Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 26:2 (2002) ► pp.476486
Abraham, Werner
1995 “Morphological Case: No Need for Functional Projections in German.” In: Language and Cognition 51, Roel Jonkers, Edith Kaan and Anko Wiegel (eds.), 1–12. Groningen.Google Scholar
1997 “The base Structure of the German Clause under Discourse Functional Weight: Contentful Functional Categories vs. Derivative Ones.” In: German: Syntactic Problems  – Problematic Syntax, Werner Abraham and Elly van Gelderen (eds.), 11–43. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Molnárfi László
2002 “The German Clause under discourse functional weight: Focus and Antifocus.” In: Issues in Comparative German(ic) Typology ed. by W. Abraham & J. -W. Zwart. 1–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam, T. Holloway & G. Ramchand
(eds.) 1993Theoretical Perspectives on Word Order in South Asian Languages. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1993 “A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory.” In: The View from Building 20. Essays in Honor of Sylvian Bromberger, Kenneth Hale and Samuel J. Keyser (eds.), 1–52. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Massachusetts.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1998Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1993 “A Null Theory of Phrase and Compound Stress.” Linguistic Inquiry 24(2), 239–298.Google Scholar
Czepluch, Hartmut
1988 “Kasusmorphologie und Kasusrelationen: Überlegungen zur Kasustheorie am Beispieldes Deutschen.“ Linguistische Berichte 1181, 275–310.Google Scholar
Daneš, František
(ed.) 1974Papers on functional sentence perspective. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1964On defining Theme in functionalsentence analysis. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 11, 267–280.Google Scholar
1992Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1990Argument Structure. Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert
1993Deutsche Syntax- generativ. Vorstudien zur Theorie einer projektiven Grammatik. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1998Form Follows Function Fails  – as a Direct Explanation for Properties of Grammars. In: The Role of Pragmatics in Contemporary Philosophy. Paul Weingartner & Gerhard Schurz & Georg Dorn (eds.), 92–108. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert & Inger Rosengren
1998Scrambling. Sprache und Pragmatik 491, 1–104.Google Scholar
Hajičová, Eva & Barbara Partee and Petr Sgall
(eds.) 1998Topic-focus articulation, tripartite structures and semantic content. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoop, Helen de
1997 “Optional Scrambling and Predication.” Texas Linguistic Forum 381, 135–147.Google Scholar
2000 “Optional Scrambling and Interpretation.” In: Interface Strategies, Hans Bennis, Martin Everaert & Eric Reuland (eds.), 153–168. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy.Google Scholar
Horváth, Júlia
1995 “Structural Focus, Structural Case and the Notion of Feature-Assignment.” In: Discourse Configurational Languages, Katalin Éva Kiss (ed.), 28–64. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, Anoop
1991 “Clitic Doubling, Object Agreement and Specificity.” Proceedings of NELS 211.Google Scholar
Mathesius, Villem
1939 “On the so-called functional sentence perspective.” Slovo a Slovesnost 51, 171–174.Google Scholar
Molnárfi, László
1999 „Zur Diskurskomponente in der Sprechsprache: vir als Rhemamarkierer im Afrikaans.” In: Werner Abraham (ed.) Characteristic Issues in Spoken Vernaculars, Specialissue of Folia Linguistica 33(1), 75–100.Google Scholar
2002 “Focus and Antifocus in modern Afrikaans and West Germanic.” To appear in Linguistics 40/6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Gereon
1996 “Optional Movement and the Interaction of Economy Constraints.” In: Chris Wilder, Hans-Martin, Gärtner & Manfred Bierwisch (eds.) The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory, 115–145. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Tanya Reinhart
1998Scrambling and the PF Interface.” In: Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Gueder (eds.) The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, 309–353. Stanford: CSLI-publications.Google Scholar
Rosengren, Inger
1994 „Scrambling- was ist das?“ In: B. Haftka (ed.) Was determiniert Wortstellungsvariation?, 175–195. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter
1993Dutch Syntax. A Minimalist Approach. Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen.Google Scholar