On contact-induced grammaticalization
Bernd Heine | Universität zu Köln
Tania Kuteva | Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Grammaticalization is based on universal strategies of conceptual transfer. Contact-induced language change on the other hand is an areally confined process resulting from specific historical events. What this suggests is that the two constitute quite divergent phenomena and, in fact, in the relevant literature they tend to be described as mutually exclusive processes. Accordingly, this literature abounds with discussions on whether some specific grammatical change is due to the former or the latter. The position taken in this paper is that the two are in no way mutually exclusive; rather, perhaps more often than not, they jointly conspire in triggering grammatical change.
Published online: 27 November 2003
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei
Cited by
Cited by 85 other publications
No author info given
2006. Book Reviews.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 211 ff. 
No author info given
2013.
In Quotatives,
► pp. 89 ff.
No author info given
2014.
In Language Contact, Inherited Similarity and Social Difference [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 328],
No author info given
2019.
In Heritage Languages [Studies in Bilingualism, 58],
No author info given
2020.
In Past Participle Agreement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 265],
No author info given
2021.
In Constructions in Contact 2 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 30],
Aaron, Jessi Elana
2016. The road already traveled.
Studies in Language 40:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2008. Multilingual Imperatives: The Elaboration of a Category in Northwest Amazonia.
International Journal of American Linguistics 74:2 ► pp. 189 ff.
Backus, Ad, A. Seza Doğruöz & Bernd Heine
2011. Salient stages in contact-induced grammatical change: Evidence from synchronic vs. diachronic contact situations.
Language Sciences 33:5 ► pp. 738 ff.
Bernárdez, Enrique
2019.
In Complexity Applications in Language and Communication Sciences,
► pp. 93 ff.
Beyer, Klaus
2020.
In The Handbook of Language Contact,
► pp. 649 ff.
Bouchard, Marie-Eve
2018. Subject Pronoun Expression in Santomean Portuguese.
Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 17
Catasso, Nicholas
2011. The Grammaticalization of Demonstratives: A Comparative Analysis.
Journal of Universal Language 12:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Cerruti, Massimo
2014. From Language Contact to Language Variation.
Journal of Language Contact 7:2 ► pp. 288 ff.
Cerruti, Massimo
2016. The Interplay of Variation and Change in Contact Settings, edited by Isabelle Léglise and Claudine Chamoreau.
Journal of Language Contact 9:2 ► pp. 379 ff.
Cerruti, Massimo
2020.
In Intermediate Language Varieties [Studies in Language Variation, 24],
► pp. 125 ff.
Cheng, Gong, Zhao-Hui Yi & Jian-Guo Xiong
2016. Raising or Lowering?—A Case Study of Alethic ACQ in Chinese and Southeast Asian Languages.
Studies in Chinese Linguistics 37:2 ► pp. 75 ff.
Colleman, Timothy
2018.
In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24],
► pp. 143 ff.
Colleman, Timothy & Dirk Noël
2014.
In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243],
► pp. 213 ff.
Daniels, Don
2017. A method for mitigating the problem of borrowing in syntactic reconstruction.
Studies in Language 41:3 ► pp. 577 ff.
de Smit, Merlijn
2015. Marked Subjects in Old Finnish.
Journal of Language Contact 8:2 ► pp. 299 ff.
Dékány, Éva, Katalin Gugán & Orsolya Tánczos
2020. Contact-induced change in Surgut Khanty relative clauses.
Folia Linguistica 54:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Elsig, Martin
2015.
In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 8],
► pp. 239 ff.
Fløgstad, Guro
2014.
In The Sociolinguistics of Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 154],
► pp. 117 ff.
Fricke, Hanna
2017. The rise of clause-final negation in Flores-Lembata, Eastern
Indonesia.
Linguistics in the Netherlands 34 ► pp. 47 ff.
Gaeta, Livio
2015.
In On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change [Benjamins Current Topics, 79],
► pp. 95 ff.
Gandon, Ophelie
2018.
In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],
► pp. 163 ff.
Gardani, Francesco
2018. On morphological borrowing.
Language and Linguistics Compass 12:10 ► pp. e12302 ff.
