A reconsideration of the motivations for preferred argument structure
Previous studies on Preferred Argument Structure have suggested (Du Bois 1987, 2002) and accepted (e.g. Goldberg 2004) specific cognitive motivations for PAS, namely that the general restriction of lexical arguments and new referents to the S and O roles facilitates the conceptually onerous task of referent introduction. In this paper, conversation data from English and Portuguese are analyzed. The data are generally inconsistent with the putative cognitive motivations for PAS presented in the literature. They suggest instead that PAS is most likely epiphenomenal and due to basic semantic and pragmatic factors, for example the correlation between human referents and given/non-lexical arguments, and the correlation between human referents and the A role.
Published online: 19 January 2009
Cited by 10 other publications
Ariel, Mira, Elitzur Dattner, John W. Du Bois & Tal Linzen
Brickell, Timothy C. & Stefan Schnell
Haig, Geoffrey, Stefan Schnell, Claudia Wegener, Geoffrey Haig, Nicole Nau, Stefan Schnell & Claudia Wegener
Hodge, Gabrielle, Lindsay N. Ferrara & Benjamin D. Anible
Jiang, Xiangyu & Liang Chen
Seržant, Ilja A., Katarzyna Maria Janic, Darja Dermaku & Oneg Ben Dror
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.