Review published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 26:3 (2002) ► pp. 681690
Burzio, Luigi
1986Italian Syntax. A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
1995/2000 “The Rise of Optimality Theory”. Glot International 1:6 (1995) 3–7. Updated in The First Glot International State-of-the-Article Book. The Latest in Linguistics (Lisa Cheng and Rint Sybesma. eds). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris
1994 “The Russian Declension: An Illustration of the Theory of Distributed Morphology”. Perspectives in Phonology (Jennifer Cole and Charles Kisseberth. eds). Stanford: CSLI. 29–60.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi; Noyer, Rolf
1999 “Distributed Morphology”. Glot International 4:4. 3–9.Google Scholar
Legendre, Geraldine; Grimshaw, Jane; Vikner, Sten
(eds) 2001Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth; Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995Unaccusativity. At the Syntax  – Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan
1993 “Of Nominative and Accusative: The Hierarchical Assignment of Grammatical Case in Finnish”. Case and Other Functional Categories in Finnish Syntax (Anders Holmberg & Urpo Nikanne. eds). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 51–76.Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert
1998Review of Levin & Rappaport Hovav (1995). Word 491. 300–304.Google Scholar
Inpreparation. La sémantique de l’inaccusativité.