A typology of complement insubordination in Dutch
Jean-Christophe Verstraete | University of Leuven (JCV, SD, AVL) and Research Foundation — Flanders / FWO (AVL)
This paper presents an analysis of complement insubordination in Dutch, i.e. structures that are formally marked as subordinate complement clauses but conventionally used as main clauses. We develop a typology of seven distinct construction types (in three semantic domains), none of which have been analyzed in detail before. From a more general perspective, we show that insubordinate constructions provide a fresh perspective on the analysis of modality and evaluation, with semantic parameters that are not found in more typical exponents like modal verbs. In addition, we show that it is difficult to develop a schematic generalization across the different construction types, in spite of their apparent formal similarity as complement structures. We argue that this points to separate developmental trajectories for the different types, with a point of origin in different main-subordinate constructions, and different degrees of conventionalization for the resulting insubordinate constructions.
Keywords: insubordination, constructions, evaluation, modality, Dutch
Published online: 14 May 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.1.04ver
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.36.1.04ver
Cited by
Cited by 31 other publications
Cappelle, Bert & Ilse Depraetere
2016. Short-circuited interpretations of modal verb constructions.
Constructions and Frames 8:1 ► pp. 7 ff. 
Catasso, Nicholas
2018. Die Janusköpfigkeit des ahd. Konnektors wanta und ihre Relevanz für die korpusbasierte historische Syntaxforschung.
Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 46:2 ► pp. 248 ff.
Catasso, Nicholas
2021. Some notes on central causal clauses in Venetian.
Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 57:4 ► pp. 519 ff.
Cresti, Emanuela
2014.
In Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 61],
► pp. 365 ff.
D'Hertefelt, Sarah
2017.
In Imperatives and Directive Strategies [Studies in Language Companion Series, 184],
D’Hertefelt, Sarah & Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2014. Independent complement constructions in Swedish and Danish: Insubordination or dependency shift?.
Journal of Pragmatics 60 ► pp. 89 ff.
Evans, Nicholas & Honoré Watanabe
2016.
In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115],
► pp. 1 ff.
Fried, Mirjam & Pavel Machač
2022. Intonation as a cue to epistemic stance in one type of insubordinate clauses.
Folia Linguistica 0:0
Fried, Mirjam & Pavel Machač
2022. Intonation as a cue to epistemic stance in one type of insubordinate clauses.
Folia Linguistica 56:1 ► pp. 183 ff.
Gras, Pedro
2016.
In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115],
► pp. 113 ff.
Gras, Pedro & María Sol Sansiñena
2017. Exclamatives in the functional typology of insubordination: Evidence from complement insubordinate constructions in Spanish.
Journal of Pragmatics 115 ► pp. 21 ff.
Gras, Pedro & María Sol Sansiñena
2020. Un caso de variación pragmático-discursiva: que inicial en tres variedades dialectales del español.
Romanistisches Jahrbuch 71:1 ► pp. 271 ff.
Gras, Pedro & María Sol Sansiñena
2015. An interactional account of discourse-connective que-constructions in Spanish.
Text & Talk 35:4
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck & Tania Kuteva
2016.
In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115],
► pp. 39 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2016.
In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178],
► pp. 341 ff.
Lastres-López, Cristina
2020. Beyond conditionality: On the pragmaticalization of interpersonal if-constructions in English conversation.
Journal of Pragmatics 157 ► pp. 68 ff.
Looij, Matthijs & Diana Minnaert
2019. Alsof ik nazi ben!.
Nederlandse Taalkunde
23:3 ► pp. 359 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2018. The on-line emergence of Hebrew insubordinate she- (‘that/which/who’) clauses.
Studies in Language 42:3 ► pp. 669 ff.
Maschler, Yael
2020.
In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32],
► pp. 87 ff.
McGregor, William B.
2017. There’s grammar and there’s grammar just as there’s usage and there’s usage.
English Text Construction 10:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
McGregor, William B.
2019. Reported speech as a dedicated grammatical domain – and why defenestration should not be thrown out the window.
Linguistic Typology 23:1 ► pp. 207 ff.
Mithun, Marianne
2019. Categorial shift: foundations, extensions, and consequences.
Language Sciences 73 ► pp. 10 ff.
Pérez Fernández, Sofía, Pedro Gras & Frank Brisard
2021. Semantic polyfunctionality and constructional networks.
Constructions and Frames 13:1 ► pp. 82 ff.
Sansiñena, María Sol, Hendrik De Smet & Bert Cornillie
2015. Between subordinate and insubordinate. Paths toward complementizer-initial main clauses.
Journal of Pragmatics 77 ► pp. 3 ff.
Sansiñena, María Sol, Hendrik De Smet & Bert Cornillie
2015. Displaced directives: Subjunctive free-standing que-clauses vs. imperatives in Spanish.
Folia Linguistica 49:1
Spronck, Stef
2017. Defenestration: deconstructing the frame-in relation in Ungarinyin.
Journal of Pragmatics 114 ► pp. 104 ff.
TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH CLOSS
2017. ‘Insubordination’ in the light of the Uniformitarian Principle.
English Language and Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 289 ff.
Van linden, An
2021. A usage-based approach to counterfactuality: optionality of the apodosis.
Theoretical Linguistics 47:3-4 ► pp. 277 ff.
Van linden, An & Freek Van de Velde
2014. (Semi-)autonomous subordination in Dutch: Structures and semantic–pragmatic values.
Journal of Pragmatics 60 ► pp. 226 ff.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe & Sarah D'Hertefelt
2016.
In Insubordination [Typological Studies in Language, 115],
► pp. 65 ff.
Nuria Yáñez-Bouza, Emma Moore, Linda van Bergen & Willem B. Hollmann
2019.
In Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.