Ghafar Samar, Reza & Tej Bhatia
2017. The future of ‘future’.
Asia-Pacific Language Variation 3:2 ► pp. 130 ff.
Gibson, Hannah
2019. The grammaticalisation of verb-auxiliary order in East African Bantu.
Studies in Language 43:4 ► pp. 757 ff.
Hackert, Stephanie
2019. The perfect in English-lexifier pidgins and creoles.
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 34:2 ► pp. 195 ff.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2005.
In Language Contact and Grammatical Change,
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2020.
In The Handbook of Language Contact,
► pp. 93 ff.
Heine, Bernd & Hiroyuki Miyashita
2008. Accounting for a functional category: German drohen ‘to threaten’.
Language Sciences 30:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Heyd, Theresa & Cornelius Puschmann
2017. Hashtagging and functional shift: Adaptation and appropriation of the #.
Journal of Pragmatics 116 ► pp. 51 ff.
Hickey, Raymond
2020.
In The Handbook of Language Contact,
► pp. 1 ff.
Huang, Yang & Fuxiang Wu
2018.
In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],
► pp. 105 ff.
Höder, Steffen
2018.
In Constructions in Contact [Constructional Approaches to Language, 24],
► pp. 37 ff.
Igartua, Iván
2019. Loss of grammatical gender and language contact.
Diachronica 36:2 ► pp. 181 ff.
Inglese, Guglielmo
2019.
Variation und Wandel in der Syntax der alten indogermanischen Sprachen by Carlotta Viti.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 9:3 ► pp. 417 ff.
Kashkin, Egor & Nikita Muravyev
2021.
In Language Contact in the Territory of the Former Soviet Union [IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society, 50],
Khan, Geoffrey
2020.
In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350],
► pp. 388 ff.
KILLIE, KRISTIN
2014. The development of the Englishbe+ V-ende/V-ingperiphrasis: from emphatic to progressive marker?.
English Language and Linguistics 18:3 ► pp. 361 ff.
Kuteva, Tania & Bernd Heine
2004. On the possessive perfect in North Russian.
<i>WORD</i> 55:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.
In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,
Lenoble, Christophe
2020. Stative progressives in Inner and Outer Circle varieties of English.
World Englishes
Levey, Stephen, Karine Groulx & Joseph Roy
2013. A variationist perspective on discourse-pragmatic change in a contact setting.
Language Variation and Change 25:2 ► pp. 225 ff.
Lindström, Liina & Ilona Tragel
2010. The possessive perfect construction in Estonian.
Folia Linguistica 44:2
Lucas, Christopher
2007. Jespersen’s cycle in Arabic and Berber.
Transactions of the Philological Society 105:3 ► pp. 398 ff.
Ralph Ludwig, Steve Pagel & Peter Mühlhäusler
2018.
In Linguistic Ecology and Language Contact,
Luraghi, Silvia, Merlijn De Smit & Iván Igartua
2020. Contact-induced change in the languages of Europe: The rise and development of partitive cases and determiners in Finnic and Basque.
Linguistics 58:3 ► pp. 869 ff.
Maisak, Timur
2019. Borrowing from an unrelated language in support of intragenetic tendencies.
Diachronica 36:3 ► pp. 337 ff.
Maisak, Timur
2019. Repetitive prefix in Agul: Morphological copy from a closely related language.
International Journal of Bilingualism 23:2 ► pp. 486 ff.
Migge, Bettina & Donald Winford
2013. Fact-type complements in Gbe and the Surinamese Creoles.
Lingua 129 ► pp. 9 ff.
Mithun, Marianne
2020.
In The Handbook of Language Contact,
► pp. 593 ff.
Mobarki, Yahya Abdu A.
2020. From locative existential construction fi(ih) to a TMA/progressive marker.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 10:1 ► pp. 111 ff.
Moravcsik, Edith A.
2008. Review of Heine & Kuteva (2006): The Changing Languages of Europe.
Studies in Language 32:2 ► pp. 483 ff.
Mosegaard Hansen, Maj‑Britt
2016. Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker u. Jukka Tuominen (Hgg.): Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics.
Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 138:3
Muysken, Pieter
2016. Language contact: Trojan horse or new potential for cross-fertilization?.
Linguistic Typology 20:3
Nicolle, Steve
2018. Daniel Van Olmen, Hubert Cuyckens & Lobke Ghesquière (eds.) Aspects of grammaticalization:
(Inter)Subjectification and directionality
.
Functions of Language 25:3 ► pp. 429 ff.
Noël, Dirk
2017. The development of non-deontic be bound to in a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar perspective.
Lingua 199 ► pp. 72 ff.
Loretta O'Connor & Pieter Muysken
1920.
In The Native Languages of South America,
Papahagi, Cristiana
2016. Two New Post-Verbal Particles in Romanian: A Case of Contact-Induced Grammaticalization.
Journal of Language Contact 9:2 ► pp. 246 ff.
Puolato, Daniela, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. Langues en contact, langues en danger : une étude de cas autour de la négation verbale et autres mots-N en francoprovençal des Pouilles.
SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 13006 ff.
Salaberri, Iker
2020. Hebetic ioan gabe ene buruya: zenbait gogoeta buru hitzaren erabilera anaforikoen eta bihurkarien diakroniaz.
Fontes Linguae Vasconum :130
Sheng, Yimin
2018. 宋室南渡與臨安官話對吳語的影響 – 若干詞彙、語法的例證 (Influence of the southern migration of the Song Dynasty on Wu dialects via Lin’an Guanhua: Lexical and syntactic evidence).
Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 19:3 ► pp. 439 ff.
Siegel, Jeff
2007. Language Contact and Grammatical Change by Bernd Heine and Tania Kuteva.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 11:4 ► pp. 549 ff.
Siemund, Peter
2018.
In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61],
► pp. 133 ff.
Simango, Silvester Ron
2019.
In English in Multilingual South Africa,
► pp. 310 ff.
Sippola, Eeva
2020.
In The Handbook of Language Contact,
► pp. 453 ff.
SIPPOLA, EEVA & MARIVIC LESHO
2020. Contact-induced Grammatical Change and Independent Development in the Chabacano Creoles.
Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 97:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Sundquist, John D.
2018. A Diachronic Analysis of Light Verb Constructions in Old Swedish.
Journal of Germanic Linguistics 30:3 ► pp. 260 ff.
Szeto, Pui Yiu, Stephen Matthews & Virginia Yip
2019. Bilingual children as “laboratories” for studying contact outcomes: Development of perfective aspect.
Linguistics 57:3 ► pp. 693 ff.
Tragel, Ilona, Külli Habicht & Piret Piiroja
2015.
In Causation, Permission, and Transfer [Studies in Language Companion Series, 167],
► pp. 353 ff.
Turan, Dilek, Elena Antonova-Ünlü, Çiğdem Sağın-Şimşek & Mehmet Akkuş
2020. Looking for contact-induced language change: Converbs in heritage Turkish.
International Journal of Bilingualism 24:5-6 ► pp. 1035 ff.
Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet & Lobke Ghesquière
2015.
In On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change [Benjamins Current Topics, 79],
► pp. 1 ff.
Viti, Carlotta
2015.
In Perspectives on Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 169],
► pp. 1 ff.
Vossen, Frens & Johan van der Auwera
2014.
In The Diachrony of Negation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 160],
► pp. 47 ff.
Willis, David
2007. Syntactic lexicalization as a new type of degrammaticalization.
Linguistics 45:2
Yakpo, Kofi & Pieter Muysken
2014.
In Pidgins and Creoles beyond Africa-Europe Encounters [Creole Language Library, 47],
► pp. 101 ff.
Zhou, Yang
2018. Exploring the emergence of the postverbal sin1
先 in Cantonese.
Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 19:2 ► pp. 333 ff.
Ziegeler, Debra
2014. Replica grammaticalisation as recapitulation.
Diachronica 31:1 ► pp. 106 ff.
Ziegeler, Debra
2020. Changes in the functions of already in Singapore English.
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 35:2 ► pp. 293 ff.
고창수 & 조서형
2016. Chinese Adpositon Replication to Korean Postpostion.
Language & Information Society 29:null ► pp. 5 ff.
안미경
2018. Language Contact and Grammaticalization: A Case of English Concessive Prepositions.
Discourse and Cognition 25:4 ► pp. 77 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.