Article published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 31:2 (2007) ► pp.293–326
Relative Clauses in English conversation
Relativizers, frequency, and the notion of construction
This paper is a usage-based study of the grammar of that set of English Relative Clauses with which a relativizer has been described as optional. We argue that the regularities in the use of relativizers in English can be seen as systematically arising from pragmatic-prosodic factors, creating frequency effects, resulting in some cases highly grammaticized formats: the more the Main Clause and the Relative Clause are integrated with each other, that is, approach monoclausal status, the more likely we are to find no relativizer used; conversely, the more separate the two clauses are, the more likely we are to find an overt relativizer. These findings have led us to suggest that the more monoclausal combinations have become unitary storage and processing chunks. We thus see these findings as a contribution not only to our understanding of Relative Clauses, but to our understanding of syntactic organization in general and of the nature of the grammatical practices in which speakers engage in everyday interactions.
Cited by
Cited by 49 other publications
AMBRIDGE, BEN, EVAN KIDD, CAROLINE F. ROWLAND & ANNA L. THEAKSTON
2015. The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 42:2 ► pp. 239 ff. 
Auer, Peter & Stefan Pfänder
2011. Constructions: Emergent or emerging ?. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ► pp. 1 ff.
Auran, Cyril & Rudy Loock
2011. The prosody of discourse functions: The case of appositive relative clauses in spoken British English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7:2
Boas, Hans C. & Francisco Gonzálvez-García
2014. Chapter 1. Applying constructional concepts to Romance languages. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 1 ff.
Checa-Garcia, Irene
2019. Resumptive elements in Spanish relative clauses and processing difficulties: A multifactorial analysis. Folia Linguistica 53:2 ► pp. 479 ff.
Cohen, Eran
2016. The modern Hebrew prepositional relative clause strategy. Studies in Language 40:4 ► pp. 733 ff.
Colovic‐Markovic, Jelena
2018. Teaching Relative Clauses. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 1 ff.
De Stefani, Elwys & Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
2017. Une étude interactionnelle de la grammaire : la dislocation à droite évaluative dans la parole-en-interaction. Revue française de linguistique appliquée Vol. XXII:2 ► pp. 15 ff.
Diessel, Holger
2019. The Grammar Network,
Diessel, Holger
2020. A Dynamic Network Approach to the Study of Syntax. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Florian Jaeger, T.
2010. Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology 61:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Frizelle, Pauline & Paul Fletcher
2014. Profiling relative clause constructions in children with specific language impairment. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 28:6 ► pp. 437 ff.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2011. Review of Leino (2008): Constructional Reorganization. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9:2 ► pp. 419 ff.
Grafmiller, Jason, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Lars Hinrichs
2018. Restricting the restrictive relativizer. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14:2 ► pp. 309 ff.
Hofmeister, Philip, T. Florian Jaeger, Inbal Arnon, Ivan A. Sag & Neal Snider
2013. The source ambiguity problem: Distinguishing the effects of grammar and processing on acceptability judgments. Language and Cognitive Processes 28:1-2 ► pp. 48 ff.
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2015. A multiple-grammar model of speakers’ linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Khachaturyan, Maria
2023. Mano correlatives are non-subordinating. Mandenkan :70 ► pp. 3 ff.
Kidd, Evan
2015. Incorporating learning into theories of parsing. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5:4 ► pp. 487 ff.
Kim, Wonseok & Seok-Chae Rhee
2020. Factor Analysis on Subject Relativizer Alternation. English Studies 101:2 ► pp. 214 ff.
Kurumada, Chigusa & T. Florian Jaeger
2015. Communicative efficiency in language production: Optional case-marking in Japanese. Journal of Memory and Language 83 ► pp. 152 ff.
Lester, Nicholas A.
Lili, Zhang & Zhang Chun
2021. Why do L2 learners choose the implicit marker for object relative clauses when it is optionally explicit?. Lingua 258 ► pp. 103097 ff.
Liu, Jinlu & Haitao Liu
2021. A quantitative investigation of the ellipsis of English relativizers. Linguistics Vanguard 7:1
Maschler, Yael
2018. The on-line emergence of Hebrew insubordinateshe- (‘that/which/who’) clauses. Studies in Language 42:3 ► pp. 669 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2020. Chapter 4. The insubordinate – subordinate continuum. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 87 ff.
McDonnell, Bradley
2020. Chapter 10. The pragmatics of ‘light nouns’ in Besemah. In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128], ► pp. 238 ff.
Nascimento, Thiago Da Cunha & Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
2023. Linguística Interacional. Revista Linguagem em Foco 15:1 ► pp. 274 ff.
Nitschke, Sanjo, Ludovica Serratrice & Evan Kidd
2014. The effect of linguistic nativeness on structural priming in comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29:5 ► pp. 525 ff.
NORCLIFFE, ELISABETH & T. FLORIAN JAEGER
2016. Predicting head-marking variability in Yucatec Maya relative clause production. Language and Cognition 8:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona & Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
2013. The patching-together of pivot patterns in talk-in-interaction: On ⿿double dislocations⿿ in French. Journal of Pragmatics 54 ► pp. 92 ff.
Raymond, Chase Wesley
2019. Intersubjectivity, Normativity, and Grammar. Social Psychology Quarterly 82:2 ► pp. 182 ff.
Roland, Douglas, Frederic Dick & Jeffrey L. Elman
2007. Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language 57:3 ► pp. 348 ff.
Scheibman, Joanne
2014. Grammar in Spoken and Written English. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Scheibman, Joanne
2014. Referentiality, predicate patterns, and functions ofwe-utterances in American English interactions. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 23 ff.
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria & Simona Pekarek Doehler
2020. Chapter 11. Relative-clause increments and the management of reference. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 303 ff.
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria, Simona Pekarek Doehler & Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
2020. Chapter 3. Emergent complex noun phrases. In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128], ► pp. 44 ff.
Su, Danjie
2017. Semantics and chunking in written and conversational discourses. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 8:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Sun, Chao Fen
2014. The pragmatics of the Chinese nominal marker de 的. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 5:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Thompson, Sandra A. & Tsuyoshi Ono
2020. Chapter 1. Introduction. In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128], ► pp. 2 ff.
Visapää, Laura
2014. On the contextual conceptualization of joka relative clauses in Finnish. In Contexts of Subordination [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 249], ► pp. 147 ff.
ZIMA, ELISABETH & GEERT BRÔNE
2015. Cognitive Linguistics and interactional discourse: time to enter into dialogue. Language and Cognition 7:4 ► pp. 485 ff.
감경아 & Hyeson Park
2008. Relative Clause Reduction in Research Article Abstracts: Native vs. Non-native Writers Compared. English Language and Linguistics null:25 ► pp. 1 ff.
신은영
2016. Variation in the Choice of Relativizers in Interlanguage of Korean EFL Learners. English21 29:2 ► pp. 447 ff.
장은영
2014. A Corpus-based Analysis on the Factors Conditioning the Selection of Relative Pronoun That and Which in Newspaper. Studies in Linguistics null:33 ► pp. 357 ff.
장은영 & 김경열
2015. Relative Pronouns as an Accessibility Marker in Discourse. The Jungang Journal of English Language and Literature 57:1 ► pp. 501 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2015. Références bibliographiques. In La dislocation à droite revisitée [Champs linguistiques, ], ► pp. 261 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.