Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 26:3 (2002) ► pp.681690
References (12)
References
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax. A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
. 1995/2000. “The Rise of Optimality Theory”. Glot International 1:6 (1995). 3–7. Updated in The First Glot International State-of-the-Article Book. The Latest in Linguistics (Lisa Cheng and Rint Sybesma. eds). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1994. “The Russian Declension: An Illustration of the Theory of Distributed Morphology”. Perspectives in Phonology (Jennifer Cole and Charles Kisseberth. eds). Stanford: CSLI. 29–60.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi; Noyer, Rolf. 1999. “Distributed Morphology”. Glot International 4:4. 3–9.Google Scholar
Legendre, Geraldine; Grimshaw, Jane; Vikner, Sten (eds). 2001. Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth; Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity. At the Syntax  – Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan. 1993. “Of Nominative and Accusative: The Hierarchical Assignment of Grammatical Case in Finnish”. Case and Other Functional Categories in Finnish Syntax (Anders Holmberg & Urpo Nikanne. eds). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 51–76.Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert. 1998. Review of Levin & Rappaport Hovav (1995). Word 491. 300–304.Google Scholar
. Inpreparation. La sémantique de l’inaccusativité.