Review published In:
Studies in Language
Vol. 33:3 (2009) ► pp.719726
References (8)
References
Cuxas, Christian. 2000. La langue des signes française; les voies de l’iconicité. Paris: OphrysGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta. 2004. Etude typologique de l’expression de l’esapce: Localisation et déplacement en français et en polonaise. Thèse de doctorat, Université du Québec à Montréal.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen & Penelope Brown. 1994. Immanuel Kant among the Tenejapans. Anthropology as experimental philosophy. Ethos 221: 3–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1996. Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. Language and space, Paul Bloom; Mary A. Petersen; Lynn Nadel & Merrill F. Garrett (eds.). 109–169. Cambridge MA: The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Space and language and cognition. Exploration in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, John (ed.). 2002. The linguistics of sitting, standing and lying. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ozanne-Rivierre, Francoise. 1997. L’orientation spatiale dans quelques langues austronésiennes. Diversité des langues et representations cognitives, Catherine Fuchs & Stephane Robert (eds.), 81–92. Paris: OphrysGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan & Peerapat Yangklang. 2004. A third way to travel: The place of Thai and serial verb languages in motion event typology. Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives, Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), 159–190. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar