Article published in:Theory and data in cognitive linguistics
Edited by Nikolas Gisborne and Willem B. Hollmann
[Studies in Language 36:3] 2012
► pp. 477–510
Frequencies, probabilities, and association measures in usage-/exemplar-based linguistics
Some necessary clarifications
In the last few years, a particular quantitative approach to the syntax-lexis interface has been developed: collostructional analysis (CA). This approach is an application of association measures to co-occurrence data from corpora, from a usage-based/cognitive-linguistic perspective. In spite of some popularity, this approach has come under criticism in Bybee (2010), who criticizes the method for several perceived shortcomings and advocates the use of raw frequencies/percentages instead. This paper has two main objectives. The first is to refute Bybee’s criticism on theoretical and empirical grounds; the second and further-reaching one is to outline, on the basis of what frequency data really look like, a cline of analytical approaches and, ultimately, a new perspective on the notion of construction based on this cline.
Published online: 30 November 2012
Cited by 34 other publications
No author info given
No author info given
Ambridge, Ben, Libby Barak, Elizabeth Wonnacott, Colin Bannard, Giovanni Sala, Rolf Zwaan & Fernanda Ferreira
ELLIS, NICK C.
Ellis, Nick C., Matthew B. O’Donnell & Ute Römer
Gries, Stefan Th.
Heffernan, Kevin, Yusuke Imanishi & Masaru Honda
Hoven, Emiel van den & Evelyn C. Ferstl
Hung, Steffi H.
Kim, Hyunwoo & Yangon Rah
Liu, Xiaoyu, Shi, Heidi H. & Zhuo, Jing-Schmidt
Rothman, Jason & Roumyana Slabakova
Shi, Heidi H. & Zhuo Jing-Schmidt
Shibuya, Yoshikata & Kim Ebensgaard Jensen
Wahl, Alexander & Stefan Th. Gries
Wang, Huijing, Heidi Hui Shi & Zhuo Jing-Schmidt
Wolk, Christoph & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.