Article published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 34:2 (2010) ► pp.239–272
Topicality and differential object marking
Evidence from Romance and beyond
The present paper investigates the relationship between dislocation and differential object marking in some Romance languages. As in many languages that have a DOM system, it is usually also assumed that in Romance languages the phenomenon is regulated by the semantic features of the referents, such as animacy, definiteness, and specificity. In the languages under investigation, though, these features cannot explain the distribution and the emergence of DOM. After discussing the main theoretical approaches to the phenomenon, I will analyse DOM in four Romance languages. I will argue that DOM emerges in pragmatically and semantically marked contexts, namely with personal pronouns in dislocations. I will then show that in these languages the use of the DOM system is mainly motivated by the need to signal the markedness of these direct objects as a consequence of being used in (mainly left) dislocation as topics (cf. English “As for him, we didn’t see him”). Finally, the examination of comparative data from Persian and Amazonian languages lends further support to the advocated approach in terms of information structure
Cited by
Cited by 48 other publications
Andriani, Luigi, Roberta D'Alessandro, Alberto Frasson, Brechje van Osch, Luana Sorgini & Silvia Terenghi
2022. Adding the microdimension to the study of language change in contact. Three case studies. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1 
Arkadiev, Peter M. & Yakov G. Testelets
Belletti, Adriana
2018. Chapter 3. Objects and subjects in the left periphery. In Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 252], ► pp. 57 ff.
Belletti, Adriana
2022. a-Topics in Italian/Romance and the Cartography of Children’s Inventions. Probus 34:1 ► pp. 9 ff.
Capistrán Garza, Alejandra
Chappell, Hilary
Chappell, Hilary & Jean‐Christophe Verstraete
2019. Optional and alternating case marking: Typology and diachrony. Language and Linguistics Compass 13:3 ► pp. e12311 ff.
Coghill, Eleanor
2018. Chapter 11. Information structure in the Neo-Aramaic dialect of Telkepe. In Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series, 199], ► pp. 297 ff.
Cuza, Alejandro, Jian Jiao & Julio César López-Otero
2018. Does Typological Proximity Really Matter? Evidence from Mandarin and Brazilian Portuguese-Speaking Learners of Spanish. Languages 3:2 ► pp. 13 ff.
Della Putta, Paolo
2016. THE EFFECTS OF TEXTUAL ENHANCEMENT ON THE ACQUISITION OF TWO NONPARALLEL GRAMMATICAL FEATURES BY SPANISH-SPEAKING LEARNERS OF ITALIAN. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38:2 ► pp. 217 ff.
Diessel, Holger
2019. The Grammar Network,
Elisa Zampieri, Francesca Meneghello, Giulia Bencini & Ludovico Franco
2013. On the Production of Axial Prepositions: Linking Figure and Ground in Broca’s Aphasia: A Case Study. Language & Information Society 19:null ► pp. 61 ff.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, Lena Ibnbari & Sharon Taube
2013. Missing objects as Topic Drop. Lingua 136 ► pp. 145 ff.
García-Miguel, José M.
2015. Variable coding and object alignment in Spanish: A corpus-based approach. Folia Linguistica 49:1
Grossman, Eitan
2018. Did Greek Influence the Coptic Preference for Prefixing? A Quantitative-Typological Perspective. Journal of Language Contact 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Irimia, Monica Alexandrina
2020. Variation in differential object marking: On some differences between Spanish and Romanian. Open Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 424 ff.
Irimia, Monica Alexandrina
2021. Oblique differential object marking and types of nominals. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 66:4 ► pp. 486 ff.
Irimia, Monica Alexandrina & Anna Pineda
Khouja, Marta
Kizilkaya, Semra, Zarina Levy-Forsythe & Klaus von Heusinger
2022. Affectedness and Differential Object Marking in Turkish and Uzbek. Linguistics 60:6 ► pp. 1907 ff.
Kuo, Pei-Jung
2022. The idiosyncratic preposition zai in Mandarin Chinese and differential argument marking. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 9:2 ► pp. 232 ff.
