The participial construction of Dolakhā Newar
Syntactic implications of an Asian converb
The terms “(clause) chaining” and “converbal constructions” are used for the classification of similar types of clause linkage. Chaining is generally used for constructions which do not entail subordination, while converbs are defined as subordinate. In Dolakhā Newar adverbial and “participial” clauses are not syntactically distinct, but neither are they subordinate. I propose that the term “converb” be redefined as a clause-linkage strategy that subsumes adverbial clauses and clauses akin to the Dolakhāe “participial”, and that there be no requirement that converbs be either subordinate or adverbial. I provide an analysis of “case prolepsis”, the casemarking of an argument by a verb in a non-adjacent clause, and argue that this results from the participial construction applying at a distinct level of clause structure.
Published online: 11 March 2005
Cited by 16 other publications
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
Clancy, Patricia M.
Gawne, Lauren & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
Jendraschek, Gerd & Yongmin Shin
Overall, Simon E.
Sarvasy, Hannah S. & Soonja Choi
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.