267 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Referring expressions in discourse. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. 123 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Information in text passages. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. 243 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Aspectual information: the entities introduced in discourse. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. 67 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Discourse structure and Discourse Modes. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. 258 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Introduction to the Discourse Modes. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. 22 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Non-canonical structures and presentation. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. 213 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. Text representation and understanding. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. 49 ff.
[no author supplied]
2003. References. In Modes of Discourse, ► pp. 294 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. Book Reviews. Australian Journal of Linguistics 32:1 ► pp. 191 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. References. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ► pp. 741 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.