Cover not available
Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 31:2 (2007) ► pp.508–523
Book review

Randall S. Gess & Edward J. Rubin (eds.). Theoretical and experimental approaches to Romance linguistics. Selected papers from the 34th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Salt Lake City, March 2004. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins, 2005. . [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 272]. viii, 367 pp.

Reviewed by
| University of Munich (LMU)
Published online: 6 April 2007
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.2.15duf
References (27)
References
Alonso-Ovalle, Luis and Elena Guerzoni. 2004. Double negatives, negative concord and metalinguistic negation. Papers from the 38th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society 11: 15–31. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Azevedo, Milton M. 2005. Portuguese. A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: CUP.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barry, William J. et al. 2003. Do rhythm measures tell us anything about language type? Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona 2003, 2693–2696.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2004. Structuring sense. Vol. 11: In name only. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Frequency effects on French liaison. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, Joan Bybee and Paul J. Hopper (eds.), 337–359. Amsterdam: Benjamins [Typological Studies in Language 451]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 61: 339–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chitoran, Ioana. 2001. The phonology of Romanian. A constraint-based approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter [Studies in Generative Grammar 561].Google Scholar
. 2002. The phonology and morphology of Romanian diphthongization. Probus 141: 205–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin; David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka. 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Encrevé, Pierre. 1988. La liaison avec et sans enchaînement. Phonologie tridimensionnelle et usages du français. Paris: Seuil [Travaux linguistiques].Google Scholar
Flege, James E. and Wieke Eefting. 1987. Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics 151: 67–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flemming, Edward S. 2002. Auditory representations in phonology. New York NY: Routledge [Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics].Google Scholar
Lin, Vivian I-Wen. 2002. Coordination and sharing at the interfaces. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 1998. Sintassi comparata dell’accordo participiale romanzo. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier [Linguistica 171].Google Scholar
Low, Ee Ling and Esther Grabe. 1995. Prosodic patterns in Singapore English. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm, Vol. III1: 636–639.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. Papers in Optimality Theory, Jill Beckman; Laura Walsh Dickey and Suzanne Urbanczyk. 249–384. Amherst MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association [University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 181].Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina and Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris [Studies in Generative Grammar 281].Google Scholar
Penny, Ralph J. 1969. El habla pasiega. Ensayo de dialectología montañesa. London: Tamesis.Google Scholar
1978. Estudio estructural del habla de Tudanca. Tübingen: Niemeyer [Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie; Beihefte 1671]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1945. The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1988. Il sintagma preposizionale. Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, Lorenzo Renzi (ed.), Vol. 11, 508–531. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, Liliane M. Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R. 1969. Guess who? Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 252–286. Chicago IL: University of Chicago, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Cristina and Alan Munn. 2003. The syntax and semantics of bare arguments in Brazilian Portuguese. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 21: 185–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spinelli, Elsa; James McQueen and Anne Cutler. 2003. Processing resyllabified words in French. Journal of Memory and Language 481: 233–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique. 1996. Clitic constructions. Phrase structure and the lexicon, Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring (eds.), 213–276. Dordrecht: Kluwer [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 331]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasow, Thomas and Jennifer Arnold. 2005. Intuitions in linguistic argumentation. Lingua 1151: 1481–1496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar