Review published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 28:1 (2004) ► pp. 237–246
Book review

Asa Kasher (ed.). Pragmatics: Critical Concepts
London: Routledge, 1998. ISBN 0-415-11734-8boxed set

Reviewed by
| Fujian Normal University
Published online: 05 May 2004
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.28.1.13xie
References
Beeching, Kate
2002 Gender, politeness and pragmatic particles in French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1977 Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brisard, Frank
2002 “Grice”. In: Verschueren, Jef; Ostman, Jan-Ola; Blommaert, Jan; and Bulcaen, Chris (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics 2000 installment, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope; and Levinson, Stephen C.
1987 Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
2001 “Sociolinguistics”. In: Aronoff, Mark; and Rees-Miller, Janie (eds.), The handbook of linguistics, 563–581. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino
2001 A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Eerdmans, Susan L.; Prevignano, Carlo L.; and Thibault, Paul J.
(eds.) 2003 Language and interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Foster-Cohen, Susan
2000 Review of Asa Kasher (1998). Studies in Second Language Acquisition 221: 120–122.Google Scholar
Haberland, Hartmut; and Mey, Jacob L.
2002 Editorial: Linguistics and pragmatics, 25 years after. Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1671–1682.Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele
2000 “Data collection in pragmatics research”. In: Spencer-Oately, Helen (ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures 316–341. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L.
2001 Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd edition). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mills, Sara
2003 Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morin, Edgar
2002 La méthode: la nature de lature (Chinese version translated by Hongmiao Wu and Xuejun Feng). Peking: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor; Schegloff, Emanuel A.; and Thompson, Sandra A.
(eds.) 1996 Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan
2002 “Charles Morris”. In: Verschueren, Jef; Ostman, Jan-Ola; Blommaert, Jan; and Bulcaen, Chris (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics 2000 installment, 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Prevignano, Carlo L.; and di Luzio, Aldo
2003 “A discussion with John J. Gumperz”. In: Eerdmans, Susan L.; Prevignano, Carlo L.; and Thibault, Paul J. (eds.), Language and interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz, 7–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Prevignano, Carlo L.; and Thibault, Paul J.
(eds.) 2003 Discussing conversation analysis: The work of Emanuel A. Schegloff. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1998 “Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction”. Language and Speech 411: 235–263.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret; and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
(eds.) 2001 Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria
2002 “On the telephone again! Telephone conversation openings in Greek”. In: Luke, Kang Kwong; and Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula (eds.), Telephone calls: Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures, 49–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sakita, Tomoko I.
2002 Reporting discourse, tense, and cognition. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Stamenov, Maxim I.
2003 Quo Vadis, pragmatics? Alternative conceptions in making sense of a heterogeneous discipline. Journal of Pragmatics 351: 263–297.Google Scholar
Turner, Ken
1999 Review of Jacob L. Mey (1998). Journal of Linguistics 351: 634–639.Google Scholar
2000 Review of Asa Kasher (1998). Linguistics 381: 199–205.Google Scholar
2002 A note on the Neo-Gricean foundations of societal pragmatics. International Journal of Pragmatics 121: 1–17.Google Scholar
Vanderveken, Daniel; and Kubo, Susmu
(eds.) 2002 Essays in speech act theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1999 Understanding pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Wenger, Etienne
1998 Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Xie, Chaoqun
2003a Review of John E. Joseph et al. (2001). Applied Linguistics 241: 260–266.Google Scholar
2003b Review of Gino Eelen (2001). Journal of Pragmatics 351: 811–818.Google Scholar
Xie, Chaoqun; and Lin, Dajin
2003 Review of Rosina Márquez Reiter (2000). Studies in Language 271: 682–690.Google Scholar