Leal, Tania
2018. Chapter 2. Mapping at external interfaces. In Meaning and Structure in Second Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism, 55], ► pp. 35 ff.
Ledgeway, Adam, Norma Schifano & Giuseppina Silvestri
2019. Differential Object Marking and the properties of D in the dialects of the extreme south of Italy. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1
Levshina, Natalia
2021. Cross-Linguistic Trade-Offs and Causal Relationships Between Cues to Grammatical Subject and Object, and the Problem of Efficiency-Related Explanations. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Levshina, Natalia
2021. Communicative efficiency and differential case marking: a reverse-engineering approach. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s3
Luraghi, Silvia
2011. The locative syntax of experiencers, by Idan Landau. Linguistic Typology 15:1
Luraghi, Silvia
2017. Differential Goal marking vs. differential Source marking in Ancient Greek. In Space in Diachrony [Studies in Language Companion Series, 188], ► pp. 119 ff.
Malchukov, Andrej L.
Manzini, M. Rita & Ludovico Franco
2016. Goal and DOM datives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34:1 ► pp. 197 ff.
Mardale, Alexandru & Silvina Montrul
2020. Introduction. In The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 26], ► pp. 1 ff.
Mardale, Alexandru & Silvina Montrul
2020. Introduction. In The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 26], ► pp. 1 ff.
McDonnell, Bradley
2023. Universal quantifiers, focus, and grammatical relations in Besemah. Studies in Language 47:2 ► pp. 422 ff.
Mithun, Marianne
2019. Grammatical relations in Hiligaynon. In Argument Selectors [Typological Studies in Language, 123], ► pp. 131 ff.
Moezipour, Farhad
2015. Information-structural encoding of recipient in non-canonical alignments of Persian. In Causation, Permission, and Transfer [Studies in Language Companion Series, 167], ► pp. 463 ff.
Moezzipour, Farhad & Seyyed Ali Ostovar-Namaghi
2023.
Ra-centric constructions at Persian left-periphery: an RRG account. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 0:0
Nikitina, Tatiana
2018. Chapter 7. Focus marking and differential argument marking. In Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series, 199], ► pp. 195 ff.
Onea, Edgar
2023. Virginia Hill and Alexandru Mardale: The diachrony of Differential Object Marking in Romanian
. Folia Linguistica 57:1 ► pp. 227 ff.
Onea, Edgar & Alexandru Mardale
2020. From topic to object: Grammaticalization of differential object marking in Romanian. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 65:3 ► pp. 350 ff.
Pires, Aline Jéssica
2020. A influência da gramática espanhola na Marcação Diferencial de Objeto no português diacrônico. Cadernos de Linguística 1:2 ► pp. 01 ff.
Requena, Pablo E.
Schnell, Stefan & Danielle Barth
2018. Discourse motivations for pronominal and zero objects across registers in Vera'a. Language Variation and Change 30:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Shain, Cory & Judith Tonhauser
2010. The synchrony and diachrony of differential object marking in Paraguayan Guaraní. Language Variation and Change 22:3 ► pp. 321 ff.
Silvestri, Giuseppina
2016. Adverb and participle agreement. In Theoretical Approaches to Linguistic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 234], ► pp. 89 ff.
Silvestri, Giuseppina
2017. Chapter 6. Adverb agreement in the dialects of the Lausberg Area . In Adjective Adverb Interfaces in Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 242], ► pp. 173 ff.
Tal, Shira, Kenny Smith, Jennifer Culbertson, Eitan Grossman & Inbal Arnon
2022. The Impact of Information Structure on the Emergence of Differential Object Marking: An Experimental Study. Cognitive Science 46:3
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena
Xu, Dan
Zúñiga, Fernando
2018. The diachrony of morphosyntactic alignment. Language and Linguistics Compass 12:9 ► pp. e12300 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.