Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 32:2 (2008) ► pp.447456
Allan, Keith
1986Linguistic meaning. 21 vols. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Reprint edn, Beijing: World Publishing Corporation 1991.Google Scholar
1991Cooperative principle. In Oxford international encyclopedia of linguistics, ed. by William Bright. Vol. 11, 310–11. New York NY: OUP. Revised 2002.Google Scholar
1994Speech act classification and definition. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Vol. 81, Ronald E. Asher (ed.) 4124–7 Oxford: Pergamon. Revised versions in (1) Concise encyclopedia of the philosophy of language, Peter Lamarque (ed.), Oxford: Elsevier Science 1997 (2) Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics, Jacob L. Mey (ed.). Oxford: Elsevier Science 1998.Google Scholar
2001Natural language semantics. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2007The western classical tradition in linguistics. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent & Robert M. Harnish
1979Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
1978Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction, Esther N. Goody (ed.), 56–289. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
2001 Sabar, iklas, setia  – patient, sincere, loyal? Contrastive semantics of some ‘virtues’ in Malay and English. Journal of Pragmatics 331: 653–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka
(eds) 1994Semantic and lexical universals: Theory and empirical findings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2002Meaning and universal grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics 31: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press. Reprinted in H. Paul Grice. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press 1986.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1967Transitivity and theme in English, Parts 1–2. Journal of Linguistics 31: 37–81 & 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1968Transitivity and theme in English, Part 3. Journal of Linguistics 41: 179–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Junker, Marie-Odile & Louise Blacksmith
2006Are there emotional universals? Evidence from the Native American language East Cree. Culture and Psychology 121: 275–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montolío, Estrella
1993“Si me lo permiten …” Gramática y pragmática: sobre algunas estructuras condicionales regulativas en español. Aproximaciones pragmalingüísticas al español, Henk Haverkate, Kees Hengeveld & Gijs Mulder (eds.), 119–47. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Moore, George E.
1952A reply to my critics. In The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, 2nd edn, Paul A. Schilpp (ed.), 533–687. New York NY: Tudor.Google Scholar
Travis, Catherine
2003The semantics of the Spanish subjunctive: Its use in the natural semantic metalanguage. Cognitive Linguistics 141: 47–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1972Semantic primitives. Berlin: Athenaum.Google Scholar
1980Lingua mentalis: The semantics of natural language. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1988The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David P.
1996From part to person: Natural tendencies of semantic change and the search for cognates. The comparative method reviewed: Regularity and irregularity in language change, Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds.), 264–304. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar