In some (numeral) classifier languages, a classifier may occur “bare” (i.e. with a noun but without a numeral) and the nominal expression receives a definite interpretation. On the basis of evidence from Cantonese and Mandarin Chinese, Cheng and Sybesma (1999) hypothesize that classifier languages exhibit either the bare classifier or the bare noun pattern for definite reference, but not both. To evaluate this hypothesis against more typologically diverse languages, a parallel elicitation study of three non-Sinitic languages was conducted — Vietnamese, Hmong and Bangla — as well as two geographical varieties of Cantonese, focusing on the definite interpretation of bare classifier and bare noun patterns. The results show that although the use of bare classifier patterns for definite reference is a cross-linguistically connected phenomenon, there is more variation than previously described in the alternation between definite bare classifier and bare noun patterns, and that the preference for one pattern over another may receive functional/ pragmatic explanations.
2022. Language Interfaces in Adult Heritage Language Acquisition: A Study on Encoding of Nominal Reference in Mandarin Chinese as a Heritage Language. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Julie Jiang, L.
2015. 量詞語言中定指不定指的標記方式. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 8:2 ► pp. 319 ff.
Kalin, Laura
2018. Licensing and Differential Object Marking: The View from Neo‐Aramaic. Syntax 21:2 ► pp. 112 ff.
Kayne, Richard S.
2017. English One and Ones as Complex Determiners. In Perspectives on the Architecture and Acquisition of Syntax, ► pp. 77 ff.
Kim, Min-Joo
2023. Anaphoric definiteness marking in Korean: focusing on subject definites. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 32:3 ► pp. 373 ff.
2020. Episodic versus generic eventualities and nominals. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:4 ► pp. 441 ff.
Li, Yu
2023. Referentiality and thematic importance: The discourse functions of Zauzou classifiers. Lingua 285 ► pp. 103477 ff.
Moroney, Mary
2021. Updating the typology of definiteness: Evidence from bare nouns in Shan. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1
Pichetpan, Nitipong & Mark W. Post
2021. Bare classifier phrases in Thai and other mainland Asian languages: implications for classifier theory and typology. Linguistic Typology 25:3 ► pp. 461 ff.
Simpson, Andrew
2017. Bare classifier/noun alternations in the Jinyun (Wu) variety of Chinese and the encoding of definiteness
. Linguistics 55:2 ► pp. 305 ff.
Simpson, Andrew & Binh Ngo
2018. Classifier syntax in Vietnamese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 27:3 ► pp. 211 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.