This paper critically discusses and contrasts some of the different conceptualisations of transitivity that have been presented in the literature, and argues that transitivity as a morphosyntactic phenomenon and effectiveness of an event as a semantic concept should be separated in discussions of transitivity, and also, like many other aspects of grammar, transitivity should be seen as a constructional phenomenon, and so each construction in a language needs to be examined separately, in natural contexts. An Appendix presents some general questions one can consider when analysing language data.
2023. Methodology: Meditations of a Philosophical Buddhologist. In Guruparamparā. Studies on Buddhism, India, Tibet and More in Honour of Professor Marek Mejor,
2019. The Emergence of Expressible Agency and Irony in Today’s China: A Semantic Explanation of the NewBèi-construction. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Heaton, Raina
2018. Intransitivizing morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass 12:12
Legallois, Dominique
2017. Pour une conception constructionnelle de la transitivité. Langue française N° 194:2 ► pp. 15 ff.
2014. The Study on the Telicity in Korean Verbs. Language & Information Society 21:null ► pp. 23 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.