Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 26:3 (2002) ► pp.691–706
Book review

Uli Lutz, Gereon Müller & Arnim von Stechow. Wh-Scope Marking. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2000. [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 37].

Reviewed by
| Oklahoma State University
Published online: 1 November 2002
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.26.3.10vel
References (17)
References
Beck, Sigrid. 1996. “Quantified Structures as Barriers to LF Movement.” Natural Language Semantics 41:1–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa. 1991. On the Typology of wh-questions. Ph.D. diss., Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 151. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta. 1994. “Scope Marking as Indirect wh-Dependency.” Natural Language Semantics 21:137–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert & Anoop Mahajan. 1996. “Partial Movement and Successive Cyclicity.” In Lutz & Müller (eds.), 131–161.Google Scholar
Felser, Claudia. 2001. “ Wh-Expletives and Secondary Predication.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 13.1:5–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horvath, Julia. 1995. “Partial wh-Movement and wh ‘Scope Markers’.” In: István Kenesei (ed.), Levels and Structures, 69–124. Szeged: JATE. (Approaches to Hungarian 51.)Google Scholar
. 1997. “The Status of wh-Expletives and the Partial wh-Movement Construction of Hungarian.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 151:509–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. “On the Syntax of ‘wh-Scope-Marker’ Constructions: Some Comparative Evidence.” Ms. Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Lutz, Uli & Gereon Müller (eds.). 1996. Papers on wh-Scope Marking. Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 3401, Bericht Nr. 76.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Dana. 1989. “Partial and Multiple Wh-Movement.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 71:565–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 1996. “Partial wh-Movement and Optimality Theory.” In: Lutz & Müller (eds.), 179–230.Google Scholar
Pafel, Jürgen. 1997. Skopus und logische Struktur. Studien zum Quantorenskopus im Deutschen. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga. 1996. “On was-Parentheticals and Was … was Constructions in German.” In: Lutz & Müller (eds.), 257–288.Google Scholar
Richards, Norbert W. 1997. What Moves Where When in Which Language. Ph.D. diss., MIT.Google Scholar
Stechow, Arnim v. & Wolfgang Sternefeld. 1988. Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar